Member Info for IsleworthSpy

@ January.

Exactly the post I expected from the more knowledgeable like yourself.

I'm surprised that you didn't mention the forever dwindling share price.
Or the BOD's "extremely exorbitant wages".
Throw in the constant dilutions that no other AIM listed company has. Especially a tiny little BIO that, apparently, should have money coming out of its proverbial ears.
Well, that makes a change!

My knowledge (very limited), comes from the RNS's. I read, make a judgement call, and invest or not.
I don't rely on posters like yourself who think they are some kind of investment guru.

If there is a verifiable oncology expert on these boards, then I might actually listen to that person. Not some desperado like yourself.

Are you going to the investor evening this month?
You clearly have a lot of issues that need addressing.

I Spy

It would appear that some of the attendees are out in force today.

It's a shame some of the regulars are missing. I look forward to reading some more extremely knowledgeable and informative posts later.
Cheers lads and ladies.

I Spy

@ hard.

My apologies for forgetting you. You are, of course, one of the least happy.
It was "in no particular order" so I'll add you at the bottom.

I assume that you'll be attending so you can alleviate any fears you currently have?

I Spy

@ FunkyG.

I'd imagine due to the number of posts criticising the BOD, price, compounds, newsflow etc, etc, the following WILL be attending.
They are obviously desperate for answers, as illustrated on this BB.

SO, in no particular order:

Chelsea7
Forkie
Rose's
January
Ratcliffewriter
Wayne Smith
Cobalt blue
Nomlungo.

Just guessing and In my opinion only.
Anyone. Please feel free to add if I've missed out any other serial disgruntled posters.

I Spy.

How easy is it to recruit patients that have had no success with the regular treatment?
How do you recruit these end of life patients?
You have all the answers, so please answer my question.
And when you have, maybe you can forward your recruitment strategy for terminally Ill patients, to the world of oncology.
I await your reply.

I Spy.

@ nomlungo.

I wasnt actually referring to you, but if the cap fits.
Have these traders now bought in?

I can see a lot of copy and paste posts appearing here.

I Spy

Two posters that have openly admitted to trading VAL, are now championing what you are trying to do.
Be careful who you get into bed with.

I Spy

@ Waynesmith.

Totally agree. That may be something to do with the constant repetitive and negative posts by many who frequent this BB.

DAY AFTER DAY AFTER DAY AFTER DAY AFTER DAY. They even spend their weekends on here!
WEEKEND AFTER WEEKEND AFTER WEEKEND AFTER WEEKEND.

It does get boring reading the same old shit!

Why they keep on posting, God only knows!
Oh I know. It's to save me from losing my money.

Thanks.

I Spy

@ Slater401.

I assume with your reliable contacts that:

1- You are involved in a placing and have forward sold your shares.
2- You are shorting.
3- You are posting absolute bollox.

My money's on 3.

So please explain forward selling and also your position here. Which one of the above 3 are you.
I look forward to your reply.

I Spy

It would appear that, according to our more knowledgeable posters, that any significant trade by size, 4M & 9M recently, IMO, are sells.
Well thanks for that. Details would be appreciated though on your opinion.

AND:

I think I'm reading this correctly:

60-70 million for a phase 3 trial 401, for a reformulation of a drug already in use??

I know it's for a different use, but Doctor CHELSEA7, can you explain these figures.
If I've misinterpreted your earlier post, I apologise in advance.. There appear to be missing posts.

I Spy

@ roses.

Not surprisingly, I disagree.
If it was filled yesterday, it wouldve been declared yesterday.
If it was filled at midday, today, it would've been declared at that time.

The fact it was declared after hours today, leads me to believe that it was filled late on today.
IMO, the late buy from yesterday was filled with lower prices sells from today. Hence the manipulated drop.

I do however bow to your superior knowledge.

After all, by your own admission, you've made six figures trading VAL. Although the six figures are open to ambiguity. As is the 9 million trade!

I Spy.

@ BB.

The million dollar question.
I would like to think that some news is due to be released. Prompting the rise and subsequent 9 million trade. Somebody always knows.
Trading today was above average too.

Tomorrow will tell.

I Spy.

Boys and shells???

Really? Predictive text gone mad!! Lol.

Spy

@ jonbhoy.

They have to get the shares from someone.
Instill a bit of fear and bingo, you have your 9 million shares.

I could of course be totally wrong. But if the price goes up tomorrow, and I don't mean in fractions, we may be due an RNS.

Fingers crossed.

I Spy

I'll fully support anyone wishing to pursue this avenue.

Although I don't necessarily agree, I understand that some on here want questions answered.
I have about 1.3 million shares.

I Spy

@ Uncanny.
The date stamp would suggest this trade was from yesterday.
I cant remember the boys and shells posted from yesterday, but I'm sure there would have been a large discrepancy from the total trades.

Total trades today are fairly balanced, buys v sells, if we take what we see as gospel.

So why the 20% drop today?

Manufactured maybe, to cover off the late buy yesterday?

Tomorrow could be interesting.

I'm thinking of investing some more of my hard earned positive wages again.

I Spy.

Or maybe it was a buy from late yesterday and worked all day today.
Hence the drop.

I Spy

@ Hawkey.
How many times, in this country, has mail not been delivered because of the weather?

@ DerekR.
A simple, but quite obvious post. Why can't people see things for what they actually are.
GET ONLINE PEOPLE AND BUY BUY BUY..
It's too cold to go out.

Post recommended.

@ Chelsea7.
Your posts Friday 22.12, 22.21, 22.35. WTF are you going on about.
I can't call them posts, they're more like chapters.
What posts from 14 and scooby?
I have a crew who invade the SCLP board now? I've never been on the BB.

Let's go back to where we started. You berated the fact that 2 RNS's posted under 7 years apart showed no signs of advancement for 101.
When I called you out, you said 10 years from start to finish is an acceptable time frame for new compounds. IS THAT CORRECT?
So the fact you were so dismissive in the first instance, shows how wrong you were. That is by your own admission. I won't even bother to copy and paste.
I actually agree with your time frame, and I have posted this before.

You've obviously been on the sauce and you are probably well aware that you should never post "under the influence of drink / drugs."
It somehow has a habit of coming back to bite you on the arse.

I Spy.

** posted an RNS from 2011 and then 2018 **

For clarity.

I Spy