Member Info for LochinvarLass

In the crypto world, many traders have two stances (I'm not arguing to bring the here, but I expect to see it happening to vulnerable stocks going forward):
1. Sell off at a 5% stop loss, which is always a risk if you haven't got the tools to buy back in on a rise, and
2. Buying to average costs down.

As this is FIFO, losses would be against the first in the queue shares.
a. If that is currently in profit, sell off to the Capital Gains Allowance.
b. If that is at a loss, take the loss and sell off other shares to include BOTH the loss amount PLUS the Capital Gains Allowance.

Then buy back Scancell ...( although that didn't need to said to those here). Many bots use the short sell to accumulate more of the target - but even those still need to be monitored.

(this is not investment advice)

I'm trust I'm not telling you how to crack an egg to make an omelette.
All the best for the weekend, LL

One can only hope they will buy back in with the refund cheques.

Just to clarify, those that bought in 2016 I think it was have 5 years to claim the 30% upfront tax relief.

Those that sell at a LOSS, can claim their marginal rate on the remaining amount (eg 70% of their EIS investment).

So, anyone who cashed in a pension and was hit with an emergency tax withholding, and those in high tax brackets can claim back the substantial loss - it's dropped nearly 2/3 of the price paid at the time.

All, at this time of year especially, those looking to maximise their tax credit will be taking their losses where they can.

The EIS investment a few years ago means versus the current share price means those investors can claim their highest % tax payable on any sales . EIS can be claimed up to 5 years after the date of investment.

I'm not too concerned that some appear to be divesting.

I think it is this one: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/cruk-city-of-london-centre-2020-symposium-on-cancer-biotherapeutics-tickets-81769309205

I'm sure someone else can highlight how Scancell are involved.

Enjoy that that feeling!

I've just seen this tweet:https://twitter.com/OxfordSciencePK/status/1222526256832557057?s=20

It includes Scancell's tweet.. Worth a share!

Thanks for this. I've scheduled it to go out on my social media links. Not sure if anyone will even see it much less like it, but every little bit helps!

Chelsea, I read your news much earlier on my phone. I was very glad to hear your positive progress.

Enjoy all the moments you can savour. LL

I can't open BBC articles, but I'm grateful for the heads up - I'm sure another reliable source will print the facts at some point.

It sounds interesting.

On a related note, it appears that there is a proactive approach being taken to find those who recently arrived from Wuhan

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-outbreak-uk-cases-britain-latest-public-health-england-han****-a9300666.html

According to a quick search, 4 reported.

https://www.hse.gov.uk/biosafety/diseases/sars.htm

Thanks all, as you can tell, I've just been doing a 24 hour time limited search.

I suppose we should be glad that 2 news outlets picked it up, even if one misreported part of it yesterday.

Note that the...

https://www.lse.co.uk/news/scancell-teams-to-evaluate-its-antibody-platform-for-cancer-treatment-vsuvksfeufwxvrk.html

Noe that the research agreement was prefaced earlier in the article as non-exclusive:
"Under the terms of the collaboration & research agreement, the unnamed Scancell's partner will conduct preclinical studies to evaluate Scancell's anti-tumour-associated glycans monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of cancer."
I just spotted this one which seems to be culled from elsewhere.

Thanks for the feedback. I've had a rough week so I didn't have a chance to check earlier in the week.

According to Google, it was posted in the past 24 hours, but is longer than that.

I posted the page on my social media accounts. However, I have a large concern about how investors get reliable news.

I think I will park this page and not publicise it until I know the information is accurate.

Thanks again.

FYI: I also found that this video came up as updated. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78mzvAW-7Lg&list=PLnk_WM-WosgWtvCXtxmtblZ6HXWz7ID5A

Again, from Proactive. Any other thoughts?

Has anyone seen this page: https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/220600/scancell-exploring-new-frontiers-in-cancer-research-220600.html

My filter was for anything posted in the past 24 hours so I'm trying to figure out what the new news is.

All help received gratefully, LL

Thank you for that insight.

Is there any chance of running a trial in a place where advanced melanomas are more prevalent? If so, there are many places where skin cancer is much more common. Some of these places are without access to the healthcare benefits we currently enjoy, so the uninsured or retired may not have seen their doctors about it.

Would treating them with homeopathic "remedies" preclude them from being enrolled?

Good morning all.

I'm not sure what to expect from the interim results. My recollection is that it's a mixed bag.

Where do potential investors in Scancell look for news and insights? As I mentioned, I came by them as part of an EIS offering.