RE: Home use is essential20 Sep 2021 16:04
I think GJ the market "valued" AVCT at around 40p prior to the pandemic. So all things being equal the LFT income is valued today, at about 70p, but there have been developments since with the AVA600 trial starting, the cash raise and the the LFT for sale as well as more tie ups, so what's the balance now?
I would suggest that LFT income has been discounted heavily since, because of the previous delays and non-events.
I think when you start to have this type of discussion it becomes impossible to value the company. As you rightly say do the other strands of the business remain at zero value until completely de-risked. Well, yes I guess it does, because it could fail and if it does what is the SP worth then?
You take a coherent, different view, so which one of us is right? It becomes subjective and based on opinion rather than being objective.
The best we can say is Objectively if all goes well and certain milestones are achieved then the SP will rocket but if they don't, it wont.
Risk reward is a different conversation entirely but it is risk reward that influences and drives the SP and again is open to a wide set of opinions but theoretically the market, through supply & demand, will come to a conclusion. But that conclusion will vary from day to day depending on what the majority feel about risk & reward at any given time, and not just about AVCT. Other macro influences will affect the R/ R relationship
AVCT are still the same company doing the same thing that they were 3 months ago yet the SP has collapsed. So whats changed?
This is why its not only impossible to "value" a company at any given time but futile.
If you want to take a long term view then by all means give me a timeline and a share price and try and justify that objectively.