Member Info for sir_digby

They will have no option other than to update shareholders on the scope of the dispute on 29th June in the audited accounts assuming it hasn't been resolved one way or another. Either that or face suspension for not publishing the results.

We're heading into June 2021 and less than than 3% of the global population has received 2 jabs, less than 10% have received even 1. It's going to be a long time before covid fades into memory. We'll be dealing with vaccine escape due to mutation by Autumn 2020, global vaccination rates are not fast enough especially in the most populace nations in the developing world.

Try2buylow I suspect next week NCYT will be forced into clarifying the nature and extent of the dispute, this is starting to get press coverage. We should never have been in this position of ignorance, as you say ABDX had no issues spelling it out and you can be sure worldquant will have access to info we don't, you don't bet that much blind.

Right now I'd take Trump knocking up an rns instead of GM.

They can only hide the extent of the dispute until 29th June, at which point they're going to have to make provision in the results whether GM likes it or not. It's ridiculous that we're being left in the dark, sunshine is the best disinfectant.

It's the vague woolly nature of these rns that are the issue, the market hates them. They need to put a figure on the dispute and then we can move on for good or bad. They won't though and once again we are left scrabbling around trying to quantify it ourselves which is just completely unacceptable, it's beyond belief that he's done this again.

In the meantime we haven't been told of a meaningful contract since September, donated a huge number of tests gratis to unicef and he received an enormous bonus which now represents more than 1% of our mcap for delivering dumpster fire rns after rns.

Why is there no update on this antigen LFT which we're supposedly launching by end Q2, it is incredulous to me that they don't at least have something to say about it's progress while we're waiting I assume for a CE mark but no, nothing.

What about an update on overseas sales? Nada.

I wouldn't go as far as to say inept but out of his depth certainly. No wonder the IIs won't touch us with a bargepole, institutional interest is pitiful, good luck trying to get your next bonus voted through GM.

They have a fiduciary duty to their shareholders, I believe they are now in breach of this with the opaque nature of their rns'. If the DHSC are delinquent in payment they no longer enjoy the protection of any NDA included with the contract. If Mullis has overstated the cash position at YE based on anticipated income then he can can look forward to an investigation from the fca, surely he can't have been that stupid. Cash should be cash, end of.

This clown gave away 8m quids worth of our tests and then kicked us in the nuts yet again.

Agreed soder, the lack of clarity is unacceptable. The DHSC are clearly being billed and not paying their bills. Getting tired of being treated like a mushroom by Mullis. Other companies have been upfront about their disputes and the extent.

The comparitive SP is irrelevant.

NCYT mcap 278m
AVCT mcap 682m

We're either massively undervalued or they're massively overvalued, probably a little of both. However, while we don't know the extent or scope of the DHSC dispute the market will play it's games, ABDX had no issues telling it's shareholders about the extent of their dispute with the DHSC. NCYT's propensity to treat it's shareholders like mushrooms is wearing a little thin.

TUI trying to recover market share from jet2 who've been handing their @rses to them for years in the UK. They'll have slapped 30 quid on the overall cost of the holiday to cover the shortfall. Coincidentally there's an article predicting holiday prices are increasing this summer on the BBC today.

I imagine The Guardian wouldn't mind this. UK company being stiffed by DHSC and shorted by US vulture fund donates 1m PCR tests to UNICEF, while government slashes overseas aid.

There's no such thing as bad PR

Check them out on trust pilot, garbage. Tbf the same can be said of most of them, it mainly boils down to postal testing being unworkable within tight time frames when there's any significant demand.

Oriens1, postal testing for fit to fly will be a disaster. Anyone seeking to travel would be well advised to front up for an in person test, it may cost more but at least you are guaranteed to get results in time. Thousands will miss flights this summer, the tabloids will be lapping it up. The reviews for the test providers are already shocking.

I used assured screening, self tested at the lab at barnard castle and it still took 47hrs to get results. If I'd used the postal option I would have missed the flight with thousands down the swanny.

Concerning considering first identified as n UK only a week ago.

How long did it take AVCT to get an antigen LFT together? Ours will probably be released before theirs. :-)

The problem is the 'silly stories' and speculation exist because the company told us none of that which you've mentioned. Every single morsel of positive news has had to be dug up by shareholders, all other companies rns'd that they'd successfully tendered for the new framework, we didn't.

103k @ 403.55

I'd be stunned if that had been a sell, probably explains the rise.

They are in a closed period, the small matter of results being due and a contractual dispute precludes them from trading.