Member Info for tomvisual

ALLAN142, if its NCYT, Sandman1982 post this morning (24/4/20 6:57) was spot on.
Excellent research again Sandman1982.
The post and time is etched in my brain!
Test, test, test

If we need to follow Petos science, then NCYT definitely need to up manufacturing big style now!
I shudder to think of the vulnerable group individuals having to contemplate social distancing/isolation a further 18-24+ for a vaccine.....

Follow the Science.
Test, test, test.

Independent reporting that Coronavirus vaccine trial could be delayed by fall in UK infection rate.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-vaccine-uk-cure-oxford-university-trial-treatment-a9481626.html
This is bad news for vaccine development. This was why there was an urgent drive to start trials.
With fall in infection rate then scientists may have to wait for the second wave, Oct/Nov.
covid 19 is going to go on and on.
As Professor Peto stated in his letter to BMJ,
https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/368/bmj.m1163.full.pdf
without a vaccine, mass testing is the way forward.
Looks to me like if we 'follow the science', covid 19 has directed us along the road of mass testing.
Wonder how this impacts the economy and other shares after todays falls due to Gilead news. Wonder how those 20% gainers today will fair next week with potential trial impact as a result of reduced infection rates? Time will tell ....
Also may mean 12-18 month vaccine window just hot extended!!!! WoW.
Follow the Science.
Test, test, test.

Lots like getting an on line test is going to be more problematic than booking a Sainsbury/Waitrose/Tesco/Asda delivery then?
Wonder if there a daily limit of 100k then the web site closes??

Do we need a rns to advise date of results or is the actual date already known? The schedule is remarkably tight with only 3 other trading days left!

matarakz, good info.
The clues are indeed all in the previous rns.
Excellent.
test,test,test.
gla

Its staggering to think the Govt have started a scheme without supply.
Where are those Gantt charts?
Boris is back Monday. Do not forget I suggested (2/4/20 11:08),Boris should bang some heads together and say, 'GET THE PRIMERDESIGN TEST ROLLED OUT IN ALL THE LABS AVAILABLE IN THE ENTIRE COUNTRY. YOU WILL REPORT TO ME DAILY WITH AN UPDATED GANTT CHART, SO I CAN SEE YOU ARE DOING WHAT YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD.'
Lets see those Gantt charts Boris!!!
Test,test,test

Koco welcome.
Please read posts from 6:57 onwards today!

LDN8
RP can perhaps ask the question that we have been asking.
From Q9, we were right on PPE.
Just need answrs to the questions relating to test assay. Did TF walk into 10DS will an independently verified test at the time (17/4/20) or not or were they suggesting on using the FDA EUA as a proxy for quality?
I eant the best test, no some "smoke fill room deal" as they used to day. Govt went with Chinese cheap as chips tests initially. Did they make the same mistake twice for the national roll out?
Or has the Sandman analysis of PrimerDesign/TF arrangement extracated them from this by using the PrimerDesign test assay?
Either line of questioning is massive, either politically (PrimerDesign had a world leading test in the PHE test trial) or for holders.
We just need confirmation.
Test, test,test

Part2
10.  Please can the results of  the epidemiological modelling, of the effects of recent social distancing measures, be presented?
A standard method of presentation is a graph of deaths per 10 million people per day, on logarithmic axis, plotted against days after the first death, on linear axis. It is appreciated that there will be uncertainties in the estimates, a problem that can be addressed by presenting upper, lower and central estimates. A graph of  this type will also allow comparison with other countries. 

11.The present format of the briefings does not allow the questioner to reply to the answers that have been given and point out where the answer given is deficient, at odds with known facts, or to suggest precisely the information that should be provided. There has been far too much shifty evasion and this needs to stop.
At the moment it is too much like PMQs where Government Ministers can simply not answer, willfully misrepresent and bluster. The briefings need a moderator of unimpeachable integrity - in previous days we could have had a Brian Walden, a Robin Day or a David Dimbleby - to keep order and make sure questions are answered properly and honestly, which at the moment they are not.

For new holders I see tghe need to repost the post VanV and myself were collating for RP.
From 1/4/20
1/4/20

1.Three suppliers have been down selected to provide the UK with a covid 19 PCR test I. Can the Government advise whom these suppliers are?

2. In March 2020 PHE evaluated various test systems to identify Covid 19.
See https://www.england.nhs.uk/coronavirus/wp-content/uploads/sites/52/2020/03/guidance-and-sop-covid-19-virus-testing-in-nhs-laboratories-v1.pdf

Can the results from the PHE assessment be declared by the Government?

3.Roche declared problems with their test (cobas SARS-CoV-2) at the time of their FDA EUA application. What percentage compliance to positive test cases does the Roche cobas SARS-CoV-2 test have?

Was this independently verified during the PHE assessment?

4.It is noted that in March 2020 Thermo Fisher took over Qiagen for $11.1B.
The PHE assessment reviewed the Qiagen QIAstat-Dx test but not the Thermo Fisher TaqPath test.

FDA EUA was granted to Thermo Fisher for the TaqPath test on 12/3/20.
FDA EUA was granted to Qiagenfor the QIAstat-Dx test on 30/3/20.

What test is the UK considering from Thermo Fisher?
What percentage conformance to positive test cases can the Government confirm for the Thermo Fisher test?

5.The Thermo Fisher test (TaqPath) was the first test to receive the FDA EUA approval (12/3/20). This application took 8 hours to approve. At time of the PHE assessment, why was this test not in the PHE evaluation?

6.The Qiagen (QIAstat-Dx) test had not received the FDA EUA approval at time of the PHE assessment. Why was this test considered in preference to the NCYT test for UK procurement?

7. The science behind the NCYT test is unassailable and compelling and that is why it remains at the top of the assay table.
The UK's Primerdesign (PCR) test provides an 'unmatched [diagnostic] tool' which has '100% homology' with Covid-19 and is one of the most accurate available. As of 27th March 2020 PrimerDesign can comfirm 100% homology with the 1743 full length good quality SARS-CoV-2 sequences published on the GISAID EpiCoV database.
Was the Government aware that the PrimerDesign test has a test time of 90-120 minutes?

9.For the provision of PPE and achieving 25,000 and 100,000 tests per day: Please can the public see the Gantt charts for achieving these objectives, so the following can be reviewed: the targeted end date; the dependencies; the critical path; and progress against the programme. This request is made necessary by the continued abject failure to deliver programmes to time. It simply will not do to pretend that the Gantt charts do not exist, since Gantt charts are the standard method of project planning.

Part2 to follow

Trump press conference on R4 Today (24/4/20) 8:55. Disinfectant et al.
Pretty incredible ...

LDN8 please my posts on 23/4/20 from midnight to 6am. I was questioning the TF test and eondered if it had been independently verified by PHE before TF meeting at 10DS with the Govt. Please read the message posts.
The line of questioning had big implications regarding the efficacy if the test that the Govt is about to roll out.
So in the left hand you have my line of argument and in the right hand you have Sandmans line of argument. Pooled research at its best!
Either way the outcome is massive.
Glad to here you are invested.
To comprehend the incomprehensible we need to understand the virus's hold and spread. We need testing on a scale not seen and we need the best test to be used, WHO approved.
Test, test, test
gla

LDN8 are you invested here?
Outcome of our research has massive implications whatever the outcome.
Great news for holders.

VanV thanks.
Please read the posts from midnight to 6am on 23/4/20!
Either way impact massive!
Test,test,test

Sandman research was better than the RNS I was waiting for to advise about next weeks results date.
Excellent research.
gla

Whilst Sandmans research needs validation it is a convincing argument.
For others who dispute the excellent research, then our political masters need be be asked the line of questioning about the Thermo Fisher assay that I was probing on in the postes titled "Thermofischer" , around 23/4/20 at 00:31 and 05:51.
VanV can we engage RP?
The truth on the TF test assay needs to be revealed.
Well done Sandman.Excellent research.
Test,test,test
gla

Anders_uk, and to reiterate its the PrimerDesign test assay!!!!
Follow the science
Test,test,test

Sandman, excellent research.
See my recent posts (Apr 2020 00:31) on the concern about the TF test. This may explain why there are only 3 tests recommended by the WHO: Roche, Primerdesign and Abbott. Thermo Fisher test assay is not on the list.

Thermo Fisher bought out Qiagen for $11.1B in March 2020!!!!
This could be massive for NCYT as TF will have first hand knowledge of NCYT product. This would be a game changer for the NCYT share price.
Lets hope your research is correct. It all makes sense to me.
Test, test, test
gla

Sandman, excellent research.
See my recent posts (Apr 2020 00:31) on the concern about the TF test. This may explain why there are only 3 tests recommended by the WHO: Roche, Primerdesign and Abbott. Thermo Fisher test assay is not on the list.

Thermo Fisher bought out Qiagen for $11.1B in March 2020!!!!
This could be massive for NCYT as TF will have first hand knowledge of NCYT product. This would be a game changer for the NCYT share price.
Lets hope your research is correct. It all makes sense to me.
Test, test, test
gla