Member Info for IsleworthSpy

of really unhappy posters on here today.

I, on the other hand, am extremely happy.
Happy with investment, happy with the BOD and happy with the compounds that I've invested in.

In fact i'm so happy, that I may invest some more of my meagre postie wages on more shares next week.

My previous investments in VAL have come under some scrutiny, so i would urge anyone who doesn't believe me to get their facts right.
If i do invest i'll post it up here for all to see.

Cheer up everyone, it's only money.

I Spy

@ cobalt.
When you say shareholder, you are surely excluding yourself from this.
3 grand a week is nothing for a COO. I know it.I suppose if you're on handouts, paid for by people like GM and myself, it may seem like a lot of money.
As for having no "skin in the game," it makes no difference IMO. The fact that their salary isn't all that, speaks volumes to me.
And as for sentiment, i'd say there are quite a few shareholders here that are happy with the compounds.

Are you cobalt?
Are you happy with the compounds?
Yes or no?

@ cobalt.
3 grand a week for a COO (figures that are regularly posted here). Is that excessive in your world?
So about £1,700 a week after tax and NI. Of the top of the head figures by the way, but not that far out.

@ groucho.
Totally agree.
The worst thing is many aren't even invested. That is by their own admission.
What kind of person does that?

What kind of person slates the BOD, the products and the price but clearly states that they will buy in at a lower price?

What kind of person buys in at 40p+, averages down, and then criticises others for averaging down as well?

And why oh why do these same people appear to take get some sort of twisted pleasure from bashing the people who are tryng to find cures to some horrible diseases?

@ Valju.

I know Professor Plum. Murderer. Killed Reverend Green in the study. Using a candlestick, can you believe? THUG!!
Light-hearted humour there.

I'll bet google has gone into overdrive though.

Post recommended Valju.

@ jonjo.

What was the good news when you bought in at 40p.
You did mention in a previous post that you bought in at this ridiculously high price, pre consolidation I might add, and I'm trying to research dates and times around this period when good news was mentioned.
All for future investment strategy. To try to identify why there were highs and lows.

So RNS's or media by VAL would be helpful. Not just to me, but many others.

Thanks in advance.

I Spy.

@ tozerk.

You've been saying that all day.
Why have you not constructed an e-mail and sent it already?
I would've thought that you would know exactly what you are going to say.
Or are you going to use the telephone after 9am tomorrow?
Or maybe even fax them?
Good luck anyway and please post your complaint on here if you don't mind.

@ JanuANGRY!!

Oooooooohh!!

Didn't you tug me for my use of upper case (BIG LETTERS) a little while ago?

Why is there this incessant garbage across all boards, not just here, that the BOD should have "skin" in the game?
Maybe they are just doing what they do best.

Yes, they get paid relatively well. But to put things in perspective, i get paid 500 sovs a week for sticking paper through letterboxes and knocking on doors. 39 hours maximum. 5 days out of 6 a week.
How many hours a week do you think they put in?

You are very angry for someone who's not invested. Other posters on here might take you more seriously IF YOU HAD SKIN IN THE GAME!!!!

@ tozerk.

Are you suggesting that the regulatory bodies who determine whether these compounds are wrong. They are there to analyse and report on data. If the results were "SHIT" then they would be obliged to report this.
The very fact that the next stage of develop[ment is on-going, seems very promising. To me, at least.
401 is going beyond P2, or have I missed something?

Please tell me what "seemed disappointing". I assume you are speaking from a position of knowledge?

@ tozerk.
You and all your miserable cohorts should get together and call for an EGM.
The process was listed on this board recently. I'm not sure how correct it was, but why not do it?
There are several alleged investors here who are desperately unhappy. If you need a percentage by shareholding, i'll throw my 400,000+ behind it.
All new knowledge, good or bad, is great. Even for this believer.

@ tozerk.
Please speak for yourself.
I am fully supportive of the BOD and company at the moment.
At least you are trying to do something to deal with your perceived problems. There are many on here, who though vociferous, would not support you.

And back to the compounds. If they weren't "working" at this stage in their development they would have been binned.
I'm no scientist, but the medical bodies that VAL seek approval from to further these compounds are not going to lie. So currently " THEY BLOODY WORK "

@ Hard.
I would feel exactly the same.
None of these compounds are fully developed. I take the fact that they are all still in various stages of development and have " not been discarded " speaks volumes.
GM's statement, " IT BLOODY WORKS " also tells me that results must have been seriously promising. Otherwise that statement could open up a whole can of worms. Who am i to argue with that?

@ Hard.
No idea. Probably because they were dying.
When you're seriously ill, sometimes it may feel better not to have needles stuck in you or swallow dozens of tablets. And let nature take its natural course.
Just my opinion of course.

What do you think Hard? Why did they "NOT BOTHER?"

@ Fredd1e.
Not my style to filter. Everyone is entitled to an opinion however much I may disagree with what is said.

I do, however, take umbrage with the constant negatives on this board.
You, I or anyone else on this board can do nothing about it.
Instead of these people posting from morning till night about everything that's wrong with the company, go through the correct channels and raise these issues with the right bodies.
This is what tozerk is apparently doing.

@ January.

You're right. I could be anyone.
But if you listen to JONJO, one of your little gang of detractors, you will actually know i'm a postie, and have been for 30 years.
I just can't stand reading or listening to absolute bollox. I feel the need to challenge. As do you, evidently.

@ tozerk.
I am actually fully supportive of your attempt at fact finding. I would do exactly the same if I was as upset as you quite clearly are.
Good luck with your efforts. Although I doubt very much that the BOD of VAL are doing anything wrong. Losing money, however insignificant the sums may be, makes some people behave rather irrationally.
All IMO, of course.

@ tozerk.

Excellent. Let me know how that goes. And i'm being genuine. If you genuinely feel aggrieved then at least you are trying to do something about it.
My opinion counts for nothing.

3 questions i'd like you to answer:

1 - What exactly are you going to say to the FCA?
2 - What evidence are you going to give the FCA to verify your complaint?
3 - Do you think anyone else on this board will back you up? Lets be honest, there have been plenty who've been gobbing off.

@ tozerk.

Are you saying that the RNS released on the 15th October wasn't necessary?

Yes or no would suffice.

@ tozerk.

Yet you remain invested.
Unbelievable!

@ tozerk.

Do you mean make it official via RNS?
You don't believe them anyway.
See my posts, and yours, below.

This gets more and more pathetic!!