RE: Nigel's 'retirement'26 Feb 2026 17:15
Couldn't agree more with the posts here.
Nigel has always been on planet Gaga as regards shareholder value..
I've no idea what he thinks a reduction from 30p to 0.5p is. Even if you take it from 6p level (pre Viagra hype)
I'm still sceptical about him filing the FDA for Nanogenics. There is simply no record of it. It would be absolutely outrageous if he hadn't but who knows.
But what I do know that he failed in his fiduciary duty to update shareholders about it in any shape or form.
Trying to be fair to him, he has put a team together that appears to have the makings of a successful company with the new CEO. The tech looks like it could be groundbreaking.. but as people have alluded to, it would have taken years and mass dilutions to get anywhere.
Like in any successful business you need a leader with authority and gravitas. Got a feeling that the Pharma world just didn't see it in Nigel.
Good try Nigel, but up to now a disaster in shareholder value.