Member Info for SharketMare

I have found the slide and have a different translation. No mention of explosives.

Suspension of mining operations: Quarry operations have been suspended since June 1, 2025, due to the absence of a decree granting an exploitation license. This situation has led to the technical layoff of part of the workforce (300 employees), while construction work continues. Support from the Ministry is needed to enable a rapid resumption of mining activities.

Authorization to export spodumene ore: The available stock now exceeds 42,000 tonnes of ore. A request for export authorization has been submitted for the available quantities. This authorization would help free up space on site, improve the cash flow of the plant and suppliers, and mark an important milestone in the commercial launch of the project.

Official production launch ceremony: The site's official production launch, marked by the inauguration of the mine, could be carried out by His Excellency Army General Assimi Goïta before the end of August 2025. To ensure the success of this ceremony, it is necessary to finalize logistical preparations, implement a communication plan, and mobilize regional authorities and relevant services (Ministry of Mines, Bougouni Governorate, etc.).

Can someone provide a link to the pic of the alleged slide, please? Would like to see it with my own eyes. The FB page is not working for me (I do not have an account). Thanks.

I have taken a position here based upon the director buying at just over 0.3p. I don't think they'd be ploughing cash into a business they didn't have faith in obtaining an export license.

It's very clear which posts - or parts of posts - Stackhigher is copying and pasting directly from whichever LLM he is using to argue with someone on the internet. A proper sad act.

RK, believe you posited the very same question last Friday and, funnily enough, no RNS arrived on Monday. It might be worth dialling the baseless ramping down a notch or two?

More AI generated slop. The internet is becoming worse.

Reading through this thread after a break from the forum. The posts RodneyT uses AI to construct are a world apart from his usual writing style, and this whole NAV argument is totally batsh*t.

Good to see redknight continuing to make himself look like a prize tool and picking fights he can't finish, throwing in a few cross ramps and trade brags for good measure.

"Neither group outlined above will sell their holdings for anything less than 150p."

Been on the pipe again have we Jacky boy? I bet Sangha would bite your hand off if we were offered 25p at this point.

Added another £2k worth at 9.4p.

It's being worked that's for sure. The low of the day at 9.10p was a sale of 5 shares, worth 46p.

There is clearly a seller here, offloading £5,000 and £10,000 blocks which is pushing the price down. Could be a longer term holder cashing out profit. There aren't enough buyers at the moment to hold the price. The fact that one of our directors put his hand in his pocket at 10.90p to me implies that sub 10p might present a good buying opportunity.

In all honesty I was surprised to still see redknight posting here after Buffett retired. Thought they were the same person.

Laughing at the idea that Needalife expects us to believe he is capable of sending an email. I recall suggesting he try that a year or so ago and he found the whole thing overwhelming.

Quady, you say it is only conspiracy theorists who claim the CIA think the lab leak is the most likely origin. Well here is the BBC article covering the CIA themselves saying just that:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cd9qjjj4zy5o

Hi Quady, how about you do some reading to broaden that narrow mind of yours? Here is a list of organisations and scientists who believe that the lab leak was the most likely source of the virus.

1. The CIA

2. The FBI

3. The US Dept of Energy

4. The US Defence Intelligence Agency

5. The BND (Germany's security services)

6. The US House of Representatives' congressional investigation

7. Dr. Robert Redfield – Former Director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

8. Dr. Alina Chan – Molecular biologist at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard

9. Dr. David Relman – Professor of microbiology and immunology at Stanford University.

10. Dr. Steven Quay – Physician and scientist who has extensively analysed the origins of COVID-19.

11. Dr. Richard Muller – Professor emeritus of physics at the University of California, Berkeley.

12. Professor Richard Ebright - Board of Governors Professor of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Rutgers University.

13. Nicholas Wade – Former science writer for The New York Times.

Do you really think you are better informed than the most powerful intelligence agency in the world, let alone a list of distinguished scientists? You're a useful idiot at best.

"Its all making total sense"

Yes, Jack. Every single poster bar you on this BB is a paid shill, posting in the hope you part with the shares you've amassed over the years. We've even gone to the lengths of creating LinkedIn profiles. It's all an illusion.

One of the most obvious ones from recent years is the 'conspiracy theory' that COVID was engineered at the Wuhan lab. At the time the rational among us pointed out that this was highly likely, and it was criticised by the scientific community as r*cist among other things. It is now accepted by most governments and security services that the lab was the most likely origin.

So Jack is working for BHP after all!

They are the Bloomberg journalists

Mining have just reprinted the BB piece. Pretty standard for trade publications to do this