Member Info for milnrowmug

OK Heid these are not working hours and some may have taken a small aperitif, but WHAT is the last post about?

Maxwell you are not alone. This engineered approach to deramping tells me two things, ignore, disengage. They only thrive if people treat them as human.

Fair enough JB, several placings have followed that pattern I realise. I regard this as somewhat fantastic, however. Uncertainty vanquished, funded, income, profitable even? Where else on aim such a fantastic deal at the price? If you're right about 20p, the back if the sofa will receive attention.

JB how you work that out?

LonSouE seem to be in a mess with RNSs again.

Meanwhile, a line drawn under ujo's uncertainty. Onward and upward!

That's it give us your cheery angle.

Not here, no. But wait&see.

Good question, Micky, but you're such a misery. I am in both, so also disappointed. WN news surely good for ujo, egd has no leak problem. I am optimistic, or why else still in. Dim panicio, imo.

Placing! What placing? (easy guys - kidding.)

That further 12.5% interest is the best deal I've heard lately.

Baits I maintain it is unknown: not 100% there will be placing, when it happens, number, price of new shares? Markets never like uncertainty.

Baits, the uncertainty, fear of the unknown, is the biggest problem. Any decision on a rns will help this.

I regard buy-back as the opposite to placing. One is concentrating share value when you have funds not required for business activity. The other dilutes share value for activity otherwise unfunded. Imo neither is inherently better than increasing, or reducing, divi.. Horses for courses & one size does not fit all.

Placing or cutting dividend are usually better than borrowing; as for lending out surplus funds forget it.

Well it did a bit higher, the UT making it 1.6.

A kindly chap once explained UTs to me, but life's too short, and my head too full of other junk.

A bit volatile, this afternoon?

Pboo, perhaps the Swift solution to food problem?

Purist (or merely pedantic) mathematicians might point out there is no such thing as 30.5/64ths, it probably means 61/128(ths). Yeah, just under half an inch, 1/2".

Remember Stonehenge from Spinal Tap?

GLA, this is a strange day, but I hope & expect we will remember it with happiness and gratitude.

The dent in confidence is not just a paper capital loss to holders. It makes the company an extreme bargain for a predatory takeover. Still, at least a biggie would be able to keep future sensitive news under wraps.

That revenue, if sustained month on month, makes mcap look plain silly: IF much comes of W.Newton or Biscathorpe, then colossally silly, imo.

So with this cash income we still need to raise? Ideas, folks?