Member Info for SharketMare

Cannacord and SP Angel should be hammering the phones trying to find a block buyer for the 1.8bn shares held by Suay Chin.

Alone* not along.

TAM is irrelevant? The whole thing falls apart without TAM. Why do you think we are drilling it? For fun? The whole point of the exercise is to prove to whoever is going to buy us that there is a route to lower capex and FCF to fund the block cave operation at Alpala. We have to be able to convince the market of that otherwise we are once again a minnow on the hook for a massive infrastructure project that we 1) do not have the expertise to build along (our CEO and Chairman are not mine builders, they are dealmakers and 2) we have no hope in hell of raising the requisite funds without considerable dilution.

TAM is critical to delivering shareholder value from these levels.

The story will change quite quickly once the first shipment is dispatched. The price action today and particularly this PM smacks of long term holders at the ends of their tether and wanting out as close to 0.40p as possible.

There will be a churn of stock from the hands of those waiting for the permit into those who now realise they are holding onto an undervalued, fully permitted miner with considerable upside when the lithium price recovers. Expect to see our SP tethered much more closely to lithium from now on.

Addicknt, while there is no doubt that DGR is nothing without SOLG, I'm not sure the ALL RNS quite constitutes a death spiral. Fortunes will change very quickly there upon ratification, and the market has responded well to today's news.

In all honesty and despite being vociferously against them previously, digital ID cards are the only way we're going to get on top of the numbers of people coming in to this country illegally and either living off the British state or working in the black economy. Or both.

"We expect the customs and DNGM people on site to finalise that approval".

This was stated verbatim just after he said the team had met with the Minister of Mining last week. It sounds like we've been given the approval verbally and just need the site visit to sign the paperwork.

Affrm, it appears my original post asking you to give it a rest has been deleted, as has your reply.

In 2010, SOLG had 193m shares in issue valued around 5p a share, giving it a MCAP of under £5m. A junior exploration company doing 100% in a day from that level is not unheard of. To suggest that today - valued at just shy of half billion pounds - we could do similar, is ridiculous and shameless ramping. Please tone it down and try and stick to fact-based, reasoned discussion. Not "this will be 20p by the end of the week IMHO".

Batsh*t crazy nonsense as per usual.

Yes, a sensible strategy, whereas in this country we have shot ourselves in both feet by not doing the former (continuing to provide cheap energy using fossil fuels) and going gung-ho on the latter without the necessary infrastructure.

Whether on here or on Telegram, increasingly investors are using LLMs (mostly ChatGPT) to analyse shares and their future potential.

I am happy to be proven wrong, but I don't believe these tools can access things such as broker notes, unless they have been published for free on the internet.

This means the outputs from LLMs are based upon analysis of: 1) Company RNS 2) Media coverage 3) Company reports 4) Social media commentary 5) Blogs and forums such as LSE.

A quick play around with ChatGPT 5 (a version I pay for) asking about the likelihood of SOLG being taken over - a topic the company does not typically comment on and which media has speculated about for years - relied heavily on commentary on this forum for its answers and analysis, including price targets.

I hope you can see where I am going with this. There is a lot of speculative, uninformed commentary on LSE BBs. Some posters are credible and sensible, others less so. LLMs will not know this.

So we are likely to end up in an odd place, where posters are sharing AI generated content on a share's prospects, which may well be based upon their own ramblings on the very same bulletin board.

Just something to bear in mind as more and more of this junk is shared.

Affrm, I'm hoping my other half turns into Sydney Sweeney overnight. Chances of that happening are about as slim as you knowing what is going on here.

really amusing see stackhigher look like the total **** he is on an almost weekly basis.

No, it doesn't.

It does look like this is not being let above 0.38p at the moment - a close above 0.37p would be very positive. The SP looks tightly coiled at the moment - bring on the export license.

A cannabis user! Heaven forfend!

Good to see movement upwards from our previous range. If we can push and hold through 0.37 the rerate upon receiving the export license should hopefully reward us handsomely from these levels.

If ActusRay are working with anyone (which I doubt) is it not more likely to be with Newmont? They also took a short position out on GGP around the same time that Newmont decided that Havieron was not part of their long term plans, which led to the Telfer/Havieron divestment.

In my view the biggest risk here is if Tandy doesn't turn out to be economical as an open pit to free up cash flow to develop Alpala. Per DV's interview yesterday, the early drilling results are good, but three holes do not a feasible mine make. It'll be two steps back if the numbers don't add up there.

I don't recall anyone asking what shares you hold in your portfolio or expressing remote interest, yet you still feel the need to periodically update readers of the SOLG board. Why is that?

The disappointment with Scott was that he positioned himself as a methodical, delivery type - he was never a natural CEO. But that was what the company needed at the time, someone to get on with the job of developing the asset and proving to the market we could meet deadlines and deliver. Instead he nearly let the coffers run dry and by all accounts was focused solely on trying to force a sale (while ensuring he would receive a handsome payday for doing so).