Ryan Mee, CEO of Fulcrum Metals, reviews FY23 and progress on the Gold Tailings Hub in Canada. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
I can charge our car 35 miles and it costs 28p
From the telegraph Tesla
“New peak pricing at electric car chargepoints can leave consumers worse off than if they stuck to traditional petrol-engined vehicles, according to new analysis from the AA.
Previous analysis by motoring organisations has showed the cost of charging electric vehicles has soared (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/01/06/electric-vehicle-drivers-hit-surge-pricing-thousands-roadside/) in recent months, driven by rising energy prices partly triggered by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine last February.
Rapid charge points used by motorists topping u
p on long drives are now nearly £10 more expensive than filling up a car with petrol, the RAC revealed last week.”
Depends on the weather/temperature.
One comfortably does 5 miles per KW the other is half that.
But 8 months of the year the KW are free and off peak is 7.5p. Plenty of people still on a rip off peak tariff though.
But there have been free chargers and still are since I first got an EV in 2020.
Sorry Tesla if you were correct then 300miles would cost three pounds which is less than ten kilowatts.
GGP or SOLG hmmmm
What will give me more bang for my buck?
Dates for the diary …. If we last that long 2 events early March for Solg
https://redcloudfs.com/prepdac2023/
https://www.pdac.ca/convention/attendee-info/mobile-app-home
Was wondering if the website was still working
I believe a typical EV does about 4 miles per kilowatt hour. So for you 1p figure to be correct your home electricity would need to cost 4p per kilowatt hour! I doubt many people are paying anything like that.
Many other benefits to EV's though.
DBW
EVs cost 1p a mile if you charge at home .
Quite a few EVS could do your trip on 1 charge, if you have a Tesla then a top would take 5 mins and the infrastructure is very good.
If your house is set up environmentally friendly then it isn’t even 1p a mile if you take other factors into account.
Everything else to do with energy in this country is a joke, from the government strategy to implementation.
There is no joined up thinking………
Quite right DarkFrog
Add …. I had to drive to the NEC the other day (400 miles round trip ) …. Managed it on just half a tank of diesel…. Pulled into the services and the line of cars wiring at the charging points was crazy …. Unfortunately I can’t afford the loss of time not withstanding the diesel is probably cheaper .
Just a waiting game here now they just need to get this merger signed off ….. I do hope they’re not placing the CGP shares whilst we’re sitting at these lows.
Have a decent weekend
DBW
DF, sorry, my fault. I shouldn't have had a rant about the impracticalities of banning petrol vehicles and my disdain for politicians.
Quite right Shipright, but I will be dead by 2050, if not sooner, but I do worry for my daughter who should last to the end of the century! I accept that the world needs copper and lots of it, hence the reason why I am invested in Solgold. However this is a Solgold board not a global warming one.
Frog
Reuters LOL
DF. Just read any days convoy from the past 5 years. It's the same day in day out..
Climate change is relevant as it will drive the need for copper.
Quite right DartFrog.
Just one more.
Just found the David Bellamy quote of 2008 fact checked by Reuters.
Basically he was wrong.
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-climate-change-idUSL1N2RT1IT
Interesting that all these global warming theories are, please let this board get back to Solgold!
Frog
Sorry mad person.
The IPCC did not hide an email on the medieval warm period.
If I remember correctly this was a claim made by skeptical science.
These are a bunch of nutters that may be linked to the oil industry.
Don't know about David Bellamy.
But if he did deny global warming on a public broadcaster then they were right to sack him for spreading misinformation.
Why did the IPCC hide the email about having to discredit the Mediaeval Warm Period? Why did Dr David Bellamy lose his TV contract after calling MMGW bunkum? Why are prominent scientists sacked and cancelled? Surely, if they're wrong, just prove it with debate.
The IPCC even stopped adjusting for the heat island effect, when it didn't give the required results.
Anyway please read the information I have posted.
It's good to have an enquiring mind.
Don't read the rubbish that's out there .
Read what 97% of the world's scientific community are telling us.
Because they speak with one voice and their research stands up to scrutiny through the peer review process.
Madpunter you get idiots in every profession.
Science is no different.
The thing with science is it's not about personality but if your finding stands up to scrutiny.
That's why we have peer review.
None of the people you are on about stand up to having their theories put through the peer review process.
Good grief Madpunter.
I don't know how many times I have answered questions on the medieval warm period.
It was not hotter than today.
Some parts were hotter some were cooler, overall temperature was cooler.
How much rubbish do you believe or do you only read conspiracy theories to suit your world view.
For crying out load read peer review studies.
When prominent scientists get cancelled and sacked and debate is stifled, it rings alarm bells in true scientists, who question everything to get to the truth. The Liberal Left think that's a place in Cornwall.
Madpunter I didn't say it was constant I said it was around 200 parts per million.
You said it was 8 and 11 times more than today.
If you're right then that is between 3200 and 4400 parts per million.
We haven't seen that since the time of the dinosaurs when the earth was really hot.
I will supply the gigafacts entry to prove it
If you don't know what gigafacts are then no one can help you.
It's the scientific community getting together to debunk climate myths that the gullible believe.
https://gigafact.org/fact-briefs/is-it-possible-to-have-an-ice-age-even-with-high-levels-of-co2-in-the-atmosphere
How do you explain the Mediaeval Warm Period, when it was warmer than today? This was before we started burning fossil fuels. I'll give you a clue. It's the big orange ball in the sky.
Madpunter the Antarctic is much colder than the Arctic ~50 deg f in their respective summer averages so the south pole, thankfully has something of a buffer in regard to man made climate change unlike the Arctic which is surrounded by land that is warming up and losing its ice and snow cover which will accelerate the warming.