Member Info for SharketMare

RK, believe you posited the very same question last Friday and, funnily enough, no RNS arrived on Monday. It might be worth dialling the baseless ramping down a notch or two?

More AI generated slop. The internet is becoming worse.

Reading through this thread after a break from the forum. The posts RodneyT uses AI to construct are a world apart from his usual writing style, and this whole NAV argument is totally batsh*t.

Good to see redknight continuing to make himself look like a prize tool and picking fights he can't finish, throwing in a few cross ramps and trade brags for good measure.

"Neither group outlined above will sell their holdings for anything less than 150p."

Been on the pipe again have we Jacky boy? I bet Sangha would bite your hand off if we were offered 25p at this point.

Added another £2k worth at 9.4p.

It's being worked that's for sure. The low of the day at 9.10p was a sale of 5 shares, worth 46p.

There is clearly a seller here, offloading £5,000 and £10,000 blocks which is pushing the price down. Could be a longer term holder cashing out profit. There aren't enough buyers at the moment to hold the price. The fact that one of our directors put his hand in his pocket at 10.90p to me implies that sub 10p might present a good buying opportunity.

In all honesty I was surprised to still see redknight posting here after Buffett retired. Thought they were the same person.

Laughing at the idea that Needalife expects us to believe he is capable of sending an email. I recall suggesting he try that a year or so ago and he found the whole thing overwhelming.

Quady, you say it is only conspiracy theorists who claim the CIA think the lab leak is the most likely origin. Well here is the BBC article covering the CIA themselves saying just that:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cd9qjjj4zy5o

Hi Quady, how about you do some reading to broaden that narrow mind of yours? Here is a list of organisations and scientists who believe that the lab leak was the most likely source of the virus.

1. The CIA

2. The FBI

3. The US Dept of Energy

4. The US Defence Intelligence Agency

5. The BND (Germany's security services)

6. The US House of Representatives' congressional investigation

7. Dr. Robert Redfield – Former Director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

8. Dr. Alina Chan – Molecular biologist at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard

9. Dr. David Relman – Professor of microbiology and immunology at Stanford University.

10. Dr. Steven Quay – Physician and scientist who has extensively analysed the origins of COVID-19.

11. Dr. Richard Muller – Professor emeritus of physics at the University of California, Berkeley.

12. Professor Richard Ebright - Board of Governors Professor of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Rutgers University.

13. Nicholas Wade – Former science writer for The New York Times.

Do you really think you are better informed than the most powerful intelligence agency in the world, let alone a list of distinguished scientists? You're a useful idiot at best.

"Its all making total sense"

Yes, Jack. Every single poster bar you on this BB is a paid shill, posting in the hope you part with the shares you've amassed over the years. We've even gone to the lengths of creating LinkedIn profiles. It's all an illusion.

One of the most obvious ones from recent years is the 'conspiracy theory' that COVID was engineered at the Wuhan lab. At the time the rational among us pointed out that this was highly likely, and it was criticised by the scientific community as r*cist among other things. It is now accepted by most governments and security services that the lab was the most likely origin.

So Jack is working for BHP after all!

They are the Bloomberg journalists

Mining have just reprinted the BB piece. Pretty standard for trade publications to do this

Add yes, but the company pre-DV's coup didn't announce it was pursuing any of them. I think the reality is there is a small handful of businesses interested in developing Cascabel, but they are more than happy to sit on their hands and wait for us to balls it up rather than bidding and sparking a competitive process, and no one is willing to cough up enough cash for what could be an agreed bid. Part of the reason we are so undervalued is because no one serious believes we are going to be able to mine Cascabel ourselves. Hence Tandy - a smaller operation that could lead to short/mid-term cash flow and would, I imagine, have some of the infrastructure in place that we would need to mine the bigger prize.

Addicknt, I guess the drilling at Tandy and the plan to spin off the regionals into ExploreCo could be seen as a tangible shift in strategy for the whole company. But yes, for Cascabel it's more of the same.

Excellent news! Progress.

Populism, now there's a word that has no meaning whatsoever and is used by idiots to try and sound clever.