Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
@funnyguy. I think the number 25 on a roulette wheel is red, not black. If you even get that right there’s not much chance of your wisdom being taken seriously pal. Gla x
Funnyguy,
Operational disadvantage?
Australian clinical trials far more efficient and cost effective than UK. Added bonus of tax advantages.
This in reality is advantageous as can be shown from around the 6 week application time to acceptance. 6 months later and the MHRA cannot even state what additional information they require.
With regards to the above, this has no effect whatsoever whether a drug will pass or fail its trial objective.
I did not see SO returning 737 but had a degree of concern with no development for a period of 18 months.
We have a new private company in the US for licence as released in the RNS. I bet you did not see that coming.
As for Riverfort finance, l must admit l did not see that coming along with its death spiral. Long term proper, positive investors took care of that with WRAP offer.
As for
'So, i tell you what let's reconvene when all the results are known and we know the next step, until then it's all conjecture. So regardless of your ability to copy and paste form medical journals what have you got?'
So you admit to it all being conjecture yet cannot see your blinding error with regards to posting waiting for confirmation of failed test for Sareum.
On top of the copy and paste medical journals, l do understand them to a great extent. I have spent 1000's of hours researching.
I expect good results on what l know. Preclinical trial was carried out with attention to detail. Reports given by qualified scientists!
On the other hand we have you.
You already see failure as clearly you do not know even when the outcome is not known.
Regards
Regards
I said people who invest on seeing SAR on the top riser board deserve to lose money.
Operationally disadvantage ie SAR had to set up an entity in Australia so extra expense, other side of the world
MRHA turned it down that's why we are in Australia you fool.
the rest is all about opinion. Sierra dropping and returning 737, did you see that coming. Did you see Riverfort finance coming, no you did not. It's all opinion. You talk as if we are playing roulette, but you know it will land on black 25 and its just timing. The only success of SAR in the last few years is the testing going on in Australia and we got there by default. So, i tell you what let's reconvene when all the results are known and we know the next step, until then it's all conjecture. So regardless of your ability to copy and paste form medical journals what have you got?
Funnyguy.
Your claimed 'tuppence worth' after reading is not worth anywhere near that.
What you have based your statement on has absolutely nothing to do with a kinase inhibitors safety or efficacy.
What l will say is that SDC1801 in preclinical was tested to over 30 times therapeutic dose with no adverse effects encountered.
Efficacy in vitro and in vivo were reported good
This information readily available by qualified scientists and you think you know better than them
Knowledge is power and clearly you have very little of either.
Regards
Funnyguy it is not opinion when you post
'We are not too far away from confirmation that Sareum have failed the tests and will not pursue.'
The above implies known reported failure,
You are nothing more than a little liar.
MHRA has nothing to do with testing you imbecile.
To go to Australia for testing at huge disadvantage operationally to Sar.
Where has a statement been made either expressed or implied that their is any operational disadvantage here?
As for the result?
Based on your ' confirmation that Sareum have failed the tests and will not pursue'
You don't know yet deliberately put up misleading information.
As for asking you on what factual material you base such a statement you fail to give a satisfactory answer.
I did not ask where those that opinionated flying through trials or close to a licensing deal gain their information. I asked YOU, where you get your evidence.
There is no evidence to suggest that. It has sweet FA to do with MHRA going to Australia or anything.
Now educate yourself sonny and don't post opinion as a statement unless you can clearly back it up.
You have failed abysmally to get anywhere near a fraction of a satisfactory reply.
Being here, as you claim for over 10 years it is readily apparent you know very little. You certainly have not been on this LSE chatboard as Funnyguy for 10 years
One more thing sonny I do not look at the leader board to chose who or what l invest in.
As for deserving to lose money? I don't think people making investments whether they go long or short deserve to lose money.
Clearly you have a big chip on your shoulder, you have already sold out here at a small loss as stated by yourself.
Clearly my investment strategy is different to yours.
Regards
Sad old git, i have been here in excess 10 years. I have invested, disinvested and recently i am trading and made some money. If results do prove to be good then i will invest not trade
Meant to say deserve to lose any money invested. People who invest based on top risers is not a good strategy
The same info others have about it flying though its trials and we are close to licensing deal. its opinion
but let's just say i base it on
1- MRHA UK rejecting
2- had to go to Australia- the other side of the world to carry out testing at huge disadvantage operationally to SAR
3- Have still to deliver result
4- hug problem with finance and funding so had to use Riverfort
thats my tuppence worth
Funnyguy,
Not sure what you mean by 'deserve any money invested'
I have been here since Aug 2012.
A long journey yes, even longer than l thought.
Companies have their ups and downs. These ups and downs do not change what the company has.
I believe in what they have created.
As you have no belief in what the company has created as indicated by your posting history, then what on heavens name prompted you to invest?
Regards
Funnyguy.
Opinion is one thing misleading or false information is something else.
This stated by you a few days back, can you confirm this is correct?
'We are not too far away from confirmation that Sareum have failed the tests and will not pursue.
On what factual data or statements have you based your above post, to give any credibility?
Correct me if l am wrong that if you have no such information to rely on, as l believe, then you have posted misleading information but also false information.
Regards
I meant to say, you deserve any money you have "invested " in SAR if you only know about it because you saw it on top risers board
For the record, i think another 10-15% drop tomorrow
And all the familiar names on here eg Celtic, i really hope SAR comes good for you as you deserve it. However, i am entitled to suggest it being a short-term play and expectation of a price drop. That in no way conflicts with what you think as everyone is entitled to opinion and then to make investment. For all the jonny come lately who post ridiculous things like "concerted derampers, people talking price down etc etc" you really should not be investing in shares as you have no clue about trading/investing.
When i post i am posting about SAR and my expectations so these postings are relevant. price going down is just opposite of going so trading takes into consideration both. Investors what the share price to go up and for the investors i genuinely wish you luck, but for those who are on this board and only know about SAR because they look at top risers , you actually deserve any money you have "invested" into SAR