Member Info for dougb189

So the very fact that you could not answer a straight forward question with either a yes or a no, then sees you threatening a ‘libellous’ response ?!

That speaks volumes of your delusional disorders.

So…. Were you threatened or intimidated by Amit or any of his cohorts ?

That glib statement simply proved that you are incapable of being honest.

Delusional.

‘He scared you years ago and you've been making a million excuses for him ever since’

“..You’ve referred back to an event of 2018…which was when I met Amit along with Tim at a shareholder meeting…”

So again once more you prevaricate and do not answer the question. Instead then giving yet further misdirection and going off at another wild tangent of ‘other shareholders bad behaviour’.,

Can you simply answer the question : were you in any way threatened by Amit or one of his cohorts c.2018 such that you felt intimidated ?

952 Cloudtag shareholders previously agreed to Tim acting as spokesman for their interests. There are then only 45 shareholders who have withdrawn either their support or likely that their email addresses have been cancelled. It is then a fair assumption to state that Tim is an approved representative of the shareholders.

IF Amit was in agreement to a meeting with Tim and 2 or 3 other shareholders who satisfy Tim’s requirements for being honest, trustworthy and are with a balanced perspective, that this limited group could then sign legally binding NDA’s that meet Amit’s requirements for security. There would hopefully then be verification of a reputable 3rd party oversight. There should be no strict NDA’s required for company accounts, simply the details of the $50M having been deposited & transferred to the agent. If Amit is legit he would not be paranoid on sharing a viewing of a healthy company account with 2 or 3 accountable representatives from shareholder group.

Having spoken with Tim on several occasions I know him to be of honest character. If a meeting then takes place and Tim states he is satisfied that Amit is above board, and that these delays were not deliberately orchestrated I would accept that.

My concern is that Amit has been delaying the distribution process for his own profit, which I have previously openly raised to both him & the SFO, which then gets a semi-quasi legal reply via the next company notice. I would have to either look in this man’s eyes to determine if he is telling the truth or would rely on Tim’s judgment as to whether or not Amit’s recklessness with the truth has a more sinister outlook.

For Whispering/ Wakey / Tracey to then suggest that Tim might have ulterior motives then falls into line with my most recent assessment of her, that she is not a trustworthy or honest person.

Will Amit respond ? IF the deals are fraudulent then very likely he will not as obtaining a reputable 3rd party verification will be the main issue for shareholders, or IF as I suspect there are shenanigans going on with deliberate delays occurring then I suspect he might then try to meet up and play another sucker card (as per the 20 false company notices). And of course IF he is actually legit with an unlucky choice in agents, then he would surely welcome the chance to lift his tattered reputation off the floor…

So today marks the end of ‘several days’ which ABH had stated on Monday 8th, was for the “need to reschedule the notification of licence fee proceeds by several days, and the company will update shareholders about this accordingly.’’

So with no company Notification this pm, it then becomes the first of likely 3 false statements directly coming from the 20th such Company Notice arising since 2nd November which have directly posted false statements of distribution actions starting or commencing with respect to the $50M Licence fee.

The 2nd & more pertinent falsehood though for the Notice is that quoted “Company expects to reach a smooth conclusion to both of these transactions during July 2024”. When as all strongly suspect, Amit’s idea of ‘smooth’ simply appears to be one orchestrated delay then smoothly flowing into the next orchestrated delay.

The 3rd falsehood in the notice then being “the Company recognises that the licence fee notification process was due to commence today. However, with the DaaP transaction now due for announcement in July, it was necessary to pause these notifications”.

‘necessary to pause’ yet in his own words, the two fees are totally separate arrangements and that the only common factor in these two proceedings is then Amit Ben-Haim who has consistently delayed any distribution proceedings having incompetently failed to carry out sufficient due diligence or regulatory compliance, as noted by the SFO’s interest in his lack of accountability towards the distribution process.

Last year’s delays initially saw a ‘technical hitch’ which was then immediately followed by a self-induced delay incredulously asking DaaP buyer to delay purchasing, allegedly for Amit to gain an extra 2% on the US$ value (minus 4% & still dropping on the shareholders UK£ value) and yet again we hear Amit Ben-Haim quoting further ‘necessary delay’.

Will one see a hat-trick of false statements originating from a single company notice (there’s been several notices posting two such falsies) &/or will the arrival of a 4pm notice today then yet again obfuscate proceedings & responsibilities : the ‘agents are commencing..’

In hindsight bud, i would have suggested that this also got directed to both the FCA & the SFO.

There are serious concerns that $279.5M which is owed to the shareholders is then being deliberately delayed.

With again no further explanation or any 3rd party verification then the authorities need to be kept regularly in the frame and see the full scope of the fraudulent behaviour.

One should not even consider being nice with Amit Ben-Haim.

The gamble was 6 years ago & then written off.

It was then only in the last 2 years that this was then resurrected by several peers informing me.

It’s then not all about the cash, there’s a game being played

And Amit has been playing outwith the rule book.

& that’s my kind of game too.

Lol but definitely More Sweeney than Ms.Marple.

“But what can you actually do to change events?”

Exactly the same as any other genuine shareholder and that is to raise complaint to the authorities. The results of which were then already pre-forecasted on this bb prior to the event then creating a result. Okay so the results so far have been quite small but they are still significant in that it tells you that Amit has to conform to certain metrics and that the authorities are now watching this.

I will leave the “writing this off / calling it a day” to the meak.

And IF i do then get to achieve a decent result, either porridge for Amit or pennies for PI’s it then sadly means you won’t have nowt to plezure yerself over. Lol but just now and the way it’s looking you are looking at low odds on that. But those low odds won’t come about until Amit gets further squeezed.

So the most vocal & ardent of Amit’s cheerleaders are also the most meak. Who will wait patiently for a payout & if nothing then materialises will :

Chandra ‘call it a day & walk away’

Wakey ‘write it off’

1984 ‘pleasure ma self’

Lol.

Lol, seeing as how you are now also nit-picking : “Two days ago and it was an incredulous *question implying* that ‘shareholders raising concerns with regulators are likely responsible for all the delays’..” So literally the same meaning.

I indeed might not know the reason for the continued can-kicking but i have at least tried to consider all the various possibilities.

I then refuted your initial suggestion of delays due to ‘NDA restrictions’ on account of the funds being released from escrow and therefore beyond the buyers immediate control. Likewise your suggestion that the agent/s are now in control of proceedings & just being awkward is also similarly rebutted & then your implied Pi’s delayed the process by complaining too much. Not even worth rebutting.

You then refuse to consider the one remaining option, that Amit has acted outwith the shareholders interest and is delaying proceedings to facilitate his &/or others interests.

I have then suggested directly to Amit & the SFO that there may be a collusion between the CTAG funds and those funds which were needed for Impulse Dynamics & that they originally acquired via hedge funds by what they allege was ‘fraudulent practice’.

These are then very serious allegations & contrary to your thinking that Pi’s have delayed proceedings, i have generally been able to initiate a quick response from Amit via company Notices that then placates the regulators, for a limited period of time. That 6 weeks of radio silence was then resolved one week later. Amit has to then respond, simply because of the numerous notices providing significant evidence against him.

And as per today’s expected delays, he has simply again found room to manipulate further delays.

Sounds as if someone is clutching at straws ;

Two days ago and it was an incredulous ‘shareholders raising concerns with regulators are likely responsible for all the delays’.

Now it is the licencing fee agent dictating terms who are allegedly ‘responsible for delays’.

An agent whom Amit refuses to name.

Amit is solely responsible for the fiduciary duty of acting honestly and not to make any unauthorised profit from his position. He has totally failed in his duty of care as seen by the lack of any due diligence with the distribution process as not one UK broker has been contacted.

There has been no due diligence carried out to date, which then makes a complete mockery of there then being ‘a smooth conclusion to both these transactions’.

July then sees a partnership for the two separate ‘agents’ whilst August then sees us back at square one, with ‘notifications to commence’.

“..: 20 false statements of ‘commencing’ Today. 12:21

So what’s the current odds for #21 to be released at 4pm..”

Again his ‘delays’ are extremely predictable, almost down to the hour. This is the core of the concerns raised with regulators and was then noted by them.

Today’s #21 “ However, with the DaaP transaction now due for announcement in July, it was ‘necessary to pause’ these notifications.”

We then have false statement #22 arriving c.Friday pm :

“Company will now need to reschedule the notification of licence fee proceeds by several days”

With #23 then arriving late July.

24June. “Either we get the portal link today or we call it a day and choose our own paths”

Appears that Chandra then opted for following the bumble bees erratic paths..

Not sure that his honey will ignite the motors to get his rocket to the moon. Lol would be significantly better trying methane.

A schadenfreude sheep, who’d have thunk it.

Your bleats throughout all of last year was gloating at Pi’s suggestions of UK regulatory interest.

Your bleats have not changed.

What nonsense are you bleating now Spikey ?!

“..if you want the protections of UK law and UK regulation, by and large you should stick to investing in UK companies..”

Somewhat strange bleating for even the slowest of sheep.

Some Pi’s had indeed written this off shortly after getting removed from the markets. A tactic that is often accredited to the FCA instigating where no Nomads are then available and so quite rightly imv most Pi’s then wrote this off.

That a later more recent public announcements of X $M’s owed to shareholders is then not to be written off but simply followed through to its logical conclusion; either it is fraudulent Notice or else it is being fraudulently delayed.

And for that possible latter scenario you repeatedly bleated on about CTAG being beyond the reach of any UK regulators. Now once more you again refine your ‘regulatory jurisdictions’ bleatings.

So what’s the current odds for #21 to be released at 4pm..

If it was as simple as PI’s acting like sheep then we’d all have fallen asleep a long long time ago. Now we fall asleep reading Spikey’s daily procrastinations that CTAG Pi’s are all simply stupid sheep. Yawn.

Lol, but thankfully these wee shoulders have carried a lot worse.

‘and equally mythical’ but was then in direct correlation to the also equally mythical but extremely lucrative heart monitoring technologies then advanced by Professor Shlomo Ben-Haim and still being lucratively advanced albeit now with the business / financial side of those established medical businesses being questioned on their integrity with respect to raising additional fundings.

The calculated risk on the punt is at that time is then inclusive of a decent pedigree but was then an unknown imo just how far off the rails that Amit had actually gone.