RE: Absolute returns, and all that...29 Sep 2019 20:54
Hi Strictly
Great Post But
"It's diffirent this time." It Is!
Brexit has had a massive impact on Builders Sp's.
I don't think Builders are cyclical any more, (when was the start of last cycle?) nor that their performance depends on Economic performance of the country. For the last 10 years UK on verge of recession (due to austerity) yet builders thriving.
Dividends have grown from almost nil to around 10%.
The good thing is everything above justifies an adjustment to Book Value hence increase in Sp.
Dividends in particular should be reflected in PBV. ie if 5 years ago PBV 1.5 with no Divi then adjust to ?.?? with 10% Divi.
Don't know if that should be + or - 0.1 or 0.2, cos don't watch PBV, nor whether Divi built into PBV.
"It is what it is."
Certainly is, but whether it changes or not (for the above reasons) doesn't really matter. No change and Builders remain seriously undervalued. Increase in Sp's (as PBV decreases to 1.3), Builders remain not so seriously undervalued. Main point here is still getting about 10% Divis on top of growth. ie Return about 20% pa. Another point, hardly risky with the cash and margin (builders high risk?)
Posted this on tw board:
"Just looked up Greggs, a great NE company but compared to tw (from fundamentals here):
grg / tw
EpsG 10%, 6%, Margin 8%, 20%, Yield 1.7%, 3.8% not incl tw spec - increasing yield to about 10%,
Cash £88m, £734m, Per 17.8, 6.4.
To me tw numbers look far better than grg, so should have a higher Per than grg (say 20).
Then Sp should be 162.4 * 20 / 6.4 = 508 !"
One makes sandwiches the other houses, why grg Per almost 3* tw I have no idea, but it is what it is.
Last point.
As you know I invest in 5 Builders, cos any can have a disaster, so spreading risk.
Simply by chasing Yield, bdev 8%, psn 11%, and tw almost 11%, it should be possible to make about 20% without growth.
Not quite as simple as that, cos need to pick up Interims and tw Spec XDivDt too close to psn Fin XDivDt.
BoL