Member Info for takecare

The ‘I think we can squeeze another £500k out of this before it collapses’ raise. They are skilled at keeping this alive enough to pump another day, but i do think they are reaching the end of the runway now.

Correction to my earlier post - 1500% increase now needed to get back to the all time high SP.

Dom-Bella you don’t even try to make your posts logical or make any level of sense, do you? If you have an alternative POV with some basis in fact, please share it.

1250% increase will get you back to previous high.

Some more things that are believed to be true- Actual products exist (beyond white label wallet that are two a penny) , that there are employees beyond the BOD, that DMC was real, that James has invested millions of actual money, that being in a closed and carefully controlled telegram is a good ideal when investing…

That valuation isn’t based on anything but feeding people in that group that are driven by blind hope having already lost so much. It’s just part of the pump that creates enthusiasm that drives the price back up for a bit so the cheap options can be off loaded again before SP collapses. Rinse and repeat. Nasdaq listings, actual revenue stream, flying pigs, premier FC club interest, magic beanstalks, they believe the lot. Nothing will shake that LT faith until they have lost the lot and a few pumpers and the BOD have made a lot of money from that process.

They should have literally tens or even hundreds of dollars in transactions fees incoming once the wallet goes live in…. El Salvador. Great spot to focus, as gov.uk site describes - One of the main issues impeding El Salvador from reaching its potential is corruption. El Salvador scores a 33/100 in terms of corruption (where 100 is very clean and 0 is highly corrupt) and ranks 116 out of the 180 countries for the Corruption Perception Index.

A perfect fit for Valereum then.

I don’t personally believe there was ever a real £1m of actual money from James. More likely clever accounting, smoke and mirrors. Telegram group now suggesting a Nasdaq listing as an option. It would be funny if the impact on the mainly-novice LT investors wasn’t so devastating.

Dom-Bella I also don’t hold. Never have, never will. I started watching and commenting having seen a mate get horribly involved in this sham /scam. It is morbidly fascinating to watch how people get played, then time and again ignore the facts and buy into the hype once more in the hope of getting rich.

In the telegram bubble this morning, to counter all the excitement of seeing some event pics and ‘expensive suits’ in the (seemingly small) audience, this comment:

‘Whilst it's all good people showing activity and presence. A company needs to forcast earnings, what is 1 Tokenisation worth to us? What is the funnel worth?

Are we forecasting any income in 25/26 from markets?

These are the things that market needs to establish a base line. Once markets are up, what is the timeline for bridge show case? Has Vlrm priced the product ?’

What’s the chance of any of those fair questions getting answers?

It is just incredible that the telegram group take everything at face value and don't question anything they are fed. Didn't think to check who DMC were at the time of announcement despite a simple Google search providing pretty clear indication dmc had just been created for the purpose of the 'deal'. Now they are all ecstatic to have 'Carmen' on board who is apparently valereum's greatest achievement to date. Wow. Just check her linked in profile to see if that accolade matches her actual career history. Judge for yourself. It takes basically nothing to convince that group that all is fine and they will all be rich. They won't be. They are getting fleeced.

A rushed out RNS as an answer to growing unrest and calls for real answers on DMC (was it a real company/investor with any funds or track record?). 'Quick, let's release our white-labelled app. That should distract a few people from asking the actually important questions'. It will probably work too.

The funding may well happen. And if so there will be a frenzy of euphoria and likely the associated ramp price jump. Followed by a dump. Funding cleverness aside (still zero info on dmc) there really doesn’t seem to be a viable business. Just huge claims, a wallet to come (which are two-a-penny) and lots of complexity and time zones to deal with. Bless them. Smoke and mirrors galore with this company. This is not going to end well for the majority of those in the Telegram group.

I wouldn’t trust the answer even if I got a response. They have a vested interest to communicate in way that tries to maximise excitement and of course not call out if existing long term holders are getting the raw end of the stick!

Hi. Is there someone who understands the last RMS better than me (shouldn't be difficult, I'm no expert). This stuff is really confusing but interesting to try to follow. On the surface:

1. LT shareholders hold valereum PLC shares- has that holding just been diluted with the issue of 170m shares to a new entity Valereum Inc?

2. DMC Inc are only acquiring 20m of those shares.... who owns the rest of Valereum Inc?

3. It seems like the 4 strategic entities to be purchased will be owned via Valereum Inc (not PLC) so the current LT valereum PLC shareholders won't benefit from them at all, even it they are genuine businesses with actual revenue acquired.

Is it just me that this RMS reads this as NOT good thing for current shareholders? Seems like yet more overly complex company structure changes and I wonder what the motivation for that is? Who benefits for setting up this new 'shell' company rather than having investment direction into Valereum PLC?

If anyone does really understand what and why this has been done in this way, and can explain the implications for existing shareholders, it would be really interesting to read.

A new RNS and a new Valereum financial entity established! A google search for DMC markets Inc only brings up the Valereum announcements and a very spares linkedin page for them. That page has a website link that just diverts back to linkedin. Doesn’t fill one with confidence? Who has controlling interest of DMC and are there any links to Valereum? How would someone find out given little transparency or information about them?

But their company name has 'Inc' in it so it must be impressive and is a reason to get all excited about America!!! So as ever, the clueless LT shareholders are skipping for joy at this RNS! Still doesn't seem to be an underlying viable business with any revenue.

Based on latest RNS, look forward to the next one which will be HUGE:

Valereum today announce that Nick pours a nice cup of tea, and reports plans for a biscuit are progressing well for q2.

It would be funny if they were not taking so many people for a ride.

&DDDlondon is valereum part of a diversified portfolio for you? It seems to attract people less experienced in investing, so if that is you, just be aware it is super high risk and has a pretty dodgy history (which continues) so be very careful and invest only what you can afford to lose. And be sceptical of what anyone says (including me) but particularly within the closed telegram group which kicks people out if they ask anything that goes against the ramping. Good luck, hope you don’t lose too much if you are hoping this is a long term investment. If trading on moves/ hype, likely more scope to make money (still high risk). Doesn’t seem like there is a genuine business (certainly no revenue) more share issues and complex set of companies investing in each other, etc. People are making money, but mainly at expense of novice investors. Be warned.

Sanboy, when you say you can't complain at the new board and how they have performed, what is it exactly that they have done that creates value and impresses you? A few RNS's - new board announced (all good friends which warms my heart), share trading again now that the GSX deal is dead. Anything that moves this away from being a non-trading shell company? Anything that provides any clarity on a viable route to any revenue?

Let's asume they are actively mining now. Are they making money doing so? It's not a given it's profitable. Mining is not a license to print money, as its really resource intensive by designed.