RE: Majid Interview30 Jun 2023 09:44
tony, as i said they shouldn't have agreed to such loan covenants (if that's even true). and besides, i believe they did have the optionality (a word they love to use) to adjust the h2 development budget and maintain more of the dividend, alongside monthly payments. all investors are very aware of the lower o&g prices, and as a rather large pi i would say a mgt team that has our interests in mind would / should cut the dividend last / least after looking at all other options, of which there are many.
i believe a dividend that is maintained or decreased by 10-20% at most, and paid monthly, would have us sitting a couple of pennies higher. this would be less bad for us of course (because of the higher sp), but more bad for iis and funds if mgt are tapping them for acquisition cash and they want cheap shares and warrants even cheaper. but instead mgt halved the dividend, and went to quarterlies.
why? the untrusting pessimist in me says such punitive measures toward their pi base could almost be seen as a way to engineer a lower sp to let their banker mates pick up a lot more shares at 11-12p. if you're a fund / ii you won't mind the decreased divi and sp as much when you can supplement your position with tens of millions of cut price shares on the back of an acquisition. we of course don't have the luxury of bottomless pits of cash so will need to be diluted, and sit back and wait another 1-2 years for the sp to recover.
finally, how mgt can speak of acquisitions and protecting the balance sheet in the same breath is beyond me. how does one square with the other if they intend to take on more debt and dilute us further? also, if the intention is to keep growing production, but now by acquisitions, then why are we still assigning so much development budget and growing by 1kbopd (on the back of a record year of growth). surely keeping production flat, or even letting it decline by 1kbopd, and stating development funds will be put toward the dividend and keeping greater optionality for acquisitions would be better...? it would mean the sp is higher to begin with, which in turn means any raise price would result in less dilution. but that of course is good for pis, and not iis / funds.
it's because of these reasons and the bald faced 'priming' majid did in his interview that it's starting to stink of them having deliberately destroyed shareholder value to give their mates another round at the trough. if this happens then you know what kind of mgt we have here. let's hope it's not what they have been up to, but it's the only reasonable explanation for them having killed the dividend. the whole loan covenant excuse is either unbelievably sloppy (given their love of 'optionality) or they're lying. i've worked with snr mgt in listed companies for long enough to have developed a nose for duplicitous ****talk, and their words are starting to stink. get used to being in the teens for years people. the best ting that could happen now is a t/o offe