Member Info for Si_Derman

K, I believe you yourself posted a pic of it the other day.

See vessel in the background of the Petroc student photo shoot.

Re: BT's 02:46

https://www.navaltoday.com/2022/06/01/titanic-shipyard-buys-uks-former-minehunter-hms-atherstone/

Have posted several times about it's, apparent and changing future use. As I hear through the grapevine.

But Woody "expects" great things.

"“I am pleased that we have generated a lot of interest for the repurposing of the former HMS Atherstone, and I expect to make announcements in this regard as soon as we have executed a refurbishment contract with a counterparty,” Wood added. "

So, as soon as.... ;)

Re: 07.22

Maybe because they found a lot of something "dodgy" that needed removing?

See contract.

"Description

The vessels ex-HMS Quorn and ex-HMS Atherstone have [redacted] in various areas of the ships which shall be removed.

[redacted] is classified as Official Sensitive."

There were pics posted of the engines being removed for that purpose, Stokey.

Gotta run, have said too much. All those DefCons make me nervous. :)

Is the butter for when you are getting screwed by these "Big Boys"?

Sounds like waterboarding.

And, I'll never tell. :)

Simply hold long term, eh?

It took me 10 years of averaging down to try and keep up with the constant dilution (5000% and counting) to fianally get back passed breakeven and into some profit. So good luck with that strategy. :)

Jab, press the button next time. :)

So, has Seena Shah left?

Thanks Chris, but not buying it, sorry. They released an RNS less than a week ago and didn't think that a project progress update might have been a good idea. This seems a bit of a reaction post to calls on here and emails as to what is going on. imo. And once you break down what is written it doesn't really amount to much of an update tbh. imo......

Not sure about Stokey's reference to an export order at Appledore. Didn't see that in Kaerens post or for that matter anything about third party funded Port Development at Belfast, Appledore and Arnish has to be a positive too.

Stokey, regarding that ship that came into Appledore ,the Grima, I think. Wasn't in for long. Was being used as a stand in to service Lundy whilst the Oldenburg was out of action.

If the company has news then it should be given ALL shareholders and not a select few that happen subscribe to a particular social media platform. Appreciate you posting it to the board K, but it should not be how a company disseminates information.

Same with the AGM. Hidden away on the website, in a word document. No RNS.

K, not really sure if your 18:11 post is all of the post, verbatim and can't check without subscribing to Linked-In.

At least with an RNS it's there for all to read, now and in the future for reference.

This is a publicly listed company afterall.

FFS, don't tell JW about Snapchat. :)

Did similar. As you were then. Nothing to see here.

Have a good day all. :)

Stokey, re; the last sentence of your 06:25 post. Resolution 6 is equal to one third.It says it in the document.

"nominal amount of £576,824.04, representing approximately one third of the issued ordinary share capital"

Then a further 15% in resolution 7.

"nominal amount of £259,570.82, representing approximately 15 per cent. of the issued ordinary share capital"

That's 48% of issue. Is that standard?

IDK, but I can't imagine that they would go to the bother of including it if they didn't intend to use it for something further on down the line.

I was of the mind that maybe they are planning some kind of equity for debt swap. They do like to "negotiate".

Similar to how they paid the final, already deferred, consideration for Appledore. Cash and shares.

Maybe shares for a finance deal and the promise big returns in the future.

Plus they would still have to pay back the loan. With a "single digit" interest rate, of course.

48% though?

Hmm? Never a dull moment. :)

GLA

It's his night off. He's been very busy trying to extract information from Number Six.

No.

Firstly FG, JW has said many times that he is not interested in what the SP is doing. Basically, he is happy to let it take care of itself as they work through their "masterplan". Feel free to insert a Muhahah, if you want. ;)

Thirdly, there are no existing TR1's. Everything left on the, out of date, Sig Ho's page is a nominee account of one kind or another. AFAICS.

Cheers Jabido. GL yourself.

That's okay, Stokey. As long as you know where your towel is?

FYI, the answer is 42. ;)

‘There’s no point acting all surprised about it. All details about the AGM have been on display in your local planning department in Alpha Centauri for fifty of your Earth years, so you’ve had plenty of time to lodge any formal complaint and it’s far too late to start making a fuss about it now.’ ' ;)

Https://www.judiciaryni.uk/court-sittings-and-court-structure#toc-0

Yes, aware of the date of the pics and her visits, thanks. :)

Was just trying to ascertain if she had totally unloaded at Gdynia or if any of the containers were taken, and unloaded, at Klaipeda. That, at least, would have given another reason for the short visit there, other than a speculated crew change.

Cheers.

One of the new pics on Marine Traffic by January from last week showed her loaded up while at Gdynia 06-28 10:42.

https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/photos/of/ships/shipid:156168/shipname:MSC%20LEANDRA%20V?order=date_uploaded

Seems to be just hanging around out in the bay rather than going straight back into Gdynia.

No mention of Astra. Did their computer say, no? Or have they just been replaced by a "lending consortium" or indeed " syndicate of private lenders and commercial banks" for a better deal?

HI LSE. If I recall correctly the main owners of Storenergy, Engie, were involved in IM early on but pulled out around the same time as BP.

Not at home so can't check my notes.

That's exactly what I first thought of. Lol