Proposed Directors of Tirupati Graphite explain why they have requisitioned an GM. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Being US investors could they be acting on behalf of a potential buyer of the company? Not saying this is likely but ispossible.
Certainly they are not passive investors from what I can see. They like to partner closely with their investee companies and advise/guide where necessary.
I can see nothing but positives in this stake.
I was thinking similar, perhaps someone wants to take it private?
Definitely think Venrock are buying on behalf of a big pharma. If a potential suitor now owns 6% of the company it gives them an edge in negotiations.
I suspect Venrock will continue to accumulate what they can.
Isn't there a % threshold where they are obliged to make an offer? 30% I have in my head but that could be for something else entirely different.
Yes, I think that is correct.
GHIA...I cannot see owning 6% would give a Pharma the edge in negotiations??
Surely we are going for the best deal on the table....!
Ghia,
Have to agree with you ....and a US pharma is more than likely as already mentioned....
Pressure pressure
They will be asking for a place on the board shortly :-)
If a major Pharma is accumulating here..that would most likely indicate
a buyout was their intention????
Surely a better deal is in the best interests of Venrock even if they have a holding in the buyer/licencee?
If there is a bid going to come the bidder is mopping up whatever shares they can get at a minority listed price which is the current share price. Hence cheaper to get a minority stake. So when they go for a full takeover the price rises on all residual shares at a full control price and includes a bid premium. So enough said...looking fantastic IMHO.
I think the bid premium here is large and say a guess is 75 to 100% uplift at least.
Hostile takeovers are rare in the biotech world ....
That said , building a stake before news makes sense and does put a bit of pressure on the BOD , but we getting ahead of ourselves for the moment ....
I disagree it puts pressure on the board at these levels....it would need to be in he 20's
for that..and I do not think it is possible to build a position of that size here in the
near future ....IMHO!
"If a potential suitor now owns 6% of the company it gives them an edge in negotiations."
Don't agree, but wanted others to be aware of section 303 of the Companies Act 2006:
If a shareholder holds > 5% of the companies shares, they have the right to require the Directors of the Company to convene a general meeting to propose various changes to the Board, as stipulated here:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/section/303
I'm not saying anyone has plans for board representation, but all holders over 5% could call a meeting to do so by right.
So unless we see an rns for an EGM, there's nothing to worry about.
That's how I read it yes.
I've seen it exercised once at ANGS (RNS - 10.01.2019)
Not sure how this works but if Vernock were to want to take us private , what price would they put on our business? The current market capitalisation value? Surely not? I am no expert in these matters.
Personally I believe a take over to be the most likely outcome and one that I would be very happy with - I realise that with a license agreement we may achieve more but that would require you to remain a shareholder for years to come - not a terrible proposition but I would prefer a good price now and to free up the funds for other opportunities. I also believe the SNG board are very up for a deal from big Pharma and at the right price I would not expect the takeover to be hostile but come with BoD support. For the moment hold hard.
Steady - if they continue to buy on open market, there will be a point where sp goes batsh.t crazy.
So far sp has been static because old IIs are selling off, while the yanks are hoovering up.
The more they own, the mote upwards pressure there will be on sp.
They can always just make an offer to buy the entire thing though and we won't be going for anything near the current mcap.
Steady, that would very much depend on the ambtions of Lansdowne, Polar and Leonard Licht. Very little to do with us or senior company management.
The question is at what stage do Venrock announce their investment to the world? Clearly they believe that SNG001 is going to succeed, as they wouldn't be putting in this kind of capital otherwise. They will have an investment thesis based on research that we simply don't have access to, and this is driving them to buy millions of pounds worth of shares. I suspect they'll want at least 10%, but as others have pointed out, I can't see this happening without them causing a sharp increase in the share price as selling dries up... A fascinating period lies ahead.
Exciting times ahead guys. Thanks for all the info. A lot of knowledge on this BB
BB...it makes sense to me to go for a Buyout ..But I guess the big question is
are we seeking approval ourselves? We discussed this last weekend I said
we could put our own team together to do this, but many posters thought..no way..
and we would use a Partner with experience to do this ..But as many weeks have passed
and we have not announced any deal with a Partner surely that would support the theory
we are going alone.....If we get approval our value rockets....Then I think a buyout is a
realistic outcome...Because if we do a deal with X now that surely puts them in an
advantageous position..and chances of a future bidding war for a takeover are gone???