The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
Could be fair to say, that more than one appears to be rattled, with what is on the menu for next week :
"..Just spoke to Amit. He told me contacts will start tonight.."
& those still coherent, would be recognising that this is a Friday evening.
With next week's 99.99% Guaranteed instalment of further pics,
then now rather hoping that the exposure is more focused on the address as seen at the bottom of the menus.
Excellent piece of proactive involvement by one of the twitter crew . It is very appropriate that Amit Ben-Haim’s life and its collateral are now actively highlighted, irrespective of what he is yet again promising.
Ctagexpose. @ctagexpose
#CTAG
A shareholder has sent me the following message. If we don't hear from the agent by Monday evening, I'll expose the name of the shareholder who sent the message and share more pictures.
_______
Hi
Just spoke to Amit. He told me contacts will start tonight and will continue into next week. Can you
hold off until then?
===============
Exactly 6 months ago, the funds were available for distribution :
2nd November 2023 : '..The appointed agent will commence the distribution process during the week commencing 13 November..'
21st November 2023 : '..is pleased to confirm that the appointed agent for the distribution began its proceedings on time, during the week commencing 13 November..'
30th January 2024 : '..The paying agent processing the payment transactions are experiencing difficulties reconciling the number of shares in issue due to miscalculation from a UK broker..'
The regular consistency of the falsehoods, then suggests, nowt is imminent.
Lol but as much as i dislike your abrasive outlook on life, it is at least a very consistent and hence honest (from your perspective) outlook.
Infinitely more honest than the inconsistency seen in upsidedownwoman, with her constantly changing resolutions. A weak and fickle mind which then so easily succumbs to woke’s rather placid reasoning.
& with the standard of proof in civil cases being ‘the balance of probabilities’ whilst for a criminal case there is a standard of proof that must be ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ which might then be within reach, if we all took woke reasoning as today’s standard of reasonableness. Worth a try ? Lol
Chinese style…. 5000 years past its sell by date.
Difficult to work out which proof did JD easily acquired ?
It certainly can not be proof of a good result.
As he believes at 09:07 that he only “thinks” there might be a result here, which is certainly an opinion that is not conclusive & therefore devoid of any access to verifiable proof..
One doesn’t need to demand anything or exert any leverage on anyone, courtesy of allegedly ‘having sufficient enough invested and having sufficient enough information’ to then obtain proof of Amit Ben Haim’s proven track record of falsehoods.
It’s beyond a joke when it becomes pitiful.
Amit Ben-Haim, would then need to seek redress for his alleged ‘loss of reputation’ with a Civil law case.
The proper standard of proof in civil cases involving dishonesty “is the simple balance of probabilities, neither more nor less”.
& with his consistent falsehoods he would be laughed out of court.
Pitiful is the mind that still thinks his name commands respect.
Yes, the probability exists that there could eventually be a payout, that the 7 year old algorithms and their data banks, might then warrant commercial value.
Does an eventual financial return for shareholders then warrant that all of Amit Ben-Haim’s past falsehoods get deleted ?
Some will learn from the experience and treat him with the total lack of respect, that he lawfully deserves.
‘.. also the culprit has published untrue material online that adversely affects ‘many’ person's…’
And has recently been in the process of deleting his falsehoods..
Thanks Whispering, it's good to throw out the wild cards occasionally and watch what gets turned up. Appreciate the insight on the SFO. Hopefully they will be getting active.
In the meantime... any chance you can pass me Shlomo's work address ?!
Lol, but its nice to have a few irons in the fire.
Again, thanks.
Ps. & yup, I'm really not interested in what ABH family consider to be harassment.
In my book, ABH's appalling treatment of shareholders,
then incorporates collateral damages.
But fingers crossed and Shlomo will then step up and sort out his miscreant brother.
Thank you Whispering,
that is the most coherent; logical and consistent, argument that you have yet posted.
That's appreciated.
And yes my apparent 'beef' is that you now daily take centre-stage with these illogical comments, whilst the rest of the shareholders are unanimously in support of trying to seek the truth of what is going on, by any means and without glibly resorting to "soz, it's all NDA".
And so who recently quoted…
‘play the ball and not the player’ ???
Its perfectly acceptable if you are not then able to clarify or justify any of your arguments.
Difficult times for all LTH. Some though try to seek a resolution.
“.. I doubt the SFO would be too concerned re my ‘illogical opinions’..”
Why on earth would the SFO consider your opinions ???
Again, this is totally illogical.
“..nor be influenced by strict NDA’s to which Cloudtag adheres..” and again and again… illogical.
IF the SFO wish to question Amit Ben-Haim on the origins of the deposited $50M, then of course they will not be influenced by any quotes of “soz, we can’t tell you.. its NDA”
*find myself
Appropriate steps have been taken Whispering and it is nice to see that several others have also taken up the chalice of trying to right Amit Ben-Haim's wrongs, by several different approaches. The more the merrier.
You have it wrong Whispering, that 'on this subject we can agree to disagree', as I facing myself constantly disagreeing with your opinions, which I tend to summarise as totally illogical. The agent/s being restricted to your quoted "NDA clauses" is sadly comical. It is totally illogical, as are your arguments to support any of your opinions.
*Shlomo
Anybody got his email address or is that also.. NDA ?
"..Idiots on twitter making declarations of trying to contact his family?..''
I fully support this approach.
Many many good peeps are contemplating that Amit Ben-Haim has a serious mental problem. There is factual evidence that shows that 50% of the notifications that he issues are falsehoods. That he has been consistently reckless with the truth is a known established fact. The supposition is, that he needs looking after.
Who better to do this than brother Shalom Ben-Haim with has access to the facilities to allow ABH to get proper treatment ?
The last ‘agent’ working for the company was Cairns in their capacity as Nomad. And who then abruptly cancelled any further dealings with CTAG, effectively removing the company from a London listing.
What then was the ‘recklessness’ seen by the Nomad, which warranted them abruptly pulling the plug on Amit Ben-Haim ?
Possibly a similar performance perhaps to that which he has repeatedly delivered to shareholders…
I would suggest that the agent is none other than SB Corporate Finance Partners Limited.
That Amit Ben-Haim’s company, which has only 1 sole director on its books ie ABH himself, is then doing the financial management of offshore funds, the origins of which, is at best, questionable.
A question for the FCA perhaps ?
Is it normal practice for one of their registered UK financial management companies to then act as regulatory overseers for their own off-shore transactions.. ?