London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
That is really interesting, thank you for sharing.
Watching
That message would be great but doesn’t seem to match with what Al has told estura to expect next week
Whoops I’m on a boat. The sea is bloooming rough. Can just about see lol
Well said Don.
Without side effects would be even better
DTW
One line across all forms a media
“We can cure cancer without side affects “
Should sort the SP. Gla x
Great post Jersey and agree with what you say.
I would however suggest that it is now coming the time when AS and the BOD have to acknowledge the patience and support of the LTH's by addressing the SP.
Researched LTH's understand that the AVA6k trial has taken years, not because the Co is inefficient, or missing deadlines, but because the trial has been so successful we are into C7 without an MTD found
We accept that many of us are underwater because of the shambles surrounding the LFT and the promise of supplying the sovereign test. Most of us can accept that the Co were caught up in the mismanagement (and perhaps corruption) surrounding government policy, but in the end the SP went to £2.75 and we never saw an approved test
The Co has spent £10's of millions on Launch and the DX division which has had zero impact on the SP. The Science Day was great and very reassuring but the guest speakers made only passing reference to AVCT and the AVA6k trial and again, it had no impact on the SP. Likewise the recent business update, very reassuring, a commitment to not boosting, all fully supported by the researched LTH's but no impact on the SP.
Next week however is billed as a shareholder update. We have been told that we are now entering the 'commercial phase' and assuming the results are as we expect and fully QC'd, I for one am expecting to hear plans on how they are going to address the SP which continues to languish at prices similar to where it was when the trial began.
We've waited long enough and now I feel is time for the Co to reward our patience and tell us what they are planning to do to commercialise their work and hence boost the SP, no woolly generalisations, some clear plans would be great.
Https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=weight+watchers+new+york+office&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-gb&client=safari#trex=m_t:lcl_akp,rc_f:rln,rc_ludocids:15912543193626774820,ru_gwp:0%252C7,ru_lqi:Ch93ZWlnaHQgd2F0Y2hlcnMgbmV3IHlvcmsgb2ZmaWNlIgOIAQFIoOzNz5i6gIAIWjkQABABEAQYABgBGAIYAxgEIh93ZWlnaHQgd2F0Y2hlcnMgbmV3IHlvcmsgb2ZmaWNlKgYIAhAAEAGSARBjb3Jwb3JhdGVfb2ZmaWNlqgFtEAEqIyIfd2VpZ2h0IHdhdGNoZXJzIG5ldyB5b3JrIG9mZmljZSgAMh8QASIb2iAlitqf0GdwHOFSHet21rZLoBInDKfBx71wMiMQAiIfd2VpZ2h0IHdhdGNoZXJzIG5ldyB5b3JrIG9mZmljZQ,trex_id:Vi6VFc&lpg=cid:CgIgAQ%3D%3D
Size buyers? Maybe we’ve got this all wrong. He might be referring to lots of the small buys that have gone through after he recommended the share in his local weight watchers group and their chubby buddies in New York. He might actually have been right all along.
Couldn’t agree more with that post JC and it is clear many others feel exactly the same.
Be professional in every way. Under promise and over deliver - not the other way round.
In the meantime we do the hardest thing of all. Sit on our hands.
They know you're looking so they are hiding. Until later....
Not yet, I don't know how he knows what he knows! Amazing!
Is anything happening yet Tim?
👀
Good.
Watch out for size buy orders.
I watched the open Hurstbot.
Touk - having just read your post I think it's important to reflect on the response over all rather than pick put one sentence. What we have here in AS is a responsible CEO who is articulating the need to be extremely careful in what is communicated - driven by his scientific background no doubt and the requirement for evidential based results which will face scrutiny by peers and the regulatory bodies. All of this whilst attempting to get the news out in the most effective and impactful manner. Cross the line and the company risks severe reputational damage which could not only be damaging to the company but also the light in which the results will be received. It's a tight rope walk and the fact that he is acknowledging it in a way that he knows will be made public actually gives me great comfort in the way that this is being managed by him and his team.
Sounds like you've got a bad case of FUD Derek. Best thing you can do for that is to sell as soon as the market opens. Your negative bleating won't be missed.
Yeah. Standard of care - changing over night - when approved
Estura
Thanks for info. I’m afraid that I don’t find “We’re also mindful of not raising false hopes of a quick fix for cancer patients” particularly comforting for a treatment that is going to become the defacto treatment overnight.
"I don't know why you bother seeing as you're all that confident."
Why do YOU bother though Eggy? That's what you should be asking yourself. Try a little introspection. 3 years of trolling a share that you're not even invested in. That's pretty sad behaviour I'm sure you'd agree (if you were a rational person of course).
Are you still driven to do this by your weird grudge against Myles? Or do you just like winding people up because you're embittered about your own failure in life and you see this as your revenge on people more successful/fortunate than you? Or maybe this is your only opportunity for social interaction, but you just can't resist that nasty little troll voice in your head. You know, the same one that makes you abuse nurses .
Perhaps you could let us know in the form of one of your creepy haikus.
And here we are at £1.35, thick as mince comes to mind.
So Point or Ely Lilly only have an exclusive licence for the first Canseek drug it develops.
Then any others are non-exclusive.
This opens the door for others like Novartis & Sofie to licence Radioligand Pre/Cision drugs.
Great deal by the Avacta board.
The agreement provides POINT with an exclusive license to the pre|CISION technology for use in the first radiopharmaceutical prodrug the company intends to develop, and a non-exclusive license to the pre|CISION™ platform for the development of a broader pipeline of FAP-activated radiopharmaceuticals.
Under the terms of the agreement, Avacta will receive an upfront fee and development milestones for the first radiopharmaceutical prodrug totalling $9.5 million. Avacta will also receive milestone payments for subsequent radiopharmaceutical prodrugs of up to $8 million each, a royalty on sales of FAP-activated radiopharmaceuticals by POINT and a percentage of any sublicensing income received by POINT.
…are lining up
I have recently suggested that people read the Sept 19th RNS and tell me that they don’t think they are on to something.
How can you read that and not think - “hang on…”
I cannot wait until 13 th - standard of care - changing over night