Member Info for wyndrum

Its a bit choppy after 261p as to exactly what's next but as long as it holds then 261p should be decent support.

Thanks for sharing GK, obviously you didn't have to, so thanks again.
251p buy in, 180p exit = potential 71p loss.
251p buy in, 502p exit = potential 251p gain. 3.5 risk reward, seems ok. good luck.

shares to double, ok, when, 20 years? what if it goes down. still in 195p?

GK, how long do you expect to be a holder? what is your target price for the stock to rise to? what price will you sell at if the SP goes down?

ok gazza this is bit weird now? How old are you?
No one on this board (and even at Avacta) knows where the SP will go either in the next 5 minutes or 5 years. You must know that.
By all means sell and it falls buy in again at a lower price, we would all do that if we knew that was going to happen.
And I think fwiw the Sp might trickle down a bit on no news as it has done this week but if any news is released then you will miss out. Again fwiw I think the immediate re-rating would be 100p plus with further improvements in the SP as it starts to sink in what it is worth to avct, but what do I know.
So either do something or don't, but I have no idea why you are posting and asking questions you know no one here can answer?

Well then let me help retro, none of these posts of whatever hue, move the SP, not a jot. Rest easy.

The point is Gazza, and I am assuming you are genuine, what do you want? Nobody hear can give you an assurance over if or when any product will be released/launched. The only people who could do that are the bods at Avacta. so contact them and see what they say. (I have no idea if they will take your call or what info they would or could pass on)
It sounds to me that you are over committed and as a result over-anxious on potentially losing too much money on your AVCT holding. So, if you get no joy from Avacta directly and the anxiety is too much, then sell down to a level you feel comfortable with.
(For instance in you had bought £100 of AVCT at the top, say 200p then at todays price you would be down about £12.50. I don't think that amount of paper loss would worry you. Although extreme perhaps, it is nevertheless a good example of where the individual's anxiety levels reside when they start to over commit to a stock)

retro, do you know musclehead is a paid de-ramper or do you just disagree with his post? (genuine question)

ah...sorry, the penny has just dropped (I was bit slow on the uptake) Patanji, hates Boo and their potential involvement in illegal practises.
Fair enough, that's one way of getting your message across

chartwise it needs to stay above 251p otherwise further falls more likely. currently in 251-261 trading range

Peace, have you ever got a prediction right yet?

well patanj, each to his own but your remarks do nothing to help the image of boo on this board and only elevate the allegations against boo as being well founded, which is pretty dumb if you want the SP to go up.

Patanj, Its actually very easy to make money if you break the law. There is nothing clever about that.
It does not take any skill to make more money than a competitor if you ignore the legal framework.
But why stop there, why don't you just set up your own people trafficking business and cut out the middleman and keep all the profits to yourself,.
But don't complain if you get caught and end up in jail

I tell you what Patanji, if you are so enthusiastic for sweatshops and slave labour , why you don't work in one before you perhaps gloat in the terrible conditions you wish to ensure carry on?

KK, it doesn't mean no vat fraud has been done, just that no vat fraud has been discovered or evidence of, its not quite the same thing, (I'm just saying.)

let me say at the outset I have no idea where this is going, up or down, what is going on behind the scenes, if anything.
2 things that strike me is that 1, the amounts of Director buying are actually quite small and does not have the same oomph the last big purchase did and 2, it does not change the background story.
If there is some sort of boo complicity in the allegations then just because some directors make fairly modest share purchases does not alter that.
To recap, great results, but an indifferent SP reaction, followed by regurgitating stories, with a drip, drip of new, old news constantly depressing the SP, culminating in some public shorts, causing more rapid sp decline.
Directors respond by buying shares to shore up the SP.
Its a concern that this is the 2nd time the family particularly, as they are the ones buying big, have had to step in by buying their own stock to stop the SP falling, and its on the same story. In other words almost all of the first purchase (at about 210p was it?), that allowed the SP to recover previously has been "wasted" in the sense it was down to 220p at 1 point yesterday.
The recovery from there is presumably on the knowledge this Director Share purchase was leaked prior to the official announcement yesterday afternoon.
So are we any the wiser on the allegations? No we are not. I guess if you did not trust that the issue has been fully aired then I don't think this will make new investors pile in.
It will be interesting day but it feels to me this has still to run a bit yet. I presume a more defining point might be, if and when we are told the shorts have closed their position?

Sorry adam I can't convince you. Yes there is demand to buy the share but it is the seller who forces the SP up.

Adam, your logic is correct but your conclusion is not. yes in your example there is demand to buy the stock but the price of the purchase is determined by the seller. And of course you never run out of stock. The stock remains the same, and that 1000 share purchaser at 250p will at some stage be a seller. lets say you are right and all the sellers have sold... (except they haven't, the stock is now transferred to so what was a buyer), so now somebody , me, wants to buy at 252p but there are no sellers left who want to sell at that price, but our 1000 shareholder at 250p will sell at 255p to me, so who has forced the SP up, me or the seller? I didn't want to pay that much but wanted to get on board because I think 300p is coming soon, so I don't mind paying a bit more (coz I'm greedy and at the same time fearful I will miss out) .
Every buyer sooner or later becomes a seller. the amount of stock available remains the same.3
So the irony is all these lower SP's are because of buyers forcing the sellers to sell lower because the sellers were fearful it would go lower still.....(Bloody buyers... you are your own worst enemies!)

Comic: Wyndrum - sorry that was not clear. If you don't have a buyer then the price drops because the seller can not sell.

Well, yes that's true but it cuts both ways, if neither blinks then no trade takes place. You are assuming the seller MUST sell or in the other position, the Buyer MUST buy.

comic, Its only people that buy and sell shares (don't go into the algo's thing as a, it gets too complicated and b, you would have a point)
And people are pack animals with herd instincts and react to emotional stimuli of which fear and greed are two of the strongest and therefore most easily manipulated. If you believe people are predictable then charts are a great help as all a chart is, is the graphical representation of peoples buys and sells, which are emotionally driven, nothing to do with fundametals. (well a bit, but not as much as you would think)
And people are not rational, that is just a pretence, a delusion we all suffer from to some extent or another.
In this game the less emotional you are the easier it is to make better calls and that's only because the majority are easily manipulated. if they were not, trading by and large would stop. we would all be in trackers I guess. And where is the fun in that?