Member Info for MegaTron1981

That's true. I suppose taking on additional projects diversifies risk, but it will cost... It didn't sound as though anything was on the radar, but who knows.

That does make me happy. Hate to see anyone suffer like that. On to other matters, does anyone have any thoughts on the plans to pick up other projects at various stages of development? My first thought, probably unfairly, was 'Woodburn' and 'they're taking eye off the ball'... Would value some other points of view.

It's true, I remember a guy on here who was really suffering posting all the time about how he knew Adrian from a different BB and in the end he sold up about a week before it turned the corner. I think it was £00000s pension money he lost and the guy was nearing retirement. Felt gutted for him, but putting more than you can afford to lose into a risky turnaround play on AIM on the word of someone from a bb...? Whose fault is that really? You have to look at yourself. I've done it. It's a hell of a lesson. You can't trust anyone online. I don't think AP is dishonest, more over confident and believes his own hype. That's all I have to say on the matter. Let's move onwards and uowards!

I've been in since before the requisition and let's be honest without AP/PW, INFA was dead. LT holders would have nout had they stuck with the previous lifestyle BOD. AP had no experience leading a listed company and it showed, but he did appoint Matthew Beard (who appears to have enabled the FEED funds to be gradually released with the bit by bit approach) and Graham Lyon who has done the business and brought in John Wood one presumes. I think people need to drop the armchair commentary and show a little respect to the fella. Took a lot of balls, effort and time away from his self-built summerhouse to what he did. If you look back over Danawinners' lse history, as I did pre requisition, you'll see the guy has also suffered at the hands of the market, particularly with PMG. How many of us could've/would've even attempted what he did? Exactly. None of us. We should be grateful. I for one would welcome him back on to the board (bulletin!) with a virtual pat on the back.

You're my wife now! EOM

The president wants full steam ahead. If he found out about a 3 month delay to wait for new Chairman of EDM, i reckon he'd be irritated. Someone in contact with him needs to inform the president so he can sign the letter of support. It's called delegating up and he'd probably be thankful to the smart guy/girl that accelerated his campaign commitment on Electricity by 3 months.

Avery, did they get back to you?

According to my new self imposed investing rules, I should be taking profit in INFA now having bought in at .24 and again at .5, but I recall several experienced investors whose opinions I respect saying 'let your winners run' and I feel this may be the first stock I've held since IQE where that applies. INFA was a joke for a long time. It is now a serious company, with a serious board of directors, a serious mission in serious times and partnered with some serious 3rd parties. We've the backing of an institutional investor in L&G, we have EU, UK, NI government support. Our BOD are buying stock on the open market at this level, especially our new, well connected, respected and experienced CEO. We own 100% of the project and we have planning permission. All complementary infrastructure for a Gas Storage facility either exists or will exist in the immediate vicinity and most important of all, it is really needed. In the words of Celine Dion - and I can't believe I'm quoting her - this is getting serious. I remain in.

100% imsl RNS lse.co.uk/regulatory-news-article.asp?ArticleCode=fx83rrov&ArticleHeadline=Acquisition_of_remaining_interest_in_IMSL_project

Sounds smart. If they get local engagement right, this can soar

Not a local. Just skim read through the previous years BB posts before investing. Nearly all of the opposition was directed at the wacky oil drill play in Woodburn. It was a car crash in local PR terms that current board would be well advised to read up on! Infratstrata may be new to them, but it's not well loved as far as I am aware. Maybe it's different in Larne, but Woodburn locals hated em and for good reason.

O and W, I'm long. Bought in before requisition, voted for AP and PW, watched sp go up and then down without taking profit. Sold at breakeven. Then bought back in at .24. and averaged up at .5. one risk that is very real and can be found by reading this very thread back to 2016-17 is local opposition, some environmental, some not on my doorstep.

Hear hear! Good job Adrian. Not easy at all. Remember where we were with the old guard?! Oblivion beckoned. To do what he and RTF did receive requisition took balls. And it took canny skill and determination to actually do the hard part which was to pull it off! It was always going to get worse before it got better. But we've weathered the storm.

John probably had support of 5% of company's shares (incl his own 3.7%), so may not have been as pleasant a transition as RNS makes out. However, great news and market seems to like it.

This term was ambiguous in the last RNS and of great importance. I therefore contacted the company to clarify. I am unable to disseminate the content of the reply but am happy to share the enquiry I sent​ in case others want to enquire for themselves. To save Judith's time,.please send exact same.msg so she can just copy and paste same reply.."So I am able to make an informed decision about my investment, can you explain what 'protected' means in this context? "the CAB has expressed the view that the proposed TSF location should be protected to secure reindeer husbandry." Does this refer to a biotope protection area? Is it an extension of Natura 2000? Or does the term carry less legal weight e.g. put up a fence? Put an airtight cover over it? This isn't clear. Thanks and kind regards..." I have reinvested all my TYM profits from 2.2p at 0.67p today.

Thanks Timmit

Do you have an email address? I don't like on unsolicited calls, and I'm sure he doesn't either.

Would value any intelligent thoughts on the planning permission question and the necessity to include total investment in mediapolis figure € in RNS... No one has mentioned these since yesterday's RNS.

Presumably the much vaunted planning permissions we had are now.worthless without the land or were those also assigned to buyer?

The thing that makes no sense to me is the need to include the amount invested in medialolis to date. That wasn't necessary or normal. It allowed for an immediate unfavorable calculation to be made by ANYONE. Why?

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=Astegiudiziarie.pck on map we are just to southeast of ivrea