RE: To the anti-fudsters:28 Jul 2024 13:42
PL75, it is apparent to your, now only, historic references of other stocks of mine that you will not discuss my record on this one.
However for the record. I got into Harl based on the govt backing it. I believed that there was a greater chance of success than failure due to the highly sensitive political nature of the company. I was in no doubt of the fragile and underwhelming businnes itself, but as I say I thought the govt would not let this venture go down hence my involvement. I was wrong. Hey ho. (Still if you read all the RNS's prior to a few months ago, I imagine most would think they were would be fine.)
As for HE1, well, I am up on this stock over my entire involvement with it and still have a modest stake in it.
SNG? ah yes, the trial that had all the promising interim data released, eventually it turned out that the patients in the trial were also receiving other medication invalidating the results. Who knew a CEO could be like that? Oh Hold on, didn't AVCT put an antibody unknown to us all in its LFT?
What happened to antigumen?
We all make mistakes PL, and I am only messing about with these high risk ones, I am at least content to take a loss that I can easily afford to not be over exposed in the relatively high chance gambles as soon as the picture changes.
You just can't help your seemingly bitter negative nature always spilling out in these forums to anyones view you disagree with.
You constantly boast how you have filtered me bit always respond to what I post.
Some may see that as deceitful. Some may also see that as trying to display a look of superiority as you brag about all these "green Boxes" you never read, but still know all the detail of.
Long as you are happy though, thats the main thing.
Anyway, BBQ time now......