Member Info for PJT12

Unfortunate - but the explanation for the date being moved can be filed under 'routine procedure'.

Feeks, thank you for getting back to me. If you are referring to the link I posted then I could not find any live online feed, audio or otherwise. I am still searching and was even thinking of contacting the court to find out. If anybody else knows of an intended feed / link......

Feeks, when you say "listening" hard, how will you do that - and, if that is physically possible, wouldn't it make sense for lesser mortals such as I to do so too and to use this BB to convey our less educated understanding of what is being said, as per the jury's starting point? The likes of you, S&A and co. will obviously easily understand what is being explained whereas it will be largely be a position of some ignorance that will be required for the jury perspective?

Is there a public gallery / online facility for this trial? Haven't been able to find the latter.

http://txed.uscourts.gov/?q=location/marshall

......told you it was "dumb", having just noticed that Screenlearner has just asked it too!

At risk of asking a dumb question, is there a public gallery for this trial?

I don't think there will ever be a better opportunity for JOG to do a deal than now, politically especially.

https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/business/new-north-sea-oil-and-gas-fields-should-be-opened-in-wake-of-putins-efforts-to-drive-up-prices-claim-producers-3833654

DITRA, I'm just waiting for you to come out with that immortal phrase, "YOU WANT SOME? YOU WANT SOME OF THIS, SON?! Obviously accompanied by a 100m stare :-)

Thanks, aandi

Timster, that might as well be the conversation with how most of MY buys and sells eventually turn out :-)

Mattyboy, good point and well presented. I can only offer my most humble apologies and have duly kicked myself up my own arse, a trick that took me many years to perfect. The good news is that this company is therefore even better than I'd realised ;-)

Kourtney K at BooHoo might draw some flak as she's got more than her fair share of knockers............but I'm not one of them.

Too childish, I know :-)

Timster on the other hand......... :-)

Dunno if I'm just naive, stupid or gullible but I've genuinely never had a problem with Wyndrum's posts which he always seems to put a fair bit of effort into. Yes, he is a contrarian but if we believe in the strength of our own product and have researched it properly then his opinion should be of no concern to us - perceived as 'negative' or otherwise. Nobody forces us to agree with him. We should also be able to counter his points if we disagree with them that strongly, as opposed to expecting him to turn into a cheer leader. No offence intended but it's only through contrarian views that we can test the real strength of our own understanding.

Fans of irony and hypocrisy might have noted how Tombstone Teeth lists himself as a "Libertarian" which is defined as "an advocate or supporter of a political philosophy that advocates only "minimal (state) intervention" in the free market and the private lives of citizens". You couldn't make it up!

"Nanoco at the moment is a bet rather than an investment."

Don't knock it. It's only the AIM gamblers.........sorry, "investors" who'll drive the SP, most of US included :-)

Worth noting re. Long Covid but POLX has much wider implications than just that. Pulmonary ailments (incl. COPD) of all types and potentially beyond.

Basscadet, you are right, it's not a big deal, although I am left wondering if there's perhaps a distant memory of yours lurking in there, the one where you were left-out of that school prize-giving ceremony? Hmm?.......Just putting it out there :-)