Ctag media platforms28 Feb 2025 16:06
Enlightening to read the various media platforms: The WhatsApp group ‘#CTAG Discussion’ that was initially set up by Chandra now sees several of them today throwing their toys out the pram, courtesy of two main issues (a) the lack of updates & (b) ‘who elected you as a representative’.
(a) With respect to the lack of updates , all shareholders have been kept informed of the broad outlines on the progress of the legal initiative thru the posts on LSE & of some updates to ‘#CTAG Discussion’.
I for one have always given my apologies to my own close peer group and they like every other shareholder (irrespective of wether they participate in seeking a legal disclosure) have then been able to read the broad outline of what is occurring via my posts on LSE ie. that (i) correspondence with Amit has occurred, that (ii) 14 emails from legal team were redirected by the recipients mail accounts to their Spam folders & that (iii) some case sensitive legal breaches on some new concerns affecting shareholders had occurred last week and that they were being assessed this week. My own peer group have then usually immediately phoned after each post & then expressed their gratitude that the litigation group organisers are actively pursuing this. At this critical stage, this then is all that the 3 Group Litigation Order organisers are really permitted to say ie. to give broad outline only. And the feedback is twofold: my peers are pleased & there is then always an increase in class action participation following these uodates.
The following comes via Mr.Cotter : ‘we move into a critical stage where key information regarding the litigation may reach Amit through various channels, so all further communication will now come exclusively from Michael Cotter to those involved in the case.’
Part of the role of the Group Litigation Order organisers has been one in which to help facilitate the flow of information (whilst Michael and his team help coordinate our responses). This information as Michael states above, is currently critical to the litigation process, hence any group that has direct affiliation to Amit’s close associates, can therefore reasonably expect to be limited in their access to any critical data.
Mr.Cotter states that Amit will receive his copy first (this also meets a recent request from Amit to prevent ongoing legal matters from being publicly aired) but that once Amit has received this, then Mr.Cotter’s clients can then receive their copy, for keeping in strict confidence. And yes .. several of whom are in Chandra’s WhatsApp group (50% of whom still believe in Amit’s Xmas post),
(b) ‘Representative’ noun : One that serves as an example or type for others of the same classification.
Lol.. This particular representative is Not then a representative of the 50% of Chandra’s group whom currently still believe in the tooth fairy.
One strongly believes one has been a victim of fraud. He/shedoes not need