Member Info for takecare

'Old management ' and 'legacy Warrant holders' to blame. Nothing is ever the fault of the current BOD is it, even though Jamie said he was working 'behind the scenes' years ago....

'even for a tech company' says BashM... Valereum being a tech company is pure fantasy. How many developers do you estimate they have? To the closest one? I'll save you some counting.... The number is zero.

Just take one point and say it's tripe because you say it ignores context, which it doesn't. On the 500 million shares in issue an ai assessment, as previously shared:

Is Valereum’s share count unusual? Yes — extremely. It is one of the highest on Aquis.

Is the share count justified by revenue? No — not even close. Revenue is so low that the share count looks disproportionate by any conventional metric.

Is the valuation justified by fundamentals? Not currently. The valuation is based almost entirely on future expectations and strategic positioning.

Is this pattern typical for Aquis? No. Even early‑stage Aquis companies rarely show this combination.

Valereum has been aggressively issuing equity to fund operations and strategic investments. This level of dilution is far above typical Aquis norms, where companies often issue smaller tranches (5–20m shares).

For the audience reading this, alongside reading some of the tripe posted by the those ramping/pumping this share - do please note the following :

(1) VLRM in its entire history has reported revenue of 135k, and it is not clear if this is revenue from operations. The last published accounts had just £19,272 in revenue.

(2) They are due the first interest payment from our institutional investors QGP by 29th March for a value of $3.8m. This institutional investor was set up under a year ago and has no history of doing any deals other than this one with Valereum,. Will the $3.8 show up a cash on the accounts?

(3) The BoD have recently removed 7.5m warrants to prevent SH dilution, having diluted the share massively and repeatably in the past few years. The 500m shares in issue is highly unusual so 7.5 million share warrants is inconsequential.

(4) VLRM has no debt , but based on last published accounts, Ahad just £19,397 in cash and admin expenses of £1.7m.

(5) QGP / CEO / Chairman today hold 60% of the 500m shares in issue.

(6) They are on the edge of finding out about a revolutionary VGold token, which is the latest buzz-wordy excitement generating pivot.

(7) They are listed on OTCQB, where so far 1 trade for £900 has been completed.

(8) There is ambition to list on the Nasdaq. There is also likely ambition to be the first company to land a person on Mars. Both equally credibly.

(9) We have a heavyweight NED on board, to support our ambitions in the US. And don't forget the Tiger!

(10) RWA and tokenisation is a rapidly growing. As is AI. Valereum have little to do with either.

All factual information, not made up theories :)

'Valereum Plc (the "Company" or "Valereum"), a company aiming to become the global market leader in the rapidly developing tokenised digital markets sector'. A very ambitious goal for any company. What is the credibility of that ambition? Are there any achievements to date that would suggest they have ANY chance of doing so? Or are they a company that keeps changing direction, only operates in El Salvador, only releases non-binding MoUs without ever providing updates on what has been achieved based on them, and to date has only tokenised the chairman's book rights? No credibility at all, on top of dodgy looking deals with newly established 'billion dolar' companies with godaddy websites they can't even keep online.

If this level of institutional level investment continue, this is well on it's road to recovery and there is nothing the market makers can do to keep this down any longer. Since 4pm, trades include one for 94p, one for 18p and a massive one of £3.35. Once there is a zoom call where Gary explains everything is fine, it's back on track for the moon. Because he probably won't say 'sorry everyone, we actually have been taking you for a ride, but we've been very careful so it's all legal, and although you have individually lost most of what you invested (or maybe soon everything), it's in the same 'small' category PP1 consider a $450k fraud, so you shouldn't be annoyed. Or maybe he will say that and end with: 'on the plus side, I've made loads!"

Pp1 ‘he just made a little mistake’. I’m surprised you didn’t claim it was an innocent mistake. It was only $450k. And how exactly do you know this? Did your boss Gary confirm it via email? You always ask for proof from others (always ignoring the proof and sources listed) how about you provide some proof of your assertions.

Sorry I misread your question. Great approach just suggest it’s a different Stephen fathers completely. One that is very non-fraudy. Any proof that the one related to Valereum is different?

@bashm some advise please. me and someone unrelated (me as husband/administrator and the other person wife/director) are thinking of doing some fraud. We want to keep it small so it doesn’t matter. How much is ok with you? I had been thinking of keeping it below $200k, but I now realise $450k is insignificant. Am I ok as long as it’s less than half a million?

Ps: proof you request is one being administrator and the other a director of the same company at the same address. What more proof exactly are you hoping for?

BashM is your argument really "the fraudulent behaviour by Geluk Capital was SMALL and only related to Douglas Fathers , and nothing to do with Stephen Fathers". Despite him being the executive DIRECTOR of Norwand Foundation and Douglas Fathers is the Executive ADMINISTRATOR of the same Nordwand Foundation (both of the same address).

What size of fraud would be sufficient that you would care?

And do you need to see them both sitting in bed together like Morecambe & Wise to consider them linked?

Do your emails to Gary start with ‘Dear boss’ tiger?

BashM- "Let me ask a very simple question of you so called clever folk. James Bannon owned 33% of the company prior to this deal and circa 18% now. How and why would he want to run this company to the ground? What would be his motive?? "

Simple answer: "If he can make a lot of money for himself and his associates through the process of doing so". There are lots of different ways to make money from a business, and not all of them are based on the success for the business itself as an on-going concern. Already, James and his crew are doing ok from this. As long as they can keep peoples hopes alive (and you are clearly playing your part on that BashM) they will continue to do so.

Pp1, When you say ‘we’re totally sick…’ does that mean we as in you tiger, the Valereum bod, the friends and family who are getting free share and making money at the expense of private investors losing most of what they have invested while this is shamelessly pumped and the promises morph from one thing to the next? Or a different ‘we’.

Pp1 says the summary from goldenrod is ‘ Totally false and outrageous. All of it ...’ yet anyone can check those facts for themselves very easily, and some are from the rns’s pp1 like to tell everyone are always true. That he claims they are false just highlights his many many lies.

See what I mean, pp1 and his fake posters must drown out the facts about Valereum.

Watch for more noise posts on here from all of them ........

Please remember pp1 and his post below never include any sources and that he is very likely a paid employee of Valereum.

Cimbom, great question! I wonder. Tiger/PP1 could you just set that up for me?

Also, I just got of the phone from my mortgage provider. I've told them what you said and they have agreed to stop asking me pay them interest on the money they lent, and have started paying us! Thanks you for educating me - I do feel just a little bit less stupid now. They won't pay me 1/4 of the value of our house in interest annually though, which seem uncompetitive based on your expertise.

So later today I'm going to pop down to the local market and see if the fruit and veg chap will pay me more and maybe throw in his stall and magic bean stalk too. Wish me luck!

Lets all take a break from Valereum and this deal for a bit, and think about something COMPLETELY different.

Imagine for a moment, you have a house and it has been valued at £500,000. Someone offers to buy half of it from you by investing £2,000,000 into your house. You don't actually get that money yet, but you will on 'maturity'. But until you get it, they will pay you 7.95% of the money THEY are investing, so that is about £159,000 a year for you. Remember your house (that they get half of ) is only worth £500k. So when all is done you get the keep £250k value of your house (which may even go up!), all those annual payments AND £2m.

If someone came to you with that offer, but you hadn't met them, they were doing this for the very first and last time (there were no records of them doing anything like this, or actually anything at all, before or since), would you go for it? Or might you think it seems just a tiny bit too good to be true and wonder what was really going on?

If you decided to ignore the strangeness, would you claim your house was now generation £159,000 a year in revenue? Even though you weren't doing anything differently such as started to rent it out on airbnb, and the £159k was actually coming from the investment so if it is real, it exists completely independently of your house?

And if it was someone you knew who had the house and they told you they had agreed to this, would you think they must have something quite clever (and possibly a bit dodgy) going on with the mystery investor?

Maybe you'd feel a lot more confident it was all fine if you knew the investor had successfully operated a hairdryer and taken a few people snorkelling in the past?

Translation of pp1 reply to your question Golden.

‘Yes it is true’

But obviously he can’t say that, so he accuses you of ‘noise’ instead. Pp1 doesn’t count his repetitive, ai created drivel as noise obviously.

FACT: Quorium were established in 2023 and report 2-10 employee's. Only one is on LinkedIn- Jimmy Kumlar who only reports one job (Quorium) although he only joined linked in Aug 2024… Source: LinkedIn, so anyone can check this for themselves.

OPINION (presented as fact by pp1): Quorium has been running for at least 10 years. Quorium and QGP are both owned by the same investors. Pieter Scholtz was apparently MD of Quorium before being MD of QGP (no comments from pp1 on the timeline relative to Piieters scuba-hair efforts). Also some claims about Steven Fathers being the ultimate controlling interest, but good luck verifying that.

The humour is both sophisticated and biting. Well done. Can you list 3 things GG has got wrong? You keep saying that, but without any examples.