Member Info for milnrowmug

MRPlu, clearly they remained not convinced of Wressle beyond consolidation, hence the last placing. Pretty convincing now though.

I generally oppose consolidation, but can't agree with you in this case. The sp expressed in hundredths of a penny led to difficulties in showing it accurately on some platforms: however maybe a smaller ratio would have sufficed.

TAC, my take is that was an instantaneous rate, like when you're doing 100mph but don't actually drive 100 miles in the hour. Still, whatever, 20% flow up good at any oil price. As previously mentioned, gas to pipe is the real deal, then un-choke as far as it goes well. I wonder when?

Come on, anyone might perceive imminent sp fall. No evidence of insider info, it was trading not shorting.

Johnp, was it not £6k for 23/4 also?

I really need to shut down my taxable accounts and go for sipp or isa shelter. Or make less profit, something I find increasingly easy.

When especially indecisive, you can always go 50/50. This works well if you're not sure your next share will do better than ctl.

Wjt, ezj was similar at lockdown, done better than us year to date. This is shares: anything possible, gla.

Nice try.

I know that Micky, read last post.

Agree with Markh & Saab, this is a good buy in price for long term.

However I still don't think you should follow bb advice!

Micky I've said, today and several previous, that it cannot be proved either way. However, imo, given the behaviour of sp particularly following good news or large buys, it would be wisest for me to assume there is shorting. Others may genuinely believe there is none: that's fine; but if you try to assure them there can be no shorting, you will be contradicted.

Any evidence known there is no shorting please bring forward? But, as I started...

PAUL1, it can be sustainable and renewable. First you need to keep it out of landfill and watercourses: some way to go.

JOkin, agree. Micky, boring? Moi?

Nice idea Mr_B, but imo it ignores the fact many are here principally for those 3 aims, they aren't investors they aren't traders. JOkin thinks they're shorters, my opinion too. Bring on the denials, can't be proved either way.

Wjt & shaun, I agree with you but clearly the markets didn't today. Give it time: I shall.

NOVEC, I am convinced that olive was dodgy. You not?

SB says Glasgow? Years ago, I asked if Heid was "awa 'n' boil y'heid". You denied; but, can you believe anyone on here?

JOkin, what's the point of your coal-fired smart meter post? Industrial energy users have had cutoff deals for decades: technology allows this to be extended to domestic customers. All to the good imo, matches output to usage.

Heid, concur olive was troll & prob rnst. Posts weaved & wavered, mind mine too are somewhat variable.

While I had hoped for the £3 party, to see which of these folks really existed, that seems as far away as ever. Near Wressle? Hull, Doncaster, Lincoln, Newark? SP progress is slow, we may be afar&asunder when true value lands.

So, a new kind of foreign aid? Save, India isn't 3rd world anymore, huge spending middle class economy, & its own space programme.

PI100, err, where did 25% turn to 15%? If you think the sp should be lower, or you want it to be lower just say so; no need to invent.

To get back to real resource, company, & share facts; after all this. Sorry folks, all posters should not be unchallenged, but, errr...