Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
But can buy a few 21.4p.
Just so, Halifax (Lloyds) go negotiated-only for 24k.
Tony, what does the first sentence mean?
Samth makes fair points, I might be slightly more optimistic.
Yes sure, I know the condition exists, I have suffered, friends worse, no-one quite died but there was concern. The pharmaceutical (trade) named Diamox, commonly for glaucoma, is effective in reducing altitude effects. The wise sick mountaineer takes it to descend safely, not to bag an extra peak.
On holiday I chatted with a guy who lived above 10,000' in Colorado. He said after months on a yacht, he would have to be careful when he went home. Recall the demise of John Peel the DJ?
SOLG fans, please accept my apology for this diversion.
Haha, Mirey Zac again! Sure he can be right, perhaps accidentally, but I prefer to ignore. Dyor, hope you can see positives.
Eloro, sorry if this is a bit Pedants Corner, but the onset of altitude sickness can not be defined by the odd 8m, individuals vary. Maybe it's a conversion of 8,000'? That is approximately the height airlines pressurise cabins down to.
In my youth I have been high in the Alps and Nepal: now maybe I should get out more.
Why do you think withdrawal likely? If it's really likely, then why is the duration of claim relevant? Is this true insight or merely deramp?
Mmhat, I find your assertion, "Shareholder confidence makes no difference to a share price", ludicrous. For once agree with Heid. Imo it's the main influence. Of course there are sideline fiddlers, but if holders hold and new holders buy they won't get very far. Maybe you mean just ujo not generally. For you are right this has been played, sometimes allowing mug retail punters to buy unbelievably cheap, sometimes robbing the injudicious.
In the light of recent rns, who knows? Facts are there, personally happy to hold.
We are still reading the usual insistent derampers, EVERYTHING is bad news, but really, our two recent issues are fine, and wn still in the balance, all good.
You're getting closer! I have done a 10% slice at gain: I look forward to a much higher sp , but, you know, markets. Imo the company is worth a lot more than this but we shall see.
Acker, and while it does, traders will buy, traders will sell.
I bought back my most recent slice this morning.
AHS, of course the sp has already been a lot lower than this, and quite a bit higher. Those were when a producing mine was MUCH further away than now; also with fewer shares in issue. Hmmm.
'Far as I can see, Merrill lynch have increased their holding (well you would at those prices). Others, correct by all means.
Geseppe, I'm a member of a credit union which took advice that you should change auditors from time to avoid over-cozy relations. The new one charged five times the fee for no perceptible difference.
Heid, the BoD runs the company, creates profit, and passes it to the owners: they have been quite good at the first two. They don't set sp, that's the market, flawed and fiddled as it may be.
HerbTurb, before Big Brother, bakeoff, and Strictly came out; the only way intensely boring people could appear interesting was to seek minor local elected office (or a shooting spree). There are keen well-intentioned councillors too. The agenda is from the lowest level: it is the District, in some areas County, who actually decide.
JB imo the £1 option does still stand: the folly was making it a firm prediction with timescale.
No, thx.
Itsaw, I don't see it as automatically a problem, but thanks for looking and posting.
Slack I differ, but not tied to short term. Admit surprisingly low.
They may be, I hold neither. On the briefest research, it appears both have lost most of their mcaps in the last 18m: does that not then supports the divi case? If there had been payments due, might fewer holder have rushed for the exit?
Perhaps ryaay (ex-Rya) is a better example of doing OK without divi, but I haven't held since they departed lse. I also dumped a local (but quoted) company when they switched their divi from cash to a new class of non-voting share. In conclusion, I'm happy to invest where profits are still in the future, but when they arrive I want my share.
This happens with many shares, both directions, especially small-gap &/or fast-moving. It's not usually sinister or manipulative, do you have any suspicion?