Member Info for IsleworthSpy

@ gfb258.
The BOD are obliged to release any news that MAY be price sensitive. Do you understand my earlier post? Quite different to your post.
For Fux Sake.
Are you related to tozerk. FFS.
FFS!!

@ Older.

I can categorically state "I will not learn the hard way."
I invested last December initially at 2.75p. Top end was 4.75p ( haven't checked ). Averaged down since.
I Invested in an extremely high risk company that may make me loads, or lose me everything I've invested.
I fully accept I may lose.
Not exactly the hard way,is it?
And for everyones information, I'm in for just under 15K. Not much, but enough.

@ tozerk.
Read TonyF posts properly. You really do have issues here.
You, matey, are starting to sound a little worried. I wonder if GM would take kindly to your posts. You'll be finding out very soon I think. Not just you either.

@ tozerk.

Wrong again I'm afraid. I was not being insulting. If that's how it appeared, I apologise. But you do seem to have trouble digesting any other posts than your own as well as your cronies.
Once again, I choose to believe the RNS's. You don't.
Time will tell who's right. But take my word for it: If I'm wrong I will not be as bitter as you and all the others are.
I'm a grown up. I make my own decisions.

Throw a coin in the air.
If letter/packet volumes in my office reflect the results, they will be very good.
The current price and movement does not suggest this. All IMO.
I do however see the actual daily volumes in my office, counted in the local mail centre. And they are up.
And there's always the divi. Not you jonjo. LOL.

@ tozerk.

Why did you Invest then?
And why didn't you get out last December?
You could've been up 400% better off.
Have you invested since then?
I'm just trying to understand the bitterness you and many others quite clearly feel.

Your pants are on fire!!

Be very careful my friend, After all, you are made of wood.

VAL posting history?

How do you say it? LOL!!

H2H.
Definitely agree with the markets comment.
But they do occasionally.
I'll await the official RNS to tell me that my investment has gone tits up, or not, as the case may be.
And lets not forget, that many on here could have been up on VAL recently, myself included, if either greed or belief (take your pick) had not intervened.

@ tozerk.

Just trying to understand your previous post. Different words have different meanings even though they may sound or are spelt the same way. I was not picking holes in your ability to spell,merely helping.
The same can be applied for how you read posts. You quite clearly have difficulty with this, so enough said.

RE: Discussions.
You still don't get it, do you? VAL are obliged to release any news that may be price sensitive, good or bad, via RNS. The important word is MAY. Now do you understand.
Their compounds, 101,201,301,401 will always be in some form of discussions.
Let me explain how i see it. Dates are fictional.
Jan 2017
VAL approach large pharmaceutical and say, " I have a compound that could potentially treat prostate cancer".
Large pharma says " Let's have a butchers, hmmm, not bad but develop it further and let me know how things are developing"
April 2017
VAL approach large pharmaceutical and say, " I have updated that compound that could potentially treat prostate cancer".
Large pharma says " Let's have a butchers, hmmm, not bad and an improvement but develop it further and let me know how things are developing."
etc, etc, etc

Constant discussions throughout development. With 401, VAL have gone as far as they said they would.
Read the recent RNS's. I expect an update shortly to verify these discussions in line with the RNS's.

@ tozerk.

BATED???
Or baited??? Only you know. Use spell checker, OED, thesaurus. That doesn't make sense in my world.

You are forever accusing the BOD of lying, IMO. Every single post is aimed at discrediting the BOD and suggests that they are only here to line their pockets and that the results published in RNS's is somewhat misleading.

I choose to believe these statements and await further news. You however are talking through your pocket. Underwater and desperate, blaming anyone but yourself for what seems to be, your idiotic investment.

I'll ask you again, and a simple yes or no would suffice:

DO YOU THINK THE BOD HAVE BEEN LYING ALL THESE YEARS AS YOUR POSTS WOULD IMPLY?
This is not solely aimed at you tozerk, but all the other merchants of doom as well.

Absolute BULL!!

While i don't dispute that you fully believe this may go to 1 pence or lower, stop posting bollocks about your history.
Your nose is growing and you're made of wood!!

@ tozerk.

Calm down. All your posts are so negative.

FOR EXAMPLE YOUR POST TODAY AT 17:35PM

No new investors should even consider investing in Val without confirmed evidence that the company has anything of value, as they will merely be financing another period of BOD failure.
Look for a safer investment which offers a potential return.
Just spend a few minutes looking at the chart section here.
98% reduction in sp over three years, and how much have the BOD invested, sweet FA, doesn't that tell everyone they haven't even got confidence themselves?Don't fall for the you're investing in a cancer cure, because there's absolutely no evidence you are, but you will be investing in a wealth transfer scheme, money from you as a shareholder, straight in to the BOD's pockets. Makes sense for them, no wonder they're excited to carry on.

I've never suggested that the BOD are anything less than truthful. Read my posts.
You on the other hand would appear to me, and it is only my opinion, think that the BOD are being disingenuous. Please see a copy and paste of your earlier post above.
I will stress again however, that his is my opinion only, and if in fact YOU ARE NOT CALLING THE BOD LIARS, please state that here and I will fully apologise.

@ tozerk.
Is that what you were doing then? Or were you counting your future profits?
So when exactly did you come to the assumption that the BOD were lying? Because it wasn't last december was it?
Give me a date when it all fell into place for you. That this was all bollocks and that you'd been taken for a mug. That you'd pretty much lost all your money.

how all the merchants of doom were not around or slating the BOD early December 2017.

All these long term holders who bought in at extortionate prices.
All these long term holders who've been diluted to F**K. Not my words by the way.
Where oh where were they last December?

@ jonjo.
I posted a genuine question for Arsenal, he replied with what I perceived to be a slightly sarcastic response. That's fair enough.
Why do you feel the need to fan the flames you idiot?

Regarding VAL (Valirx).
Wrong board you moron. If you want to discuss my extremely risky investment there, type VAL into the search bar, top left hand side under share price search. Little white oblong with GO just to the right. Didn't realise you were that thick!
But seeing as though you mentioned VAL: My top price buy in is 4.75 pence, lowest 1.65 pence. So i'm down 60%ish. Your highest, i believe, is 40.00 pence. Current price - 1.5 pence. LAUGHING MY F*****G ARSENAL OFF.
What a seriously shrewd investor you are.

Back to RMG. I'm looking forward to the half year results this week. I'm not too sure whether they will be indicative of what we actually see in the delivery offices up and down the country.
I would've thought that if they were "acceptable" to the market, then the current price should have seen a decent upturn.
Still. Let's see what Monday brings.

@ Arsenal17.
You're still below your last buy in price aren't you?
Bad judgement on your behalf.
Did you sell at a loss?

@ nuri123a.

If you could see the volumes going through our office at the moment, you would be very happy with your investment.
I cannot speak for the rest of the country, but if this is indicative, nationwide, I would be very, very pleased.
And that's without the dividends.

@ jonjo.
Out of curiosity, when did you average down and at what price?
I fully expect you to tell me it's none of my business.
And what do you mean by " no more purchases until you can see SHORT TERM FUNDING?"
Are you waiting for another placing?

@ tozerk.
That's a very bold statement.
Are you suggesting the BOD are being disingenuous?
The way I see it is that they are in talks. They release an RNS to this effect.
What else are they meant to do?
They release an RNS, they get slated. They don't, they get slated. Lose lose IMO.
No deal has been reached. We know that.
I have to believe what I've read and seen on interviews and hope for the best.
That's why I'm here.
But I am under no illusion that I'm going to make millions. Quite the opposite.
It's called gambling.

@ tozerk.
It's AIM.
It's a tiny little pharmaceutical company.
If they run out of money to progress the compounds or even pay the BODs wages, so be it.
What else are they meant to do?
Surely you can't be that naive?

@ sicilian. My earlier post was more tongue in cheek. I totally agree with your data report post.

@ roses. I thought it was palliative care, but I stand corrected if I have that wrong. But I don't think I do.
Should it really be an issue for debate though?