Member Info for wyndrum

SGF, I can't see any significance historically in and arounfd 17p, I think maybe 18p if you were anxious to de-risk some or if you wanted to play it a bit more hard ball wait for 21.5p to offload some?

SGF, I don't know if its of any interest but ANG is looking like a buy right now chart-wise. You could play it with a tight stop or be pretty loose down to 95p or wait for extra confirmation and buy if it closed above 111p but I like it where it is now. (104p to sell, 106p to buy) just my opinion obviously, DYOR

(I am the holder of the stock so I have an interest in case anyone wanted to know)

Thanks for sharing (however late to the party you are....)

Marik, a range is the gap between 2 points. yesterday i said:

"Since the dramatic fall there has been a narrow trading range of 11.3p - 12.5p. So it will depend where it closes to day to make any future guestimates on what is most likely to happen next. Assuming it closes above 12.5p then there will start to be signals that a reversal is underway. On this daily chart it looks to be 18.16p followed by our old friend 21,5p as the 2 next targets if the reversal is proven."

It closed above 12.5p yesterday so that put in play the 2 upward targets, therefore, we are in a range between the bottom (11.3p) and (going just by the day chart close) 21.5p, but I did say i could see 18.16p as probably the first target where I would not be surprised to see a stall.

Does that help at all? At no stage did I say, not buy, at no stage did I indicate a fall was coming? Why do you persist in the futile attempt to try and reverse everything I say?

You don't see any point in using TA to time entry and exit. Fine... but don't keep making up stuff please.

Marik... do you know what a "range" is?

The rumour is that Medusa, who have exclusive rights to sell Avacta's test but only for home use, have had approval to do so and are manufacturing it now for late September deliveries. (They had been trialling it for home use approval back in May so time wise its probably accurate. The source of the rumour (and that's all it is currently) is a from a well-respected poster to many. Avacta will be giving interim results late September. As a result there are "ducks" and "rows" and a lot of excitement over there which is fair enough because its been hard yards there too.

Doug, do you know how companies are valued?

ITV, I understand your post and would not want to sound either patronising or certain in my "knowledge of things".

The fear & greed thing is used often because they are two of the most powerful emotions the body possesses and they if are sufficiently provoked, almost always win out in a "rational" internal discussion with the brain.

If you are in place whereby the amount you could lose on this investment does not trouble you then my remarks simply don't apply to you.

(But if the amount invested does have the potential to concern you, then even if its for the most altruistic reasons, then those emotions can and often do, cloud rational judgement.

Sorry for any offense given.

ASW, my advice would be on this perennial, never -ending question is to NEVER, EVER look at buys & sells. it is pointless, utterly pointless, and of no help whatsoever.

There is nothing you can infer from it. Not all buys & sells are publicised at the time, and its not always accurate how they are recorded and finally just work on the very basic premise of "For every Buy there must be a Sell, and for every Sell, there must be a Buy"

On that basis it is a meaningless indicator that is of no singular help to anyone. (Phew... that's better)

PR, knock yourself out posting yet more off topic stuff but I am having a very good today and the day's only half done, and yesterday was pretty good too!)

That's alright Jo, but you always get overshoots to big news.

As Eastwood points out in a very timely manner and as the old adage goes, "never bet more than you can afford to lose", but people do when buying stocks because they "comfort" themselves that even if it does go down, it won't last long, and all will be well, therefore they over commit because they are greedy in their expectation of profit. But when a dramatic (in this instance) fall happens , and they see quite how big there loss is in red ink, on the screen, in front of them, they panic and sell.

Fear & greed. Get it under control and it makes this an easier game than it sometimes is. (just my 2 cents)

Jo, not all traders sell you know! Lots of us bought in as soon as they felt the fall was over.

Its funny (to me) but there always seems to be an underlying current of animosity by some on BB's towards traders, as though it is only they that force the SP down and that for some reason they never want the SP to rise?

For instance, what do you think caused the fall in the SP last week?

BP, on HL Chart I have yesterdays close at 14.60p showing only 35.44 on the RSI So yes, plenty of space to go up before any meaningful pull back.
However when you look at the intra day (weekly) RSI chart its been bubbling around the very high 70's all today hence the little pull backs we have seen, so as to make room for further appreciation.

(However that is only relevant if you are looking to trade today (whether to add or sell, whatever the individual's motivation might be).

Yes ES, PR is doing exactly that.... as usual,... he does it all the time and then Apre joins in. All it takes is for all the posters that think this is a waste of time, to stop posting crap about me. Its not that hard

(Apre, You couldn't decipher a tone ina post if your life depended on it)

But tell me this seeing as oyu accuse me of being Maniipulative:

Have I ever, ever, in my posts "manipulated" you? Have you ever changed the course of your investment based on anything I ever said?

I am guessing the answer is no:

If I am correct in that assumption, then why should anybody else have been "manipulated" or see any of my posts as manipulative? Any proof of that at all, anywhere, from anyone. ever? No?

So perhaps you are saying you don't "fall" for my posts because presumably you are so clever and all knowing, and feel you have to protect the vulnerable on here?
And you think I am egotistical!

ES, then tell the numbskulls here to stop posting stupid inaccurate rubbish about me.

I said earlier, its not me that takes threads away off the subject, its your precious "Guardians of the Board" that insist on having a pop at me even when i am patently right! Just as you are doing as well.

Apre, get in line and take a ticket...

Busted flush,? how can that be when I am making money?

Private Ryan that is pathetic!! and you know it. Ha ha!! it was a perfectly reasonable response to the posters question

Look at the very first part of my post which you so gleefully re-post "without some meaningful income generating news its unlikely the SP will go up".

Don't you think if Medusa do say HUA has been granted that would count as Meaningful income generation?

So just to be clear 3 days ago based on TA I added to my holding and its now currently 15% up.

Just suck it up and realise that the garbage you spew out about me is only landing on your shirt.

PR, the opposite of being wrong is being right:

My post on the 17th Aug: Youknow, 3 days ago:

"Ray: "Top up time? Clearly not yet"
I disagree, I think if anyone is in a position to release funds then this iooks a very good position to add. (The caveat as always is, never bet more than you can afford to lose.)
(I am sure you will all be delighted to know I managed to get some at 102p just before 8:30p)"

Cheers!

I try and keep it pretty black & white, and not let what I want to get in the way of what I actually see.

So far every support has eventually been broken as the stock has been in decline over the last 6 months.

However there is (if I go back far enough) support at 2.90p.) the reason i mention this is that there is the beginning of a pattern which suggests the SP might be reversing. It will be confirmed with a close up today and confirmed further with a close above 3.15p.
This has happened before and proved to be temporary respite however, this pattern is the one I have found to be the most reliable so although it could fail again, from my experience repeated failures becomes less likely.

(Due tot he spread I have added today and gambled that the pattern will form and confirm but with a much more proactive view now. I understand this is of little interest to others, and certainly not top be copied but I only post it really as confirmation we are all in this together, and it would be very nice if the patience of the majority here have shown, pays off.