RE: Significant RNS - sweepstake20 Jun 2023 11:58
DTW, What is the matter with you?
you post: "WYN - you as k for a 'civil discussion' yet you post unadulterated rubbish such as:
'We know the money won't last forever, so we know the most likely outcome is a further cash raise' - you have zero evidence that is the case. You say 'we know' as if it is a fact, but it isn't a fact, its an opinion plucked from your sphincter, nothing more."
What i said was which completely contradicts your deliberately misleading view, is this:
"We know the money won't last forever, so we know the most likely outcome is a further cash raise. There is a chance that funds will come in from a license deal or a large milestone payment but we have no knowledge that either are on the cards or "imminent", (see what I did there?), so while acknowleding that possibility I would put it as less likely."
So what I have said that as a loss making company they will at some time need more funds. I highlight the avenues this funding come from and acknowledge there other other avenues but due to the lack of info, precedent and scale of funds needed, a cash raise of some sort is most likely.
I ask for a civil discussion, and you deliberately mislead and are insultingly rude in response. And you think I am the problem... jeeze.
I can never work out if it is simply a lack of maturity, or ability to think logically or a desire simply to be rude without being accountable, but in any event the level of self importance you and others put on your own bombastic , often contradictory, views is laughable.
Its no co-incidense to me, the level of analysis on this BB by the ones that are so quick to disparage, ridicule and insult any post other than "positive" ones is simply non-existent.