Member Info for milnrowmug

Mickb, if you can slice at profit, why not a small %? Bit of an each-way bet?

TAF, I note the 2 examples you give are of buy-back to cancel; that is "real" buy-back imo.

I do not follow the contention that they disprove Pboo's opinions that owners of acquired companies prefer cash to shares and that if shares given they want the best deal. I have no real objection to these opinions: just, are they relevant here?

TAF, have you more to add which would clarify?

Enjoy! Happy day when you post once only. Quiet on posts and trades: oil flows, no complaints.

Seems it went live again c.1300. No idea what it was about.

anyone got a theory? 2 different platforms affected.

Excce, give your tardis a service, and buy just over a year ago; better, just over 2y.

There are good reasons to buy now, I expect many will post these. The zulu lithium resource appears excellent. Personally I have sliced in the last month. Ggr has an appalling record of dithering and poor decisions and delivery, we all hope the Chinese have straightened him out. Gla.

So, as ever, your cash your choice.

And an astroid strike in Surbiton?

Oh, and this particular choice not likely to be stoopid, imo.

Chitty, AIM is a risk sure. But it's the companies' individual actions make them so. Your prospects don't dive BECAUSE you're quored & traded aim. It will be what it is.

Pboo, possibly, but not the sole possible explanation.

ScottW, I agree with persi's post but not that it's relevant to your question.

Imo, the problem with these buy-backs is that they're being retained by the Company, not cancelled. Hence, they might find their way back into the market in the future. Cancelled shares are "real" buy-backs to me; because they are gone, they genuinely concentrate the value of the company in fewer units, the exact opposite of a placing. Ryanair have been big on buy-back. They cancel, the real deal.

Anyway, small rise today. Gla, even her.

Mrcau, given the low value of some trades, I thought we had attracted the 212-platform day-traders.

Offic, if I post where not invested, I include that fact. Honesty, the best policy.

Funst, sure, I don't think something of our significance would be a target. Yet, targets they will have. I prefer open mind.

Current board not inept, they just are senior and come over yokelley. I have confidence, spot-on O&G, & geology, seen it done it worn out the T-shirts years ago.

JOkin, whom do they make from? The only losers are careless traders, plus investors beyond their liquidity. Hope that's not us.

JOkin, you mean about 14m back when it was 11p?

Heid this isn't a real buy-back, they aren't being cancelled.

But I agree (uniquely) with your 19:46 post.

Rained a lot, as we have heard; plus see the wind in the 'hot tub''s blue liner.

Thanks Bongo, I was on the point of saying.

Raisi & offic, not just yet apparently.

Not currently invested here.

Fair enough; we appear divided solely on the specific WN prospects. I would note, while its good to have 40% of a producing well, 16% is more prudent at this early stage.