RE: Physical gold2 Dec 2025 23:01
"Always have physical gold and silver in your hand, cant go wrong." I'd have to disagree. Price matters. Whereas someone holding gold the last 2years and the next 1 to 2 yes is doing quite well, someone having held gold since the summer of 2011 has done quite poorly.
It always have been and always will be the difference between value and price that matters.
Pavlar I'm not implying that i believe that you are a gold bug. But there's a lot of gold bugs out there thinking they understand something Buffet doesn't. Forgetting that their last 2years of outperforming the market fails to vindicate their 50 years of under performing the market.
Gold by its nature over a long enough period holds (not gains) its value, this is it's advantage over fiat currencies (altho fiats can be mismanaged they are ultimately vastly superior actual currencies). So if you have the choice of holding gold or a fiat currency over a long period of time, gold is the obvious choice. Only that isn't the choice we are faced with. When given the option of bonds, businesses, stocks, real estate and gold, what ultimately matters is price vrs value.
I agree with you on cryptocurrencies (at least the ones that aren't back by anything), the only valid argument for why they would hold any value is the network in of its self. The cryptography albeit clever can (and has) been replicated many times over. whereas precious metals have limited competition when it comes to their physical properties that make them useful candidates for currency.