Member Info for wyndrum

What happened today to make you feel this way, inchpo? Was it the drop in the SP?

pretty brave catching a falling knife.... good luck

HKK, maybe, but there is always the possibility that behind the scenes the work ethics and practises of BH are very poor, or worse depending on the lawsuit. Its this possibility that the company is actually built and profits on these poor practises that make many investors shy away. This has been going on for a very long time. There is probably a more substantial reason than just "people are jealous of successful people ".

Why would investors risk it while this still hangs around BH? If you like retail there are others to choose from such as primark… (just kidding) but certainly Next, Asos and all the others that are not caught up in this seemingly never-ending farago of potential scandal and wrong doing. Just a thought.

AB, (imo) The 27p resistance is a "close of play" figure . So just because it breaks it intra- day is not necessarily decisive. (it shows the market is testing it to see if it brings out any sellers.o indeed more buyers!)

This is where patience and judgement come into play. if it moves away strongly during the day then more buyers might come in believing it will close above 27p and therefore won't want to wait until Monday as it might close at 30p today, say for example and be 30p plus to buyon monday

However the market will play games to feed on peoples FOMO and it can be a false breakout and then fall back (as it did yesterday as it closed at 26.8p) Hence the mixture of patience and judgement (which I guess also means experience)

if the deposition in the lawsuit is bad from a BH pov, then that is likely to hit sales on that publicity in their big growth market. I don't know quite why no one mentions this here when saying sales won't be affected just because there is a rout in the SP

The law suit requires a deposition on the 15 aug, so I guess there is now going to be 2 weeks of nervous trading here. Difficult to see a move upwards until that is out. Lots of stops likely to be triggered today.

Hi BP, you will get different conclusions depending on what time frame you are looking at.
fwiw I use end of day close prices and day time intervals as I don't plant to trade intra day, As a result I see it slightly differently to you. The DT was at 27p/27.1p, so we need a close and hold above there to indicate further gains. Currently its in a TR between 21.5p and 27.1p
Obviously we have had a lot of today above 27p but it closed just below it. So 27p looks to be a proper resistance point. Which is good as it will be more significant and indicative of likely further upward moves should it close above it .

(yes, TA will always say it can go either up or down. It just tries to give an indication of what move is more likely to happen.)

(To date it has proved remarkably helpful (for me) for timing entry at relative low points as I added along the way.)

Each to his own as always.

AB, you have no idea!
The short fuse that some people have to immediately personalise a differing pov than they have is very surprising to me. How they make money at this game with that mindset is beyond me.

But as you say, its very pleasant here and fingers crossed in the next few days or so we all can have a big BB "group hug" (if such a thing can exist!) ATB

Each to his own ST. my point was, have a plan at which to sell. The figure the individual chooses is down to them.

or don't, its a free country.

Trading around a "discovery" RNS will be fraught.

The SP could/should rocket, as it does there will be huge sells to bank the profit causing most likely I think, wild swings.

Trying to surf that as small PI will take some nerve and a lot of luck.

Personally I think a plan before purchase is always most helpful and part of the plan is a target price to sell at. When it hits that price you sell. It takes a lot of the emotion out of it and that will become more apparent if/when the wild swings take place (IMO DYOR)

Have a good trip and a great time D! ATB

Smalls, its about risk & reward. What price do you think it will dip to tomorrow? Say 24p to buy? (I don't think it will but that's neither here nor there.)

You think on good news (which is imminent probably any time in the next 5 trading sessions?) it will go to 70p.

So buy today at 26p and risk 2p above where you think it might dip to, against a 44p gain (22-1) if news breaks and you did not buy.

You needed to ask the question? really?

Apre, you can ask anyone on this board to do what you like and its up to them if they do or they don't, but this vendetta you and Epping have with me is very childish. and frankly stupid.

What you are saying is that you will not tolerate anything that is said not negatively, but negatively in your opinion, about AVCT on an investment BB for the company.

I'm not sure who you think you are to tell people what to do and what to think.

I don't see anything particularly negative in airing the possibility that AVCT could be taken over, indeed, many here expect it at some time as inevitable. If a bid did come in now for AVCT the SP would rocket. How is that negative?

The examples you use about my post being "negative" are simply ridiculous.

There is something called "free speech" and your desire to deny to me is typical of an authoritarian state. What on earth is the matter with you?

AS made quite a bold statement (amongst others) a while back wanting AVCT to be a "Roche". Apart from the last couple of months, lots of interviews and ramps on the future for AVCT from him over all the exciting possibilities they were developing, and then, after all the delays and the product arrives we get nothing. I think now that he was highlighting within his commercial world, what AVCT could be, and effectively saying "come and buy us"

ND may well be right about the small scale of AVCT's validation holding back orders, which in itself may just demonstrate how hard it is for a small co. in this field to break through. (There have been millions of cases in the UK alone in the last 18 months but the CE was based on what, 300 odd samples?).

Maybe AVCT just simply don't have the resources to mix it at this level and its either a long, long journey or you sell the company to another with the resources to commercialise the tech much sooner?

We have airily talked about "£10 before Christmas" to "£200 ex china", with only a little tongue in cheek, perhaps that is not obtainable for AVCT in its present form?

From the Bod's pov it could be they will be paid handsomely via share options and then high salary's from whoever bought them out and would suddenly be propelled to being big fish in the big pond? Whats not to like? Their world carries on but its even more financially comfortable and stable. (On paper they are all rich with the shares they own in AVCT, but look at the opprobrium AS got when he sold some!, so actually realising this paper wealth is not as straight forward as it seems, is it?

It makes some sense to me, because this silence doesn't. AS has always been quite vocal in between RNS's and this is not the norm, so something has changed, in my view.

I don't think the experience of the abuse his company and some its staff have taken has helped when people have directly contacted the company over the last 18 months.

I can see from AVCT's pov a TO would solve a lot of non- core business problems and allow them to concentrate on what they do best.

Just my musings.

If they took the short out 2 days ago they are already sitting on a 25% loss.....It becomes tricky if they have no inside info when to close out. The longer they leave it the SP could appreciate further, and then any buying (from them to close) forces it up further and if news should break with the short still in place then that's the annual bonus gone.....

Works for me...

I think, DBD, on small stocks like this the MM's don't hold much stock, so for big orders they can't guarantee they can fulfil the order spread quoted, so they have to build in a bigger margin to compensate them for the risk of selling stock at aprice they don't yet own.

The very positive side of that means that if some big orders do come in then the SP will have to move up quickly to tempt sellers.

TA says, (at this level), that most sellers are now out of the market and the price has been forced down by new buyers. As a result these new buyers that came in around 3.3p--3.6p are not here to sell around 3.7p. Hence any big order now will meet a wall of silence and sticky fingers.

Its a bit tangent I know Zoom, as it is just speculation, but I don't think they need to "decline" anything, I think just delaying it would be inconvenient. (for instance can you imagine if AS had to report that dosing was put back to August/Sept? (Based on his history of timelines think what that might have done to the SP?)

Once money is involved it can all get pretty dirty, pretty quickly in my experience

Zoom, PD, MHRA, they are all govt bodies, so if they are criticised for either incompetency or worse, then you are criticising the govt. If you bring MHRA to the govts's attention that the govt feels forced to act over, then how do think the head honcho's at MHRA would feel towards AVCT if they had instigated the flak?

AB, I'm not one for conspiracy theories but I can see that AVCT, needing the MHRA approval for dosing would make it politically difficult for them to come out swinging over their handling of the way LFT tests have been approved. Some posters here, when there was a rush to write to their local MP's, said it might do more harm than good.

So I don't know if your thoughts on a direct link between MHRA & AVCT are correct (could be), but certainly I can see a potential link between AVCT's "silence" with their continued and more valuable arm of AVA6000 dosing requiring careful diplomatic handling with any authority that can influence its uptake or not.