Member Info for Quady

Good morning Lending, the answer is no it doesn't work that way.

If the company buys back ten percent of their shares and keep up to ten percent in treasury, then the shares still exist although shares in treasury don't attract dividends.

If the company buys back ten percent of their shares and cancels them then the NAV per share increases, but because you expended the cash within the company to buy them, then you have lost the cash and cancelled the shares, which means the market capitalism doesn't change immediately, but in theory the share price will slowly rise, because you have less dividends to pay out, and either you can pay down debt, increase dividends or reinvest in the business.

That's correct aspers the company exports the register at close of business yesterday to identify holdings.

Anyone who bought this morning even if they were the first trade, does not get the dividend.

Shares went ex dividend this morning, you had to own them by close of play yesterday.

As a long term investor in NESF and ORIT.

I would like to see both companies use P2X2P as opposed to batteries for storage.

This not only solves the storage problem, but also stops the shutdown of the asset when overcapacity occurs.

I am now fully out, moving on.

Good luck everyone.

Slug stop talking out your bottom.

Show everyone the mathematics that shows climate change is wrong.

I suspect you don't believe in evolution or man landed on the moon.

Good grief Monte most of the anti climate science originates from Russia.

Why on earth do you give this time.

Every country on the planet is heading towards net zero apart from Russia and North Korea.

Even the USA is going to net zero despite Trump.

Slug this is why you are an unemployed i.t worker, and although I have been retired for seven years still get job offers till this day.

I don't know what happened to you.

But you are gullible in the extreme.

It's almost like you cannot assess evidence, because it would show you to be wrong.

Show me what part of the mathematics is wrong on climate change.

You can't.

Don't divert, answer the question.

What part of the mathematics is wrong on climate change.

A refusal to answer shows everyone on here what a fraud you are.

Slug try looking up professor Emily Shuckburgh.

Slug if you have a first class degree in mathematics show me the mathematics that proves climate change is wrong.

My oldest daughter has a first class honours in mathematics and a PhD.

She is a climate scientist.

I know who I would believe.

Try listening to Brian Cox on climate science.

You really are gullible.

Oh dear slug you have no idea of what capitalism is.

I doubt you have read anything by Adam Smith.

Capitalism has evolved and is embedded in modern day statecraft.

It's almost as I understand your inability to choose good investments.

You have no idea of change in the world.

You really don't understand science.

You don't get climate change, as you have never looked at it

You cannot possibly have a degree in mathematics, because if you did you could explain why you believe climate science is wrong on a mathematical basis.

You just spout conspiracy nonsense.

Slug everyone who knows me, knows I am a capitalist.

The reason that meritocracy doesn't work goes back over a thousand years.

You have to build an inclusive society to have a healthy society.

This is basic knowledge, you are advocating the views of a first year politics student, before they are exposed to learning.

So Slug you are against democracy, as you believe in meritocracy.

Any first year student in politics understands that meritocracy doesn't work as it excludes so many people and is a ultra right wing argument with no idea on how to create a society that is working together.

But guess what that doesn't surprise me.

Good morning addicknt, what do you think a hostile takeover would have produced.

It would have been a higher price as Jiangxi still would have bid.

If a bid of 20 pence had gone would BHP and other's have supported it.

I doubt it.

Personally I don't understand why they supported 28 pence.

Rodney no car manufacturers have abandoned EV's that's not true.

They are trying to extend the dependency on Ice because they have already put the forward investment in.

Good morning Covgaz.

It has already been proven, means time between failure figures show the recycles that can be achieved.

Because they will charge them discharge and keep going to work out the cycles.

Usually this underestimates the lifespan as it's worst possible scenario.

The point is the world is changing.

Technology is providing a reset and the likes of MathersFinger and slug cannot see the change in world.

So cannot understand investing.

As MathersFinger has proven by thinking of moving to day trading because of his experience with Solgold.

Ok MathersFinger you are now telling lies.

I made money day trading because as I have said before I know what I am doing.

However I gave it up, as I took stock of how much I was making and how much effort I put in.

It's much easier to identify long term prospects and make consistent returns.

In answer to addicknt I understand the diverse book, maybe you don't.

But as I said many times, the diverse book stopped a hostile bid.

What I didn't see was an agreed bid at such a low price.

I have always said the diverse book wouldn't protect against an agreed bid.

Oh dear MathersFinger you really are not very bright.

You are correct Solgold went to 46 pence a share and I should have sold.

I didn't but still have made over a quarter of a million pounds from Solgold and still retain 180,000 shares.

So many on here would be happy with my bad decisions.

However it's a small part of my portfolio, as any speculative share should be.

Only an idiot would suggest day trading because of Solgold, when they don't even understand long term trading.

You convict yourself by your own words.

This article shows that an EV battery that is charged twice a week can last 1,200 years.

Yep that's right and they are cheaper to produce and safer.

https://interestingengineering.com/energy/chinas-water-battery-outlast-lithium

MathersFinger as I suspected you really have no idea.

You are doing thing's back to front.

I used to day trade and use level 2.

You clearly don't have enough knowledge and will lose money.

You have shown that you don't understand how to read trades, you don't understand how the wider stock markets work and you don't understand SETS.

You should understand all these basics before buying your first stock.

You should be building a position built on generating income and then and only then could you day trade with some of the income generated.

I gave this up years ago, and I knew what I was doing.

You really have no chance.

If you want to make money, learn first of all how to pick long term winners that won't get you huge profits, but ones that grow year on year.

Shares like Solgold are speculative and it's people like you that don't understand this.

If you want to day trade start by learning the ins and puts of SETS.

At least then you can pretend to yourself that you know what you are doing.