Member Info for mowzerrocks

I think as long as the S&S is as good as or superior the fact we are UK company will go a long way to securing orders. I think the connection with China for Innova will mean it will be a huge plus for Avacta. I think the difficulty is getting the product evaluated quickly and off the 'assembly lines' before Christmas. But a couple of weeks ago we all accepted it was going to be January. We just want an order in December. This will scale up quickly and people selling are doing it on sentiment and frustration and delays = sentiment. You have to zoom out and look at the bigger picture as a AVCT HOLDER. If you are a trader or looking for a quick covid buck then you will have sold. Best thing to do is to mop up below 110 and lower your average if needed. There will be positive news in the coming weeks.

PL - don't you think that you might be in danger of making the route to market a black and white one? As we can clearly see there are multiple paths to market. Look at all the research that has been done here and all the other boards. Why isn't there a clear path for approvals? Why do we keep guessing and reading between the lines? Because there clearly isn't a single black and white route. Is suspect that AS has very good science and has very poor advisors. Whatever discussions have taken place with the government, they certainly haven't assisted in helping avacta bring a sovereign product to market.

Look at it another way - do you really think that BAMS will fail for example? I understand that you are disappointed by the SP movement and anytime there is less than market expectations, this will be the case. The market wants an S&S and orders RNS, nothing less. How far are we off? Somewhere between 1 and 3 weeks is my guess - for both. Just a guess. But probably not one the market will disagree with... and we will see a bump up in a week or less.

The market doesn't decide if the product is good or will sell, it is the race it is interested in and the ability to make a killing on the shifting sentiment up and down. The TT is complete. I do wish AS had emphasized that element a little more. Additionally, some clear timescales of BAMS would have been super helpful. I do think everyone is underestimating BAMS - the new superlabs would best placed to spread the bet with testing techniques given the number of false positives PCR seems to be generating. AS specifically points this out in his video this morning.

https://avacta.wistia.com/medias/30w6vgnvmg

He is an incredibly positive CEO but in a convincible scientific way not in a rampy way. He probably suffers from extremely poor advice - he should never have sold shares. He and others probably convinced themselves that the nasal option was a fail safe and therefore derisked it. I'm confidence of the science here still, but I do think there needs to be a change in the Board/PR to better manage this company's future which imho is still extremely bright. The market is very sensitive to anything other than a slam-dunk and the vaccine elements are all out now... so the only way is up bar a few trader shifts to endure.

What PL said! Seriously MFM... I see the sun is the source :( but why the sudden foray into the world of google? I guess we aren’t without sport though...EH has stolen the show today ...

Has something been changed ? The Twitter link above just shows the photo of the test tubes from 2nd Nov... what did I miss....

Well the fact that Biden didn’t get a landslide just shows how crazy is really popular at the moment!

We are putting up tree- got fake one this year. Biggest complaint is needles on the floor still. Bah humbug.

My trump supporting 88 year old father sent me something similar to this. I think is potentially misleading - any of these tests in isolation are potentially going to throw up ‘errors’. Take a test and expect a binary answer but what is the question you are trying to answer? Do you have the covid virus in your sample ... well PCR is answering that with a high degree of accuracy. If the question is whether you are infectious then that is a completely different question - the ideal situation is just for the infectious diseases to isolate... how do you determine that? Repeated tests... and even AS pointed this out... this is why the sensitivity % just needs to pick up the most infectious. Obviously user error needs minimising as well. Test test test.

That is just stupid. There is an awful lot of stupid going on. My daughter is home isolating. 7 positive cases including teacher. 5 more with symptoms but neg tests. Think we dodged a bullet so far.... but only 1 week in. The teacher is sick and doing zoom calls... this isn’t needed as it is only Y1 - I say give teachers a break! They have assistants and supply teachers for a reason. My daughters teacher did video with the class at school whilst she was at home because her son had covid (teens) and had to isolate. Absolutely agree they should be testing teachers twice a week... or more. Why the union hasn’t pushed for that I don’t know.... I haven’t seen a petition either...

This is for Mapp:

Rotterdam by Beautiful Al

And our Global tugs his shares
Like he's trying to prove they exist
And all the mm's are gargoyles
wide spread, supply ‘n demand is dead
The whole place is ducked
The people are ducked for sure
And no one knows if the RNS will arrive
But there must be a leak or two or five
This could be Rotterdam or anywhere
Liverpool or Rome
'Cause Covid is everywhere
Give us testing at home!

Interesting - I might have a go. It was pretty stressful not being able to react at all and the duplication was a dreadful experience. I will dig out the FT article. Thanks!

Correction if I may.... - 'How Big, how Blue, how Beautiful - Florence and the BAMS Machine'

Yeah - just a pointer to our T&Cs etc etc... it didn't even answer the detailed questions I asked about what they were going to put in place to ensure that something similar doesn't happen again in the turbulent times ahead...

We are 'Feeling Hot Hot Hot' by the Wetherbymen.

Just a quick question - just curious, did anyone have any luck getting anywhere with HL in terms of compensation for not being able to log on that afternoon or getting stop losses only at 102/3 ? I think someone said they previously got free trading for x months?

We have the best BB on LSE. What Friday night humour have we got in store ? Top of the Pops best Covid songs?

Completely agree PL - the longer term play here and the confirmation by Daewoong injecting a butt load of cash and others in the science community recognising the potential of affimers. I think perhaps that was part of the rerate. If Al didn't think affimers would work, then he wouldn't have risked the reputation imho. I think the volatility is the AIM in general and the type of PI being lured in etc - vicious circle. You really have to tune out to the fluctuations and be prepared to risk your capital. I have perhaps more than I would like from a portfolio view... and the bit I'm most annoyed about is that the travel stocks shot up soooo much as I had bailed on IAG and EZJ and RR - though I made some back with some RR trading. I kept CCL though... I do feel that come YE results the markets will dip a fair amount again... especially when things are going back to normal as quickly as hoped and more businesses sadly fail and banks write off more debt...

PL - someone likened covid plays to crypto. The anticipation and prospects are undoubtedly similar- though with covid there are tangible products and a somewhat quantifiable market (short-medium term for certain). The one thing that truly sets it apart and that I’m so very grateful for is that it isn’t a 24/7 market like crypto. Having said that - I’ve more than covered my Avacta present losses with Bitcoin surge and at least a stop loss actually works on crypto exchanges! Swings and roundabouts!

There is that talk of walking again... what is with the fresh air and exercise shenanigans... lol I just love getting neck ache and migraines watching the price