Member Info for Scaffman

Sorry to burst your bubble , bubble .. but the issue and it is a really "major" issue is the dredging of the river wear.

The cost now and also the ongoing cost is detrimental, combined with a council that do not see it as a priority.

perhaps if Sunderland is under 6' of water then it may change...

Really... Is that what you are now reduced to?

If you followed HARL properly I do believe stokey raised this at an investor meet and they said it would be 6 monthly. NO story here...

As expected, interest rates held.

Off topic, but still plenty of ships in the English Channel showing up on vessel finder,

with possible 110mph winds at sea/ F11 due ... Presume most will be getting into shelter

Not a place to be tonight; if not.

Now, now, dog... things are after calming down here ! lol ..

The most important part I got out of this was :-

The company briefed Mr Sarwar on the need to enforce local content requirements, which would see offshore energy developers being "required to use Scottish and UK supply chains" to deliver their projects. The UK Government is currently consulting on how to"boost domestic" supply chains through "reforms" to the Contracts for Difference scheme.

Labour in government will "boost" Scotland’s proud history of shipbuilding by "directing UK investment to UK industry".

Actually don't think it's' soundbites any more. A company that prefers to bypass UK supply chains and go "far east" now could really start to get itself in trouble,even with unions.etc.

40% rise in under 3 weeks

guess i'm seeing things a bit differently than some of you seasoned harl investors.

the sea rose contract has now made the markets realize that oh ****! they might get to 200m revenue and oh.. they might actually turn profit within two years and all the rest....

Re - IM is a more attractive proposal. lots of major issues with Kinsale Project.

Mag-Mell-white-paper-on-reuse-of-Kinsale-infrastructure-for-LNG-23.05.22.pdf

See this report from developer Mag Mell above. A good read.. produced 2022

Kinsale 50km off coast in 300' of Atlantic water

Larne 25' deep? in an inlet

Petronas after decomissoning rigs and capping off so rigs are gone as of july 23

they are hoping that the existing kinsale head gas line can be used to keep cost down ? maybe maybe not..

if they are thinking it will be 500m cost, sure you may as well double it...

Good relevant post again LSE beats the weekend muck slinging

Only reference to cubic size is "mammoth" and half ireland's capacity,. so hopefully we will find out somewhere what the actual storage size ESB going full steam one to watch..

Thats why I and others post stuff like this? To try and get answers -if someone else knows more

Of course its frustrating not knowing everything; but that's what happens when you buy stocks

You, on the other hand apparently know the answers to IM? but were content for campaigners to spend a lot of money challenging the Marine licence in court If you had the answers you seem to insinuate, then all you had to do was let them know. and wait....

I notice Bibby Marine - A UK Co are in collaboration with Echandia for new vessel battery. Is HARL excluded from any of these direct deals or are they a part of it?

It looks like these batteries in general, need replacing on a five year basis so it could be a slow but ever increasing add on.

What is the revenue potential of HARLs battery deal with Echandia with regard to Maritime 2050 net zero targets.?

p.s. Broomtree Gallant defense of BP You really deserve a medal.. If someone can post up the rules of the board so I don't offend any long standing poster such as BP who has offered such positivity enlightenment and joy on a company in which I am a Shareholder.

Sorry, this is my last post on this subject

Blair Peach - You are very creepy, so this weekend is just for you.!

Ok broomtree My last message on this particular thread as its going off track on the company

Yes dog believes in the future of the company and as you have felt ramps it up but on this occasion he has been more insistent on the buys and posted it up; unlike previously. I personally felt the same but unfortunately for me I set a buy limit very marginally too low and missed out on a good rise p.s. I have read back approx 2 years of posts and read extensively on HARL and everything else before buying one share so I feel I have a decent grasp

regarding your comment - short term price movements in a share like Harl on Aim, is pointless.

I disagree totally. There have been several times now where a holder with extensive knowledge of the share and really following it, could have made decent gain if re-investing at these lows;or at the very least it has allowed them to average down to a more respectable level. that's all .

Broomtree The share has risen 27% in 13 days to which dog has been the first to speculate on and call

It has not been just a 4% one off rise on a good day

Sure, it may drift lower again but i.m.o. the shares could get stickier and not sell off as quick - all being well.

Your spat with Dog is clouding "your" balance, but certainly not mine

I am quite balanced and not clutching at straws Other posters can speak for themselves.

I'm heading to Dobbie's tomorrow to get myself one of those money trees that Kaeren's got....

Looks that way dog

ii behave like a herd once one of these starts turning direction, some others will follow the lead

Nothing new really in this, but steady steady wins the race!

If a major contract similar to searose came in would HARL be in a position to deal with it anyway without affecting FSS Searose barges production? If revenue does reach 200m per annum and remains at 1000 employees ie. 200k rev/ employee How does this ratio compare for ship building industry in general-any ideas? Would like to hear more sometime about smaller tenders/contracts that go under the radar; just to get a better idea of whats happening on the ground at all yards.

Yes Tricky I believe that when they start seriously re-evaluating these "cheap & credible" small caps that HARL is going to be right up there for investing in, for the simple reason that II may prefer now to invest in companies with "tangible assets"

LWHW 13% rise at 10 oclock I will be happy with that any time ! lol

Even if it drifts back-it doesn't really matter long term.

The fact is 1000 workers will be starting to pay their way.