Member Info for Ovets

Someone else has already pointed out that Navitas is unlikely to make such an announcement during, or immediately after COP30.

Sam has said it will be near the end of the year.

So tomorrow? NO

I think a new, reliable power generation system is very high on the list

If there's going to be a big announcement in the FI, I believe it will include the new FIG, which means it is going to be around 15th to 17th December. There are only 8 MLAs to swear-in, so that shouldn't take a month, or even a week. If they get a move on, all 8 MLAs could be sworn-in on Friday, all ready for the big announcement the next week.

Don’t be silly Happy

You really believe they haven’t already made ‘the right decision’?

God you can be a Pratt, but to publicise it is unbelievable

Agreed LTT and others.

Can you imagine the reputational damage Navitas would suffer if they were to change their FID announcement plans at this late stage?

Thanks Happy - I clearly hit the Bull’s Eye.

Now go away you nasty greedy individual

But NOT left alone……..

After FID and whatever else Navitas is going to announce then and soon after, this is going to be a completely different proposition, which the Horrible 'Happy' knows only too well.

He may have messed up his RKH share trading selling when he anticipated a drop, or just plain greedy wanting some of our shares and trying to spook us.

Happy is a devious little scammer and should be ignore, but left alone to repeat his scamming posts to unsettle those who still aren't convinced about RKH and beyond.

Go away Happy, you nasty, greedy individual.

Happy, or whatever it likes to call itself, having one last attempt to demoralise the doubters before it's too late, which it probably is already.

Stop trying to be interesting 'Happy' and go away.

For all those climate change deniers, who say it doesn't exist, here's something I bet none of you thought about.

If SL FID goes ahead, the RKH sp rises and we all get a nice profit, most, if not all of us will be able to turn the heating up this winter (which looks as though it's going to be cold).

Just think of all the extra gas we will burn and all that CO2 going up our chimbleys. If you think climate change is just a scam now, it won't be once FID is announced.

This is beginning to look very interesting indeed, making that Investor’s Chronicle article appear even more suspect.

I usually trust most of IC’s articles, even if I don’t agree with them, but this one is so superficial, poorly researched and presented, as well as the extraordinary timing to publish such nonsense, that I wonder about its authenticity.

Was someone using the IC platform to publish an article about a relatively unknown company, with some ulterior motive in mind? The sp certainly responded, and I can’t see what else caused it to retrace that much when we were all expecting a bit of a rise prior to whatever Navitas might have to say on Sunday.

Not at all convinced about the impartiality of this article.

By the time the new claim is won and paid, RKH might not even exist anymore. If it does and there’s anything left over for RKH, it will be eclipsed by oil revenue.

While the OM claim didn’t go as most would have hoped, we still managed to gain a very worthwhile total, which has cushioned the fund raising for SL and is quite a lot more than many posters here considered would have been a satisfactory outcome.

Sam deserves our praise for his perseverance in getting us to where we are now.

I think we should forget about OM and get on with SL.

Rolf, if anyone is still posting about you, it’s only because you contribute nothing positive to this BB.

Thanks to you , when the finger pointing starts, the discussion ends.

Please leave.

Santos, I agree and regarding Rolf’s performance, it’s generally understood that when the finger pointing starts, the discussion ends.

‘I'm still not convinced Navitas will get funding for the project’

That’s the sort of thing some clown (probably Happy) posted just before Navitas’ last fund raise, and they were completely oversubscribed.

Thank you Thenorseman

Agreed and thanks for the links.

I don’t believe anyone/many don’t agree that climate permanently changes, but the changes we are seeing now are unusually rapid - that’s the significant point. If they can’t be slowed, stopped or even reversed, what’s going to happen?

To be able to achieve that, we have to identify the cause, and rather like with Brexit, people adopt inflexible and aggravated positions, which makes it more difficult to discuss and agree.

In the case of Brexit, it’s looking more and more as though it was a mistake.

Completely agree dictum.

The point I was trying to make, apparently rather badly judging by the reactions of some, is the somewhat unlikely reaction of the FIG and the Islanders, in the face of their biggest revenue earner in decline, is to switch their attention to producing oil - some would say (but not me, for the benefit of those rude deniers) is the very cause of that fishing decline.

I’m not complaining, as I have bet the farm on SL going ahead and then expanding NFB development to follow.

And if the FI doesn’t produce it, somewhere else will.

And, SL oil is high quality, even if waxy, low-sulphur, so less polluting and will command a higher price.

And many more reasons besides.

So to the deniers, if you want to beat someone up, find the right victim.

I’m disappointed to find so many denialists not prepared to discuss such an important issue pleasantly or sensibly, but instead resort to dogma. Being ‘filtered’ by one of these I consider to be a compliment.

I was not insisting that climate change is solely caused by humans, although 8 billion of us, living as though there’s no tomorrow, must be contributing something.

Incidentally ‘Global Warming’ and ‘Climate Change’ aren’t really interchangeable. My use of climate change here was appropriate.

I’m surprised that so few see the beneficial effect that climate exchange is having on the FI economy, regarding getting SL into production.