The latest Investing Matters Podcast with Jean Roche, Co-Manager of Schroder UK Mid Cap Investment Trust has just been released. Listen here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Fair enough
RK, thanks, but I don't use Twitter. This thread has been both amusing and revelatory.
Patience mon brave...
Slightly up on next to no volume today looks like the traders et al are starting their BH early not expecting much tmrw
55p someday soon!!!
That was a solgold tweet.
SolGold offers a meaningful value proposition relative to peers.
SolGold is undervalued relative to its copper developer peers on both a P/NAV and an EV/M&I resource basis.
Speaks to the calibre of Scott though. Bob embarrassed us with his 'fast and smart' nonsense, and Scott is now making claims I'll be astonished if he can pull off. Better to act in an impressive manner than over hype a lack of talent.
Isn’t this the most pointless thread ever? With 3 billion shares in issue, a dilution or not if 157 mil is totally irrelevant.
Addicknt...you have so much patience...top bloke.
we have a group on Twitter you should be a member of. DBH there also. Go onto the SOLG ADVFN Board and private message me.
If you're not interested thats fine but you won't get any rubbish, just 'the inside track'
yours rougepierre
That's the point jezzo. The notion of non-dilutive is almost impossible in reality, so a bold statement by Scott. Anyone who believes we will get cash without it reducing the cut that an individual holder has is living in a dream.
Perish the thought!
Had an interesting chat with one of the lifeguards at my pool which is all to frequently closed owing to a pool incident/mishap
Apparently if they can catch it in a net then they can spot treat the area with chemicals, if it’s too loose to be landed they must drain the entire pool and refill which takes some 72 hours
They probably do what with the incontinence that occurs jumping about in the water.
Nice water aerobics session with all the other old women?
Any of them understand dilution?
Just got back from the health club.
I was nothing to do with removing Slugs posts.
But then again he won't believe me, because it fits in with all his other conspiracy theories.
*or a piece of
I can see your point SH, but if they sell the shares they have cash to use, if they raise the cash any other way they still dilute us anyway. So it's 6 of one or half a dozen of the other really, whatever they do to raise cash they have to give something in return and while they aren't making a profit from anything it has to be something we own, either shares of a piece of the company.
Good to see slug using his big man mantra even when he's not reading my posts. Wouldn't want to waste a chance for a bit of toxic masculinity!
Add, you've just completely proven my point. Most here expect a sale. If the company sells the shares, you get less as a holder than you would if they didn't sell them. That, for my money, is dilution, and has been my point all along. If you want to call it something else because you're precious about the word dilution, be my guest. End scene.
After reading 'dilution refers to value...' I added him to the filter bin as well, along with SH.
He’s the sort of person with whom an argument online could never be won or ended but with whom and argument in a pub would be over instantly.
I blocked the fool, and I’m hoping we have some news to digest and discuss very shortly
Gawd blimey! Talk about pushing water uphill!
For the final time: We currently have 3.01bn shares in issue. If we sell the 155m, we will still have 3.01bn shares in issue.
If we reach exit point and the shares haven't been sold, they will be cancelled. Therefore we'll all own a marginally higher percentage of the company. Please note, it's not just SC who'll own a bit more, we all will. This is why he doesn't want to sell, as he's previously made clear.
I simply posted some well established facts and posed a question. And they removed it
He’s having a good cry to teacher! Possibly he’s trying to get the whole thread ditched as if people are going to forget
Boring day today on the book, same 19k lingerer both sides and depleting volume. Many expect the funding RNS soon
Yes, and when they are sold, instead of owning shares, we will own the proceeds. from the sale. The % of the company we own will remain the same as there are the same number of shares in issue.
I can't believe this is having to be spelt out.
If the company sells, as a large number of posters here believe will happen, will you get more or less money if those shares are owned by the company instead of being on circulation? Start simple, then I'll teach you from there.
There has been 3bn shares in issue throughout (before and after sc's statement). No one is debating that. But the company has owned, and therefore shareholders have owned, 155m of these since the merger.
And why won't he sell these shares, add? Because he wants to keep the number in circulation down, so he owns a bigger slice of the pie.
👍
Given that you refer to people who disagree with you as f**ktards, clowns, idiots etc, etc, I'm not sure you're in any position to lecture anyone about personal insults.
SM, agreed. Very odd choice. I suspect you recall this topic was debated ad nauseam a while back. We went round the houses and eventually reached the right conclusion - as SH likes to say, the science was settled. So it's strange it's arisen again, particularly as SC will do whatever possible not to sell the shares.