Member Info for wyndrum

This has been an interesting ride although not profitable thus far, and I imagine the same for many. Even if you were in a while ago and have actually done ok, its a bit flukey because had covid not arrived then presumably the SP would be nothing to shout about.
I mention this because, the frankly hysterical reaction from a fair few here to every rumour and sometimes tenuously related testing topic would suggest that this is the "stock of a lifetime"
I know many here are in other stocks but over the last 6 months there have been substantial rises from so many other companies I do wonder quite why there is so much devotion and emotion to this one.
Over he last 6 months, G4M 3 bagger, EVE 3 Bagger, WOSG 2 bagger, nearly 3. Just fairly ordinary low tech retail stocks, no drama, no BB's riven with derampers and foul language and spiteful crude comments.
The world of small pharma has been quite the eyeopener (for me), but clearly there are easier and quicker ways to make money than these stocks. NCYT is the exception but who knew? How many stocks do you have to hold for the one jewel to shine?
It would appear you need a lot of luck in your stock picking, because for all the analysis here (the good stuff), it has not "worked" yet. Realistically what are we looking at? a 5 bagger in 2 years? or 10 or 20 or 1, or less? The longer you project the timeframe the more chance some other company will pip you at the post and your research gets made redundant.
In hindsight it looks to me AS knew exactly what he was doing at 181p when he sold. He did not think the SP would likely get back to that price for some time.
So the lessons here seem fairly obvious , buy companies that you understand. Look for obvious signs of problems, (Director sells, delays in product launch, etc), don't over commit,
Some will have done all of this from the outset but I would wager more still, haven't.

PC promised never to post again if he received 20 tics and got 38 so maybe, he will stick to his word

Scardey, do you think our competitors have not already worked it out that our is test is (apparently) the best?

Massive spread showing on HL 4.3p to sell 4.8p to buy More than 10% ...weird.
Sounds like the MM's don't want to trade this either way right now.... Is something a foot?

not quite.....

5 ticks away from sanity...…..

Does anyone know how old Pound Cake is? ( I am struggling to get a "picture" of him/her based on the posts)

pesky figure this 115p. Again it might be telling what happens in the last 10-20 mins of trading today.
The afternoon rise has been welcome but muted so I don't think at this stage the market shares this boards enthusiasm. But as ever, time will reveal all.

If the tender is public then would I be correct in thinking it would not be subject to NDA's on those who are or wish to, tendering?

You may well be correct Infinity, in which case he should not have taken the company public.....

Well, fingers crossed then.
(This board is well overdue some actual good news so perhaps tomorrow will be the day)

Sleepy, i'm devils advocate this but what makes you think we can do 2 validations and a manufacturing validation in 3 weeks?
Whats that based on? How long has BAMS taken? what yardstick can we use to say 3 weeks is doable?
And do we have a test? Its a bit like me having a load bricks and building materials, it does not mean I have a house ...yet

Max, the "Smart" money tend to use charts :0)

fair enough ES but I would not classify moaning with highlighting continual missed deadlines of the company.
As for doubting the company did either...well I think its obvious that AS knew quite a bit when he sold his shares, or do you think that was purely co-incidental? (not a trick question just interested in your view).

ES, its not me talking down my investment its AS.
The general expectation here was that BAMS was going to be validated in November, already being several weeks "late". Many posts from the beginning of this month stated Bams would be first and its "any day now".
Now after an update it's sometime in December.
Was anyone here aware of the saliva problem until AS highlighted it? Was anyone here aware AVCT had gone over to nasal swabs until AS highlighted it?
Was anyone here aware that "The performance of the test with clinical samples will now be evaluated as a precursor to a much larger clinical study with COVID-19 patients of known viral load to determine the clinical sensitivity of the test. In parallel BBI Solutions is working to finalise and validate the manufacturing process so that the Group can carry out a full clinical validation on the final product to support the regulatory approval process. "
In other words there is still much validation to be done and in fact has not even started yet. Did you know that prior to the RNS?
I accept this is difficult tech and people are working very hard to overcome all sorts of problems and obstacles as they occur. But the SP reflects the delays and a higher level of uncertainty regarding timelines than previously was acknowledged before yesterdays RNS.
I think it is also worth mentioning that after AS disastrous and presumably unintentional misleading of investors over timelines in the summer, the expectation here was that he would not make that mistake again ref the sept update.
So its not unreasonable for investors to be wary and indeed much more cautious now on what AVCT pronounce for the future. The goodwill towards AVCT has been largely used up for many now, and it will be actions rather than words that will
determine future SP moves.
The "good news" is that the SP has settled to a floor of around or just above 100p and if there are no further delays looks to be a good entry point. (And by delays I think if no test available to be purchased by end of January and or for other significant news as opposed to a holding RNS of yesterday)

mid price is 4.4p which all being well will stick. 5p is the next target which again right now does not seem much of an ask, then it brings the 6.4p recent double top into play. Onwards and upwards! (If only wishing made it so...)

See Cest, our relationship is on the mend already, I am good for something after all!

I think the SP pull back is just a knee-jerk on market expectation of retail shops opening and therefore taking some trade away from online companies (such as Boo and Asos).
Personally I think that ship has sailed and Boo will yet again unsurprisingly surprise the market. Good entry level imo

because pedro, you are likely to get a more balanced view from someone who has not (yet) committed to a purchase. Once you have skin in the game you tend to look for as much confirmation as you can and delete anything that might contradict your decision.
Peoples views either have merit or they don't. It is meaningless to attribute less weight to their views based on whether or not they hold the stock. In fact peoples views should be taken more sceptically if they do hold the stock (which is why in various publications the author has to declare if they have shares in the company , simply to make readers aware it could be biased!)

ES23: some of your comments have been echoed by many and I don't really understand the thing about "derampers"
The term really applies almost universally to anybody who expresses doubt or a negative viewpoint. For all the positive comments over the last 48 hours and there have been many, are all based on a projection for the future as you too have concluded when you say "...giving more options and potential revenue streams", which is fine but as we have seen progress has been slow and now slower still as more larger studies are to be undertaken after smaller studies are completed before progress can be signed off. So me expressing not just doubt but actual fact from the RNS will lead to maybe, some personal abuse, (maybe not) but just as likely being asked not to post such "negative" views, because we are where we are and it does no good.
Its is summed in your comment "Best thing I reckon we could do now is to get behind the company, or else sell up and move on if unable to do that."
"Get behind the company"? What does that mean? just post positive comments here (whether substantiated or not), and maybe, worse case, lure people into buying based on what is said here without giving a more rounded picture? by your logic only positive posts allowed apparently?
Finally you seem to contradict your self when you say you held off buying by the "Deramp crew" which resulted in the SP rising by 30% in the meantime but surely that share price move contradicts the effect "derampers" have?
The level of almost paranoria on this board (and others) on negative comments that are believed to influence the SP is really weird.
BB's don't influence the SP and if you think I am wrong then look at it the other way: The ramping that goes on here (specifically) would be translated into a 500p plus share. But it doesn't, does it?