RE: Thanks, Big Mike31 Jul 2023 17:18
Hi Wolfo, (thanks for the remarks),
My background was Day Trading (all positions closed at the end of the day) with indices and it was every indicator available and although each had their moments I could never find one or two that were consistent enough. In the end I found what didn't work for me. I don't like Fib, volume or MA's. Not to say they don't work sometimes just not enough of the time for me.
Anyway. Small stocks with their spread and lack of volatility and price movement generally don't lend themselves imo to day trading. Therefore when I take a position I expect to be in it for a few days or weeks (or sometimes longer if I think there is a genuine long term story unfolding.)
So, after all that, now its a hobby i tend to use my "experience" given the above self inflicted parameters, to use my "method" to help time entry and exit on the most basic of indicators given I do not have the ability to short any stock.
So I look at close of play prices using just H&L charts of 3 months a 1 year using very obvious support and resistance levels with just the RSI as the only indicator to show where there is still movement in the SP to rise or if it gets to 80, then either don't buy or most likely sell and if I still like the stock, buy in at the retraced price.
So I guess that's momentum trading.
(My typical "why use 1 word when 50 will do" approach.... sorry...)
The key, if there is one, (for me) is don't care about the stock itself. Don't ever get caught up with the story/fundamentals.
There is no such thing as research that helps. All research is, is a guess (educated or not), based on what info is already released into the market. When the individual thinks the SP will rise they are saying that their "research" is better than the collective market's view.
Taking that view, seems to me, that the individual has a greater risk appetite than the collective market in expecting sp appreciation.
So given that, and based on my experience on all forms of analysis), I think crowd psychology is more predictively reliable than FA.
But each to his own. Its mostly a crap shoot whatever method is used! :0))