Member Info for PJT12

My portfolio at the moment is geared towards AB & Co. coming up with the goods!........and very likely within the next 6 weeks :)

JW: "Said he couldn't stomach the binary outcome risk."

Was it ever anything else?

No - but I'll bet you're more experienced than most to tell us, Briggs. You are a bounder, sir!

Blimey, James. I hope you're not telling us where to go there?! Save those for that Briggs character :-)

Abatt1, "Odd enough share price not reacting well to the rns."

Not just yet ;-)

Sale:
08:30:04 103.503 1,910,395 2m O

For the military types evidently on here this evening - preferably not of a nervous disposition though:

http://www.walmington-on-line.co.uk/50-moments-that-made-dads-army-7-the-auld-empty-barn/

The likes of Myles and the MMs must be peeing their pants laughing at some of us flapping like good uns!

T

This from tickboo on the other board earlier:

Some large sells likely to pop up later. As mentioned on Twitter and elsewhere it could be the effect of the micro cap fund rebalancing as the cut-off is today.

Wyn: "So it seems to be an emotional reaction to a falling SP that generates the "rigged" MM's aspect surfacing here."

Wouldn't argue with that and felt as much. There have been the odd occasions though where I've been left thinking, That can't be right. Bottom line though, as you suggest, how can we know without total MM transparency?

..........well, nothing of serious consequence.

The thing I really don't get is how we constantly see posters on the likes of LSE pointing to "anomalies" where price movements are concerned but no regulatory body ever seems to do anything about it.

On a more sensible note, following MrRipley's post (which I largely agree with), would anybody here argue that AIM is not bent and that all price movements are genuine? I'm just interested to get any sensible arguments against that often suggested assumption.

demolition123, just read your post and the following question came to mind whilst scanning your words: Are you pis**d?

Doubtful - A second profits warning and China lockdowns.

"....we look forward to a successful conclusion if not by the end of the year then CERTAINLY in Q1 2023."

What's not to like?

"Punters have just been been told that they can gamble elsewhere until the end of March."

"....we look forward to a successful conclusion if not by the end of the year then certainly in Q1 2023.".....or they could get caught short.

I also think the RNS 1st para and header about the Licence might have deterred readers from looking at the second para where the key info was contained (AB's quote). Some would have just thought, Licence Extension, big deal and not realised the potential implications.

I'm genuinely not surprised by the time this is taking and would have been amazed at anything less, including this latest licence which is yet another piece in the jigsaw ahead of a Farm out. That, all the government u-turns, potential suitors' due diligence, working around the various parties' availability and then putting it all down in legalise....... Hardly surprising really.