Member Info for 13thmonkey

what's the point? in that 24-48hr timeframe you could have easily picked it up. It tells you that you were safe to see others 24-48 hours ago, but nothing about how you are when you get the text.

There's a product, demand and funding to purchase, and we're a low enough mcap that it will make a huge difference, that will tell you where it is possible to go over the medium term, in the short term anything can happen. So figure out if you believe the story going ahead is feasible and materially important and make your decision, based on your timescales, If this were a large pharma it might make a 10% difference to their bottom line so the story is not as material.

demand yes, but if both are accurate then why would you buy the test that takes 2 hours and needs equipment/lab? Vs 2mins and no lab.

whilst it is still common in the wild there is no point with weekly testing, the amount you could spread it if you caught it the day after the test makes that pointless, therefore daily testing is more like what we need, or at least daily testing before being stuck in a room with others for extended periods. There will be a need for stupefying quantities of tests.

No idea, but boohoo that I got in at 30p and sold at 60p thinking it can't go much further than that is well beyond £3, so a 10x rise for something that sells cheapish fashion... they have an mcap of 3.7b was 400m when I brought in, so if they can do it, what about something that is essential?

everything is 'all potential' except that tests are showing that it works and works quickly and accurately? So that's product, and there is a need, and a nearly bottomless pit of money to pay for said need, how much closer to being beyond 'potenial' do you need to be. Where else have you seen more solid positions? Everyone's future sales are just 'potential' I assume you've been around the block a bit and have made money off companies that are beyond potential, except that in those circumstances the sp is generally not going to move is it.

I think that the general message is that we're getting nothing, and it's all represented in the books. The thoughts that there should be some material benefit was triggered, from memory, by there being something of step change in the valuation of PHE or W2T, but that all happened after we broke ties. That's my reading of it anyway.

surely 'igrowmoney' with the potential impact of the covid testing the other stuff is less relevant for the next 6-12 months, longer term it could be massively important, but right now covid testing dwarfs it.
As always DYOR

New boy, at 30p a unit that's a 120kwh battery, no one has one of those, at 5 pounds for a fill up elsewhere that would be around 4p a unit no one is charging that little, not even night rates on economy seven and even if they were it would take 3 days to fill up at 7 hours a night. Do you want to try some more realistic figures?

Both of which make the grid situation worse and require more of a buffer or supplement.

Credibility is spiraling down the toilet bowl.

If it were a HCID then it could only be treated in HCID facilities, it needs to be outside of that and is being treated as such it's beyond HCID, in many ways.

Andle, how many pandemic outbreaks have managed animals caused? How many have been caused by the close association with wild animals including their blood, guts and faeces?

It's not bats as such, it's how we interact with them, don't butcher or eat the diseased ones and you'll be fine, this can be done by not eating them, or in fact not eating any animal that is not managed. It does not need species being wiped out. Mucksy you are showing your level of thinking, at least it's shown me who is worth listening to.

20,000 excess deaths from covid vs 8,000 excess deaths from flu, just keeping it down the 2.5x the number of excess deaths, so yes they have modelled whether these deaths are excess and therefore would not have happened anyway.

These measures will make it take longer to combat which is the point of flattening the curve, it will be less damaging in terms of loss of life, but the effect will go on for longer.

generally speaking science defends evidence not 'thoughts' so pons and fleichman (sp?) thought they had cold fusion, there was no evidence, no repeatability, those with evidence generally win, it might take time, but it generally works. The recent italian claim of faster than light neutrinos was examined the data won out. Any examples of scientists who continue not to be believed with evidence to support them?

There are 'view points' and 'opinions' which have basis in science and reality and could/should be read, and then there is lizard people which is not valid, ditto with the earth being 'bigger/flat' chem trails etc. all conspiracy rubbish, not reading about it is not being closed minded, it's just being aware that it's rubbish and filtering it out.

I'd average down a little, buy another 10-20k shares, pending no other news i'd still feel that we had a good shot at making this work, and the world will recover or we'll be eating the neighbours and money will be irrelevant.

Anyone who says that they believe David Icke's 'stuff' has clearly stated how they view the world and how much critical thinking they apply.