RE: Uranium23 May 2024 22:38
GMET have the newsflow at the moment and the average AIM punter loves that. GMET looking very solid at present and DoD funding looking a very big possibility. POW a little quiet at the minute whilst their heads are down sorting out Uranium deals, Saudi IPOs, GSAe revenue streams etc. I would imagine. POW a different kettle of fish now. They are not a licence accumulator anymore and these bigger deals take time I imagine.
But are POW actually quiet when they hold 51% of GMET? That's the model at play here. Let the spin outs have the firework moments whilst it all cost POW 0 pounds, 0 pence and 0 time! GMET doing nothing wrong at present and that's all for POW's benefit as the controlling shareholder.
That's what I hope Sean is positioning POW to do with their Uranium assets. Get someone to partially take ownership of some or all of the U assets in an initial lucrative deal for POW where POW also hold a % of those Uranium assets moving forward on a cash free ride basis. That's what was effectively planned with the UEE IPO anyways which is currently taking a backseat. Now Sean has indicated on the RNS at the end of March 2024 that a better deal is now on the table for POW holders. That deal almost certainly won't involve POW raising £5mil to explore those U assets which is the minimum amount that would be need to make a dint on those assets. That's a high risk, dreamland investing strategy which happens in many other AIM listed juniors and sorry to spoil the ending, bit it tends to end in tears 99.99% of the time. I'd sell my entire POW holding tomorrow if that was announced as the plan.
All about doing the opposite to those around you at the minute. POW acting in the total opposite fashion to their peers with this model, so I'm happy as a contrarian to also do the opposite to the average AIM punter and back POW at this "grotesquely undervalued" level as PJ put it on X a few weeks ago . Time will tell who's right.