Member Info for IsleworthSpy

@ Geecee.
Thanks for that.

So roughly 60% P1 = 60 out of 100
25% P2 = 15
40% P3 = 6

Probably why VAL could be a gold mine, or not, as the case may be.

@ January.

I think that you're way off mark there.
Far too high, and i'm all for the company.

Using your %'s.

Scenario 1 - 33% make through P1 and P2.
So 100 compounds = 33 make it.
Then 60% make it through P3.
So 60% of 33 is 20.
ie: 20% make it.

Scenario 2 - 33% make it through P1

So 100 compounds = 33.
Then 33% make it through P2
So 33% of 33 = 11
Then 60% make it through P3
So 60% of 11 = 7
ie: 7% make it

Again, based on the %'s you posted earlier. I think if either are correct, it will be the lower mark.
I will look into this further and post anything that i find that may be of relevance.
I cannot believe that 25% of all compounds that go into development are successful.

I stand to be corrected of course.

And i'm still a firm believer in VAL. And it also stands to reason that all of VALs compounds could be successful.

Spy

Courtesy of tozerk, posted last night.

consumer dot queries at fca dot org dot uk

The address that tozerk has written to with his concerns about VAL. Why don't all you "investors" follow his lead and do the same.
Posting on this BB makes you all look stupid, as nobody on here can do anything.
You're all so critical of all things VAL, especially the BOD.
So do yourselves, and everyone else on this board a favour, and contact the FCA.

Then post your e-mail and all responses.
If you did that you may have some credibility.
I doubt however, that any single one of you will do this.

Spy

@ jonbhoy.

In your opinion, is that how these presentations usually work?

If yes, then can you elaborate please?

@ tozerk.

Thank you for posting that. Although your e-mail would've been nice to see. I hope that others who feel as strongly as you do, will do the same.
However, I doubt that.
I think you're leading the line for a load of BS'ters. When you turn around there'll be nobody behind you, IMO.
Would anyone else like to claim that they have written to the FCA as and when they do it?

I look forward to any replies and hopefully copies of e-mails.

@ dvh.
I echo your sentiments. Nobody likes losing.
But to continuously air your views on a BB, day after day after day?
What does that achieve?
I'm fully in the tozerks corner, in the fact that he has taken his concerns to the appropriate bodies. While i may not agree with his sentiment, at least he has apparently followed the right channels.
I just wish that everyone else who has serious concerns about VAL, would do the same.
But the majority won't.
Keyboard warriors come to mind!

tozerk. Can you post the FCA e-mail address please for anyone that is interested in following your lead?

@ Bulldog.
Well I don't. So please enlighten me. I'm clearly doing something wrong.
And as a footnote:
1 -You haven't lost your savings.
2 - Lower class, less intelligence. What's that all about?

@ ratcliffe.

Or maybe he's just crap at presenting. I said it the other day. He looked dishevelled and uncomfortable.
I won't disagree just because I believe in the company. When he was asked questions, albeit only 3, he looked far more comfortable.

Enlighten me Bulldog.
Or are you going to say "if you can't see it" blah blah blah.
And using made up words from cartoons, how very 10 years old!!
Or did you mean dough?

@ tozerk.

errrr?
18.45 today. What on earth are you talking about?
Please enlighten me?

@ tozerk.

Well done. I don't suppose there's any chance of you sharing your e-mail with everyone else on this BOD?
After all, there are a lot of unhappy people here.

If you can't, or won't share your e-mail, can you post their e-mail address on here as you stated earlier. I would imagine if the FCA received numerous mails, then they would be obliged to look into VAL.
And of course, it would give the unhappy investors here, the ability to relay their concerns to the appropriate bodies.
Just like you have done tozerk.
Once again, well done for stance.
I look forward to seeing your e-mail to the FCA, and from all the others who post here.

@ tozerk.
Quote from your 16.32 post today.

"It won't be alright unless there's changes at the top.
Sack some of the BOD and get some new people in."

What are they going to do differently then?
The compound results are apparently dressed up. The BOD have fooled us all.

So please tell me and others, what a new BOD will do.

Your post makes no sense whatsoever.

Did you e-mail, write, fax or carrier pigeon the FCA?

@ tozerk.

I've used the same thread. Not that it makes any difference.
Your post 16.20

First of all, you didn't answer my question, did you?

I responded to January in an honest way. Please re-read his post, them mine.

Why are you questioning my honesty?

I've averaged down 5 times, and up once.
The reason I "DO THAT", is simply because I believe in the compounds, the BOD and everything else going forward.

Is that an issue?
Do I have to come to you and your little mates, asking permission to buy shares in VAL?
NO I DON'T.

Why do you feel the need to post negatively on this board for 18 hours a day?
Check your history tozerk.
Is VAL becoming an obsession with you?
If so, why??

I Spy.

P.S. please answer my previous question.

@ tozerk

And as if by magic:
Let's see who else I can pull out of my hat.

Why was my last post ridiculous?
At least back your last post up by facts.

By the way: It's postman. Just for clarity.

For clarity then:
Your posts appear to me, to be very negative.
If you are not negative about VAL, then surely you must be positive to some extent.
You have stated previously that you have an entry point, sub 1p.
You obviously expect some upside from there.
What would be your exit price be should you buy in?

As i said in an earlier post i'm thinking of investing more here. I may just follow your lead.

@ January.
So for clarity, you are prepared to invest in a company, that you do not believe in, if the price is right.
Is that correct?
My interpretation of that is that you fully expect to lose.
That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever!

How are your recent buys in RMG doing?
Still averaging down?
Are you still holding for the divi?

Thanks, but no thanks ratcliffe.

Santa's not real. Hope that doesn't upset you.
But thumbs up for the seasonal post.

PS. Reindeers do exist though. Do you know what they eat?

That's me.
460,671 shares bought.
1st purchase 08/12/2017. Last purchase 18/10/2018
£15,523.26 total cost including charges.

And looking to average down, again.

And i'm loving it!