RE: April 26 Bloomberg ArticleToday 11:48
Vistry’s register is unusual, but not as contradictory as it first looks.
The big “hedge fund” shareholders are mostly long-term activist/value/event-driven investors, not fast-money traders. Several came into Vistry through the Countryside deal, so they may not have bought Vistry directly at today’s distressed levels.
You probably cannot find their exact buy-in price because UK holding notices normally disclose percentage ownership, not average purchase cost. The best clue is the Countryside merger terms, which used a Vistry reference price of around 741p, but each fund’s true cost depends on what they originally paid for Countryside and whether they later added to or reduced it.
The short sellers are a different crowd. Vistry’s disclosed short interest is very high, around 14%+, with names such as Schonfeld, GLG, Two Sigma, Citadel, BlackRock, Arrowstreet, Millennium and AQR on the short side.
So the picture is:
Long side: value/activist funds betting Vistry eventually repairs margins, cash flow and credibility.
Short side: hedge funds betting on the July update exposing more margin, debt, discounting, or cash-conversion problems.
The interesting point is that both sides are sophisticated. This is not a sleepy housebuilder anymore; it is a full battleground stock.
Captain’s version:
The long whales are tied to the mast, the short sharks are circling the hull, and July’s update decides whether the ship springs a leak or the sharks get squeezed.