404, senator,4 Nov 2024 04:59
Many thanks for your debate. I am a simple economist and thus look too far ahead for short term trading.
I do understand that tax liability has to be set aside on realizations before they can be booked as assets that form part of NAV/share. Beyond that I am just confused on what makes up NAV/share now.
They have not appeared to have booked the full uplift that 45bn REvolut implies -this is in line with many valuations in the peak where they also did not book all they could have based on last rounds. SO we went into the downturn with a less frothy valuation on some key portfolio than we might have. I have long suspected they try to smooth valuations to show a steady climb rather than a market spooking stop start pattern.
20m profit on the first half before currency movement is OK -especially if they are trying to save the best news for the second half so when we start booking profit it is sustainable.
For the life of me I don’t know what is happening to out 50% plus average sales growth per annum in portfolio. That should be powering NAV upwards unless they are still adjusting the multiple of NAV to sales downwards in line with benchmarks. I really just don’t know and that is not acceptable. There is not a hint of any portfolio company having trouble so where have the 90m losses come from unless a pretty sharp reduction in sales multiples vs value. Good to have a low sales to value ratio as a starting point in any recovery of SP but why now? Are they creating an opportunity for big funds with more compete information than us to accumulate?
Anyhow on the audited results in about 4 weeks we will see a lot more of what happened.