Watch the latest episode of focusIR Fireside Chats: Why Edinburgh Investment Trust Is Backing Turnaround Stocks for 2026 Growth. Viewhere
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Started: willhi02, 30 Jun 2026 18:44
Last post: Seadoc2, 1 hour ago
Bash described it as a 'technical loss', which it certainly isn't, as the company isn't making any operating profit. In fact, an operating loss of over £2.6m+
You won't get any sense out of those three I'm afraid.
Residing in premises paid for by VLRM, driving a car paid for by VLRM, taking an annual salary of over 100k - this is a lifestyle company.
Bash, Dom-Bella, PP1 are you not yet a little bit worried? You are being taken for a ride - and it isn't a ride in the companys fancy new car.
You can literally get a Porsche Macan for less than half they're paying.
https://www.selectcarleasing.co.uk/car-leasing/porsche/macan-electric/suv/265kw-100kwh-5dr-auto-rear-wheel-drive?mileage=5000&term=36&initial_payment=12
Is Gary cruising around in a Ferrari?
At £1500 exc VAT a month it's not a Dacia Sandero
You can see from the timing on December they took it out and thought they had the money coming in from QGP so started spending it before it arrived .
Unusual for a company that operates in El Salvador to need a UK based car
Started: takecare, 26 Jun 2026 07:47
Last post: tavilad, 20 hours ago
The Telegram group I’m on doesn’t allow comments at the moment, is there another one?
Good spot - another potential revenue stream dead.
I think you are talking to a wall pointing out this fundamental flaw in the QGOLD pricing that you can't sell what is supposed to be backed by a real world asset at far higher than will ever be worth.
Surely if QGP have genuine billions in gold assets, then they must surely know that gold in the ground is not worth the same as mined processed gold for sale. There is no addressable market for that at the same price level.
VLRMs MOU with FCM appears to have collapsed and they are unable to provide the funding and they have announced a deal with nGRND for a tokenisation deal. Whilst the full details on the deal have not been announced yet, nGRND states their tokens are priced at 10% of the value of spot gold. I have also seen figures of $20-30/oz mentioned unofficially. Somewhere between these points is probably fair value.
Can you help me with these points Bash?
Yes the agreement is that one token is worth one ounce of gold - QGP then give VLRM the amount of tokens that would be worth 13.975 mil USD at that time - this will obviously fluctuate as the price of gold fluctuates. The issue being VLRM then holds a bunch of tokens that they cannot realise into actual FIAT unless there is a viable secondary market. Given then QGP need the cash from these tokens to fund the mining of the gold in the ground and they are giving away 13.975mil worth of tokens a quarter without any cash coming the other way how do they fund the mining? They would require a substantial primary issuance via VLRM markets. But what investor would buy unmined gold - assuming all the risk - for the price they can buy mined gold in the form of Tether gold or such-like?
People getting my posts removed so I'll simply post it again...
...I wonder if we will see a TR-1 drop tomorrow...
Started: willhi02, 24 Jun 2026 21:59
Last post: crawshaw, 5 days ago
Thanks Gav - really insightful.
Or not verified as the case may be.
When the gold is verified
Well they told us 6mil of the 20mil USD WAG1 issue was already secured via Institutional Investors. Question is does the remaining 14mil need to come from retail or have they been working to seek more institutional Investors to plug the shortfall? Is the 600k USD revenue this will generate for VLRM dependant on the full 20mil being subscribed to? I would assume so.
I'm unsure why the last placing was required and the board have conveniently failed to divulge the purpose. If all the revenue they envisaged in the first quarter was realised why scrape around for more cash? And when will the audit of QGP's mines be complete?
Question: how many monthly users does VLRM markets have?
Answer (my guess)- registered users <10, active users zero. Revenue for q1 will be close to zero too.
Started: crawshaw, 24 Jun 2026 13:29
Last post: crawshaw, 24 Jun 2026
Sorry, I'll correct myself, Valereum paid 'only' ended up paying Blubird $900k for this stake (still more than Marechale paid for the entire company).
Good to see some constructive input from LTHs...
How will the acquisition by Marechale Capital affect Valereum's 5.66% stake in Blubird?
Perhaps Valereum could update shareholders, and explain what benefit this stake offers for the $2.5m investment?
Marechale issued 23.7m shares to acquire Blubird. Do Valereum now own ~1.34m shares in Marechale?
At today's SP, they'd be worth circa. £107k which is a far cry from their $2.5m investment.
Marechale paid £415k for Blubird in it's entirely.
Valereum paid $2.5m as a "strategic investment" for a 'minority stake'.
You really couldn't make this up.
Wonder if we will be in receipt of an RNS on July 1st notifying us of a further change to QGP's holding during the month of June.....
Started: Peoplepower1, 5 Jun 2026 14:39
Last post: Isthisacult, 23 Jun 2026
Verified gold in them there hills! ⬆️
What a ride this is! Not long now for the grand finale!
At least they have understood not to use white text on a yellow background since the last issue.
Don't appear to have done anything else in the period though
Another excellent issue where we are notified, again, of the rebrand and how they are using real world images with the VLRM local imposed on top, WOW!!!
At least our head of El Salvador asks the important question "Is the value accurate?" when discussing investors questions around digital assets. Well putting that question on the current share price of VLRM the answer is No, it should be valued a lot less.
VOX Issue 5 today 🤩
Started: takecare, 3 Jun 2026 12:45
Last post: Cimbom, 4 Jun 2026
Millions of shares being moved around today
I don't think they have been scammed by QGP, I think they are all in it together. I think Gary knew the share price has to be above 40p to allow QGP to sell 1.44% of their holding and cover the cash coupon which is why he did so much paid publicity pushing the fact the 200mil investment valued VLRM at 400mil and that this was the biggest investment in an aquis firm ever. Thankfully investors largely saw this valuation was baseless and so didn't buy. Unfortunately some didn't and threw so much of their cash at it they were blinded to the facts.
Less than 48hrs to wait until Vox Issue 4 🤩
I'm keeping an eye on the metrikus audit hash. I'm sure it will appear on there at some point...
Following research which didn’t use AI but did require tea, here's what may happen next.
Valereum will announce that they have verified that gold is valuable (if QGP were to have some). They will conclude the QGP fairy dust reserves audited and find they do have access to billions of ounces of dust. They believe this dust to be fairy-derived. But it may be just dust. But billions.
They will then conclude that the deal is no longer what they said it was, but may not point out that this means it is what it obviously was all along - given the 2-person QGP was set up just months before this deal (being the only published activity they have ever done).
Encouragingly, they may also inform investors that the independent audit only cost £200k. While highly complex (involving staring at the ground and occasionally kicking it), it may also turn out that a company owned by Garys dog had just the required expertise to complete it for this bargain sum.
Started: Peoplepower1, 2 Jun 2026 18:17
Last post: willhi02, 2 Jun 2026
QGP have sold, their holding is now 243,234,439 as per the RNS, this is down on the shares given to them.
Go take your silly nonsense elsewhere because it's so obvious you never do any research at all.
Small correction to what Peoplepower1 (he's back!) wrote - The QGP audit may take up to 6 months because it is extremely difficult to audit fairy dust.
By the way, the reason for the placing is obvious.
Never get to the point where you need more money for the company when an audit is taking place, in case ,renegotiations are necessary.
The placing money will last for about 12 to 18 months ,so no more placings are imminent.
This is a high risk investment so don't invest unless you're prepared to lose everything.
Personally, I don't think it will come to that at all, this is my personal opinion.
The QGP audit may take up to 6 months because it is extremely difficult to audit paleo alluvial mining assets.
Do your own research always.
Started: Jamgoo, 18 May 2026 16:55
Last post: takecare, 2 Jun 2026
I suspect so many are down 90% plus that most think 'Well, I can't sell, I have to hope (against all odds) this will turn around. Which basically means Valereum BOD can keep placing and/or selling their basically-free warrants and continue to make money almost all the way to the share price hitting zero.
I hope that is not true. I think though that there will be a fair few in a similar hole and thus are now refusing to sell in the hope they can regain something. That is why I think we have hit the bottom here SP wise, as I expected this to drop further given yesterday's news of QGP selling. Unfortunately with VLRM having little to no revenue another placing will come around sooner or later and that will force the SP to drop. The other option of course is the beginning of the end...
Someone saying in one of the many Valereum telegram groups that Valereum makes up 90% of their investments and that they are £200k down. I doubt they are alone… I suspect many who got involved with this put most of their savings/pension into this dog. The BOD should be ashamed.
The 243k sale would allow them to buy a shovel to unlock that gold in the ground!
Don't be silly San, they've got $billions of AUM, and $billions of gold in the ground!
Have the board divulged how much of the negotiated down $300k was received? It does not sit well with me that we were told this would be paid and then just got an RNS saying partial amount had been received without telling us how much or when the full amount would be received.
‘An international accounting firm’ which will turn out to be owned by another member of Gary’s family or a connected party where we will never discover the real controlling interest. More cash extracted in fees but ‘oh dear, it didn’t pass due diligence’ so the deal is off. but fear not, we have a new shiny thing to distract you with.
The definitive agreement RNS states "An international accounting firm that specialises in digital assets with a global network has been engaged to lead the verification process". It doesn't say by QGP so it's fair to say that VLRM shareholders have paid for this with the last fundraise.
I have a few questions, but let me start with this - Who is paying for the verification process by the international accounting firm? The definitive agreement RNS does not state this.
Started: tavilad, 21 May 2026 10:34
Last post: jester16, 21 May 2026
Not until some good news comes. Hopefully qgp depart
Anyone know if that group will ever be active again?
Started: THECIRCUS, 19 May 2026 16:11
Last post: BashM, 19 May 2026
I understand the sentiment of a raise of 2p. I agree that is not the finest moment for the BoD. But this is not going bust or private. We do not have debt, owed to creditors. Gary and James have paid another £400k at 2p, I am sure that they haven't done that to lose money LOL.
QGP is a wait and see and rightly due diligence is taking time as it involves verification of significant asset value. No point us taking a load of VGold-Core tokens that have no underpinning value.
The BoD are aware they need to deliver. Revenues and outcome of QGP are key.
Taking a step back do the naysayers 100% believe QGP will not come good? Yes, there is a risk it goes tits up. But if it works out we have by the end of June $28m of VGold-Core tokens due to VLRM. The current MCAP at 2p is a joke in that scenario. Reward outweighs the risk. Additionally, we may get news on revenues from other sources including COIN GT. So those currently holding the choice is:
(1) Sell at a loss recover some capital
(2) Hold and potentially be rewarded
So lets await more news before speculating its game over etc.
@THECIRCUS it is good that you realise how bad the situation is and I hope you haven't lost more than you can afford to lose in those two years (pleny of people have way over invested from what I've seen). Unfortunately, there is zero chance of the accountability, transparency, and meaningful change you hope for. This company has only even been set up to do one thing, and it has done it very successfully. It is a money making venture for its BOD and their connections and family. Pivot after pivot, they have extracted huge amounts of money that investors have put into this. They will continue to do so as long as they can. It seems quite possible that if AQUIS have indeed clamped down on companies pumping as someone reported here (seems a very feasible explanation on why so little effort is now going into ramping now as well as closure of the Telegram group) then they are almost out of runway. The accounts will likely be brutal. Looking at todays low volume of trades, it is depressing to see most are very small value buys, suggesting individuals continue to put more money into this. Averaging down doesn't work if the ship is sinking.
I’ve been invested for over two years and supported the company through everything, but at this point I think some hard questions need to be asked.
A lot of the current messaging seems to be built on hope and hype rather than facts or delivery. Looking at the situation objectively, there are several glaring red flags that investors like myself can no longer ignore.
First, it’s becoming increasingly obvious that QGP likely doesn’t have the funding people assumed it did. If the money was genuinely there, this deal would probably have been completed a long time ago, rather than allowing the company’s position to deteriorate further.
Second, shareholders have repeatedly been given assurances by the board around valuation, value creation, runway, timelines, and delivery yet time and time again those expectations haven’t materialised. Confidence is inevitably going to erode when promises consistently fail to translate into results.
The biggest concern now is simple: what happens if this deal still hasn’t concluded in the next couple of weeks?
Realistically, the share price could fall significantly further, potentially towards 1p territory.
So I genuinely struggle to understand why some people remain overwhelmingly bullish despite the repeated pattern of hype followed by disappointment.
I’m also increasingly concerned about what appears to have been another low-ball placing that heavily dilutes shareholders while benefiting the usual suspects. Investors deserve transparency, accountability, and honest communication not endless speculation and vague optimism.
So many shares to hit and warrants to be exercised by whatever broker has helped them raise the money. Clearly and act of desperation and no strategic investment.
And finally, where has all the money from previous raises actually gone?
We were told these were investments, but many now appear to have been poor decisions involving investments into The CEOs own company Metrakus. And who exactly are “Liquid Assets”? What has Gary’s son done for the company to obtain all those warrants?
Please demonstrate the value.
Increasingly, it feels like a network of family and friends benefiting while shareholders have been taken along for the ride.
At this stage, this is no longer “deramping” — it’s acknowledging the obvious concerns many long-term shareholders already have. Instead of blindly accepting everything we’re told, shareholders should be demanding accountability, transparency, and meaningful change. Also what about all the announcements about Wageen and other revenue opportunities and multi million dollar investment conversations about investing into Valereum gone?
The company’s treatment and disregard for shareholders has become increasingly clear. The focus appears to be on protecting their own interests and products rather than delivering value to investors. I no longer recognise this company it lacks direction, execution, and credibility.
The accounts will be tel
Started: 2pr02p, 15 May 2026 08:24
Last post: milnrowmug, 18 May 2026
LonSouEas is a far from perfect site, they miss things. It is free, and well worth every penny.
You are here to watch the adverts, what don't you understand?
Why is it not appearing in the Live RNS section above? 🤔
Started: willhi02, 7 May 2026 12:42
Last post: jester16, 15 May 2026
Placing unbelievable.
Verification is taking sometime at least update shareholders and stop leaving them in limbo. First coupon should of been paid and not messed around with. Qgp have 49% of the company for what?
The new tagline "Value Unleashed"
Unfortunately, not for shareholders.
Https://vlrm.com/
Rebranded website now live.
That logo is the Telegram logo broken in half, they are mocking their faithful investors here with their 1990s Desktop publisher rebrand!
Started: willhi02, 29 Apr 2026 13:51
Last post: Peoplepower1, 3 May 2026
Oooops..... if my calculations are right this time ........ ?????
So, so sorry again, need to stick with the 25,000 VGOLDCORE tokens/ounces and not the 250,000 VGOLDCORE tokens/ounces ..... oooops ?????
So, the calculations again, for say, the 25,000 VGOLDCORE tokens for sale backed by, say, 25,000 ounces of gold bullion already held in vaults for the private issuance sale to Institutional Investors.
If my calculations are right this time, hopefully, then this would raise about $110m.
Using 50 Institutional Investors, at about $2.2 million each, would raise the $110m.
$110m raised in funds at $1,000 an ounce to mine would achieve 110,000 ounces mined, again, if my calculations are right.....
Then, you have 110,000 ounces of gold in gold bullion in vaults to use to back further release of VGOLDCORE tokens or, maybe, to sell some of this gold for the 10% to 15% yield for the VGOLD tokens.
110,000 ounces of gold is about $500 million, if, I have got my calculations right this time ........
So sorry again ........
Rough calculations and ideas .......
If you are posting, then give your reasons for backing what you have to say.
Tether gold started its life from what I can gather in 2014 in British Virgin Islands and has its licence in EL Salvador.
PP1 - Just get it through your head your never getting your money back here after buying at 12p plus, no matter how often and how much tripe you post on this board !
So sorry, that needs to read as 250,000 VGOLDCORE tokens/ounces and not 25,000 VGOLDCORE tokens/ounces
Started: Peoplepower1, 28 Apr 2026 20:25
Last post: Peoplepower1, 29 Apr 2026
A sand-based paleo-alluvial deposit is the most cost-effective way to mine gold because the ancient river has already done the hard work of grinding the rocks into sand for you.
Here's a simple version from the same link below about UMACO who have the 8.4 millions ounces in partnership with QGP:-
Think of UMACO as a company that has the keys to a giant, prehistoric savings account buried in the Australian Queensland dirt.
1. It’s like an Underground Beach
Instead of a tiny gold vein hidden inside a mountain, UMACO found ancient riverbeds (called Paleo-alluvials).
Imagine a beach from the time of the dinosaurs that got buried under hundreds of feet of soil.
The gold isn't stuck in hard rock; it’s just loose flakes sitting in the sand.
UMACO looks for Paleo Alluvial deposits.
These are essentially ancient, dried-up underground rivers.
2. The 8.4 Million Ounces
They didn't just find gold.
Their sand is full of other high-tech minerals used to make things like white paint, jet engines, smartphones, etc.
The Math:
They take the value of the Gold plus the value of the Tech Minerals.
The Result:
When you add them together, the total value is equal to 8,422,817 ounces of gold.
3. The Smart Vacuum
Traditional mining is slow and expensive because, for example, you have to blow up rocks with TNT., etc., etc.
UMACO uses Smart Mining:
They use sensors to see exactly where the gold is thickest before they dig.
They scoop up the sand and run it through a machine that acts like a super-filter.
It catches the gold and the tech-minerals and spits the plain sand back out.
It's cheaper because they are just moving sand, not crushing mountains.
4. The Stamp of Truth
To prove this isn't a fairy tale, they have an official JORC (Joint Ore Resources Committee) Report.
JORC is used by Australia and Australiasian to verify mining assets.
The Canadian equivalent to JORC is called N 43-101.
In the mining world, these are like certified bank statements signed by experts.
It proves to the government and to investors that the 8.4 million ounces are actually in the ground and ready to be picked up.
The Big Picture:
UMACO has 10 official tickets (permits) from the Australia Queensland Government to "clear" a massive ancient riverbed.
They’ve already proven it works by pulling out 254,090 ounces in the past, and now they are ready to go after the rest.
Started: Peoplepower1, 28 Apr 2026 14:32
Last post: Peoplepower1, 28 Apr 2026
It's a simple version of what's in this link:-
https://qgphotonics.com/blog/qgp-announces-formation-umaco-sp-ni-43-101-gold-assets-tokenised-mining-finance-vlrm
Thin air*
I don't understand the bullsh*t version. Waiting for you to post something factual that you actually personally researched. Not AI slop. It's boring & inaccurate. It's plucking things out of free air that are nowhere in the public domain.
So you don't understand the simple version ......
What it makes me understand is that all of your "homework" is AI generated garbage. You haven't done a single ounce of research except ask gemini (or other AI agent) to tell you exactly what you want to hear. How can you expect people to respect what you're saying when you're relying on this utter nonsense?
Started: Peoplepower1, 27 Apr 2026 16:44
Last post: takecare, 28 Apr 2026
@BashM why you posting? Like VLRM, buy more quietly and watch your holding drop to zero value. bye bye! (It’s not a very helpful post is it? I won’t copy you again if you promise to be just a little more thoughtful in what you write).
PP1 "Valereum is just at the beginning of its journey"
BashM "Clearly, its early doors"
Great input!
Last month they were telling us what a powerhouse Valereum are, talk of billions and trillions.
Let us know when the journey is due to begin?
BashM
Posted in: VLRM.PL
Posts: 957
RE: Lunchtime news 30 Mar 2026 11:01
San - I be surprised if they paid in VGold, as RNS was clear on USD or USDC. We know little about VGold and what will underpin its value
Always with Valereum there are ‘conversations’ about massive deals and encouraging MoU’s. But they never result in anything concrete or any revenue. I’ve had conversations about winning the lottery but it’s not actually going to happen. BashM good that you make no secret of the fact you’d like vgold tokens converted to something that actually has monetary value. Very sensible.
Started: Peoplepower1, 21 Apr 2026 14:11
Last post: Isthisacult, 27 Apr 2026
3p a good price. Sell while u can
Meant a lot less selling than before. Currently 33.33%.... That is painful
San
"Nice little pick up" - bid still 3.00 - Spread sits at 50%. Yikes.
Think of this as a high-speed digital bridge between a gold deposit in the ground and the global stock market.
To make it even simpler, here is how the "financial ecosystem" actually works in real life:
1. The "ATM in the Ground"
Normally, gold in the ground is "dead money"—you can't spend it until you dig it up, which takes a decade.
The Change: This system treats the 8.4 million ounces in the riverbed like a bank balance.
Because the gold is "audited" (checked by experts), Valereum uses it as collateral.
This allows them to create digital tokens that represent that value today, not 10 years from now.
2. Collapsing Time (10 Years down to 18 Months)
The "$50 billion funding gap" mentioned is a fancy way of saying: "Banks are too scared to lend money to new mines."
Old Way:
Mine owner spends 10 years flying around the world asking banks for money.
New Way:
They turn the mine's value into tokens and sell them on a public platform.
It’s like "crowdfunding" for a massive gold mine.
This gets the cash for the "smart equipment" in months, not years.
3. Why it’s "Programmable"
Imagine if a £20 note knew exactly who owned it and could automatically pay you a "bonus" every three months.
That is what programmable tokens do.
Automated Rules:
The tokens have the legal contracts "baked" into the code.
Royalties:
When the mine makes a profit, the "smart contract" automatically sends a slice of that profit to the token holders.
No lawyers or banks are needed to write the cheques.
4. The "Safety Bridge" (Valereum Plc)
This is the most important part for regular investors.
If a random person on the internet asks you to buy "gold tokens," you might worry it's a scam.
Valereum is a public company listed on a regulated stock exchange.
They act as the policeman.
They make sure the gold is actually there and that the digital tokens follow the law.
Summary:
The "Closed-Loop"
The Mine (QGP):
Has the gold in the river.
The Token:
Represents a "pre-order" or "share" of that gold.
The Market (Valereum):
Let's people buy and sell those tokens easily.
The Result:
The mine gets money to start digging immediately, and investors get a liquid asset that grows in value as more gold is found.
Nice little pick up over the last few sessions. Im still lost as to what VLRM are as a company. Is it all in vgold core tokens?
San
Started: willhi02, 24 Apr 2026 09:25
Last post: Peopleplougher1, 24 Apr 2026
Here is the thing, the actual product that VLRM has, VLRM Markets, they are not pushing for users. How many accounts do they have onboarded? Where is the push to onboard retail investors? Why is all the focus on this QGP deal that is very very sus. It is clear that VLRM require massive amounts of funding in order to achieve their goals with VLRM markets which is why they have pushed on with this deal with QGP which is very very sus and now looks to call in to question the financing they require to push the actual product. VGOLD-CORE will be so illiquid that I can see no way that VLRM can flip the VGOLD-CORE tokens to actual cash. Because of this they will need more funding sooner rather than later and this will only come as dilution for current holders, that will send the share price lower. I don't think the SP will ever get near 20p ever again without consolidation and even that is a big ask. I think we'd be lucky to see double figures. I think the Wageen token will be an indicator of appetite for VLRM markets and results for that will not be out till end of July. The big risk there is that should Wageen fail to hit their revenue targets and thus default on the tokens first time users of VLRM Markets may turn their back never to return due to association.
The board should have stood their ground in demanding the $3.9mil and when the $300k was not delivered the shares and warrants should have been cancelled. This has destroyed any sentiment and when more bad news ultimately arises around the QGP deal the share price will be destroyed (not that it already is).
Started: Isthisacult, 24 Apr 2026 07:52
Last post: Isthisacult, 24 Apr 2026
Remember when they said lloyds of london insured the deal?????? Hey bash
Started: Isthisacult, 24 Apr 2026 07:51
Last post: Isthisacult, 24 Apr 2026
Will this stock hit £1?
Started: crawshaw, 23 Apr 2026 13:41
Last post: crawshaw, 23 Apr 2026
BashM
Posted in: VLRM.PL
Posts: 957
RE: Lunchtime news 30 Mar 2026 11:01
San - I be surprised if they paid in VGold, as RNS was clear on USD or USDC. We know little about VGold and what will underpin its value,
Selected partners may offer promotions for new customers. We may earn a referral fee if you open an account
Follow the stocks
that matter to you
Create a free LSE account to:
Already a member? Log in
Create Free Account

