Charles Jillings, CEO of Utilico, energized by strong economic momentum across Latin America. Watch the video here.
Addicknt, no I've not read the Daily Mail.
But I do know an EV that's done 120k miles and has only ever needed tyres and wiper blades replacing.
I guess the brake pads might need doing at some point, but I don't expect there will be any trouble from the timing belt, water pump, oil filter, catalytic converter, EGR valve, exhaust etc.
So its not all bad news.
If you can charge up at home most times, and you don't think electricity is going to double, I think they are worth a look.
I believe a typical EV does about 4 miles per kilowatt hour. So for you 1p figure to be correct your home electricity would need to cost 4p per kilowatt hour! I doubt many people are paying anything like that.
Many other benefits to EV's though.
Seem to be providing the Hydrogen for Rolls Royce project.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-63758937
From the Nvidia website:
'Join NVIDIA, Motional, Volvo Autonomous Solutions, Zenseact, and See Why the Future is Autonomous at NVIDIA GTC other industry leaders at the premier global AI event and learn how AI and autonomous vehicles are transforming the world. Running from November 8-11, GTC features expert-led sessions, training, and a news-packed keynote from NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang.'
Thanks for all the great research.
I have not thought about this before, but surely the "....opportunity for subscription revenue" mentioned is a huge incentive for a vehicle manufacturer to fit the best system available. If the customer was not happy they would not continue to subscribe.
Its seems obvious now I think about it. A completely new revenue stream for the manufacturers.
Clearly there is lots of news due and I assume Solgold could orchestrate its release to some degree to get the most benefit. So I don't understand why BHP never put someone on the board. Would they have been excluded from the key meetings anyway? or would they not have been able to use any information that was not public?
I don't know how these things work but perhaps its obvious to someone who does!
Or, have they been working closely together in the background ? I seem to remember reading that BHP offered some resources to help. As several posters have pointed out, BHP have been very quiet for a while.
GLA
And if so, what will trigger the ‘all’ option?
I believe that if they are not prevented from doing so, Solgold will be able get the funds and expertise to take Alpala to production, as seems to be the current plan.
Assuming that the major miners do not want Solgold becoming the new miner on the block and also that they have the capacity to stop that happening, when will some sort of move be made?
I’m beginning to think that the only way Solgold can be stopped is for one or a consortium of miners to buy everything. Surely, if they only buy one asset, then perhaps Solgold would have enough funds to explore and develop one of their other assets (perhaps a shallow one) and take it to production - exactly what a major may not want to happen. So buying Alpala and leaving Solgold with Porvenir may not be an option.
Therefore, a major can’t assume the ‘rinse and repeat’ idea will play out.
If this is the case, how long will the majors wait, what will be the tipping point?
Even if BHP come up with some sort of friendly deal to work with Solgold, the massive size of their portfolio makes me think someone, perhaps the Chinese, will not just sit back and let them get on with it. Its so big, going hostile may be inevitable.
GLA
Hi Copperpot.
Ingo mentioned this in his last presentation as well.
I think talks about a disused railway line running through the site down to San Lorenzo.
Also something about an easement and using a pipeline to transport stuff. I thought he said it was better environmentally, but I'm not sure I heard that right.
Cheers.
GLALTH more exiting news again today!